Spatial kinematics of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and their close companions from Integral Field Unit spectroscopy

We present Integral Field Unit (IFU) spectroscopy of four brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) at z~0.1. Three of the BCGs have close companions within a projected radius of 20 kpc and one has no companion within that radius. We calculate the dynamical masses of the BCGs and their companions to be 1.4x10^11<M_dyn (M_solar)<1.5x10^12. We estimate the probability that the companions of the BCGs are bound using the observed masses and velocity offsets. We show that the lowest mass companion (1:4) is not bound while the two nearly equal mass (1:1.45 and 1:1.25) companions are likely to merge with their host BCGs in 0.35 Gyr in major, dry mergers. We conclude that some BCGs continue to grow from major merging even at z~0. We analyse the stellar kinematics of these systems using the \lambda_R parameter developed by the SAURON team. This offers a new and unique means to measure the stellar angular momentum of BCGs and make a direct comparison to other early-type galaxies. The BCGs and their companions have similar ellipticities to those of other early-type galaxies but are more massive. We find that not all these massive galaxies have low \lambda_R_e as one might expect. One of the four BCGs and the two massive companions are found to be fast-rotating galaxies with high angular momentum, thereby providing a new test for models of galaxy evolution and the formation of Intra-Cluster Light.Comment: 5 pages. Accepted for publication in MNRAS Letter

The Angular Momentum of Brightest Cluster Galaxies

Massive Brightest Cluster Galaxies (BCGs) are observed to have a range of angular momenta, suggesting a variety of merging historie

Atmospheric Water Harvester

Atmospheric water harvesting uses the vapor-compression cycle to collect water from the moisture in the air. The system’s components include an evaporator, condenser, compressor, fan, and several expansion valves. Condensate from the air is then funneled into a receptacle, which determines the efficiency of the water harvesting system. For this senior project, the goal is to increase the efficiency of an existing atmospheric water harvester

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) : The mechanisms for quiescent galaxy formation at z&lt;1

© 2016 The Authors. One key problem in astrophysics is understanding how and why galaxies switch off their star formation, building the quiescent population that we observe in the local Universe. From the Galaxy And Mass Assembly and VIsible MultiObject Spectrograph Public Extragalactic Redshift surveys, we use spectroscopic indices to select quiescent and candidate transition galaxies.We identify potentially rapidly transitioning post-starburst (PSB) galaxies and slower transitioning green-valley galaxies. Over the last 8Gyr, the quiescent population has grown more slowly in number density at high masses (M * > 10 11 M ⊙ ) than at intermediate masses (M * > 10 10.6 M ⊙ ). There is evolution in both the PSB and green-valley stellar mass functions, consistent with higher mass galaxies quenching at earlier cosmic times.At intermediatemasses (M * > 10 10.6 M ⊙ ), we find a green-valley transition time-scale of 2.6 Gyr. Alternatively, at z ~ 0.7, the entire growth rate could be explained by fast-quenching PSB galaxies, with a visibility time-scale of 0.5 Gyr. At lower redshift, the number density of PSBs is so low that an unphysically short visibility window would be required for them to contribute significantly to the quiescent population growth. The importance of the fast-quenching route may rapidly diminish at z 10 11 M ⊙ ), there is tension between the large number of candidate transition galaxies compared to the slow growth of the quiescent population. This could be resolved if not all high-mass PSB and green-valley galaxies are transitioning from star forming to quiescent, for example if they rejuvenate out of the quiescent population following the accretion of gas and triggering of star formation, or if they fail to completely quench their star formation

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The Merging Potential of Brightest Group Galaxies

Using a volume-limited sample of 550 groups from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly Galaxy Group Catalogue spanning the halo mass range , we investigate the merging potential of central Brightest Group Galaxies (BGGs). We use spectroscopically confirmed close-companion galaxies as an indication of the potential stellar mass buildup of low-redshift BGGs, z ≤ 0.2. We identify 17 close-companion galaxies with projected separations rp \u3c 30 kpc, relative velocities Δv ≤ 300 km s−1, and stellar mass ratios MBGG/MCC ≤ 4 relative to the BGG. These close-companion galaxies yield a total pair fraction of 0.03 ± 0.01. Overall, we find that BGGs in our sample have the potential to grow in stellar mass due to mergers by 2.2 ± 1.5% Gyr−1. This is lower than the stellar mass growth predicted by current galaxy evolution models

Reviews

The following publications have been reviewed by the mentioned authors;Art and Society One. War by Ken Baynes, reviewed by Ronald FrankenbergArt and Society Two. Work by Ken Baynes and Alan Robinson, reviewed by Ronald FrankenbergArt and Society Three. Worship by Ken and Kate Baynes, reviewed by Ronald FrankenbergArt and Science by Dolf Rieser, reviewed by M. K. PaffardA COMMON SYSTEM OF EXAMINING AT 16+ by the Schols Council Examinations Bulletin No.23, reviewed by W. G. SkinnerSchool Resource Centres, the Schools Council Working Paper 43, reviewed by L. BroughA History of English Furniture by John Harrison, reviewed by S. J. EgglestonTrends in School Design by Eric Pearson, reviewed by P. K. BodenWorking Space, A Place to Paint, Language Aeas by Jason Dean, reviewed by P. K. BodenAlive to Art by Jose Llobera, reviewed by John LancasterVisual Education in the primary school by John M. Pickering, reviewed by L. BroughArt & Design Cards. Packs 1 & 2 by Ian Pillinger, reviewed by Francis ZankerWorkshop Assignments, Book One by S. Dunkerley & A. Huxton, reviewed by L. BroughStep By Step Metalwork, Book 3 by Kenneth Wells, reviewed by M. SayerIntroducing Jewellery Making by John Crawford, reviewed by John DecorteMaggie Hayes Jewellery Book by Maggie Hayes, reviewed by S. J. Egglesto