Degeneration of basal and limbic networks is a core feature of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

Acknowledgment We would like to acknowledge the support of the Maxwell Computer Cluster funded by the University of Aberdeen. We also gratefully acknowledge study investigators and the generosity of study participants. Funding This study was sponsored entirely by TauRx Therapeutics Ltd (PAR1577). The Maxwell Computer Cluster is funded by the University of Aberdeen.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Potential of Low Dose Leuco-Methylthioninium Bis(Hydromethanesulphonate) (LMTM) Monotherapy for Treatment of Mild Alzheimer’s Disease : Cohort Analysis as Modified Primary Outcome in a Phase III Clinical Trial

The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170560. The study was sponsored by TauRx Therapeutics (Singapore). We thank Lon Schneider and Howard Feldman for their contribution to the Scientific Advisory Board. We gratefully acknowledge study investigators and the generosity of study participants. Authors’ disclosures available online (http://j-alz.com/manuscript disclosures/17-0560r3).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Protocol of the Cognitive Health in Ageing Register: Investigational, Observational and Trial Studies in Dementia Research (CHARIOT): Prospective Readiness cOhort (PRO) SubStudy

The Cognitive Health in Ageing Register: Investigational, Observational and Trial Studies in Dementia Research (CHARIOT): Prospective Readiness cOhort (PRO) SubStudy (CPSS), sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC, is an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker enriched observational study that began 3 July 2015 CPSS aims to identify and validate determinants of AD, alongside cognitive, functional and biological changes in older adults with or without detectable evidence of AD pathology at baseline. CPSS is a dual-site longitudinal cohort (3.5 years) assessed quarterly. Cognitively normal participants (60-85 years) were recruited across Greater London and Edinburgh. Participants are classified as high, medium (amnestic or non-amnestic) or low risk for developing mild cognitive impairment-Alzheimer's disease based on their Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status performance at screening. Additional AD-related assessments include: a novel cognitive composite, the Global Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite, brain MRI and positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Lifestyle, other cognitive and functional data, as well as biosamples (blood, urine, and saliva) are collected. Primarily, study analyses will evaluate longitudinal change in cognitive and functional outcomes. Annual interim analyses for descriptive data occur throughout the course of the study, although inferential statistics are conducted as required. CPSS received ethical approvals from the London-Central Research Ethics Committee (15/LO/0711) and the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (RPC 630/3764/33110) The study is at the forefront of global AD prevention efforts, with frequent and robust sampling of the well-characterised cohort, allowing for detection of incipient pathophysiological, cognitive and functional changes that could inform therapeutic strategies to prevent and/or delay cognitive impairment and dementia. Dissemination of results will target the scientific community, research participants, volunteer community, public, industry, regulatory authorities and policymakers. On study completion, and following a predetermined embargo period, CPSS data are planned to be made accessible for analysis to facilitate further research into the determinants of AD pathology, onset of symptomatology and progression. The CHARIOT:PRO SubStudy is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02114372). Notices of protocol modifications will be made available through this trial registry. [Abstract copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Concentration-Dependent Activity of Hydromethylthionine on Cognitive Decline and Brain Atrophy in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge study investigators and the generosity of study participants. We gratefully acknowledge Professor Gordon Wilcock for critical review and commentary on drafts of the manuscript. Author’s disclosures available online (https://www.j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/19-0772r1). SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190772. Availability of data and materials The datasets and analyses used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Magnetic resonance imaging measures of brain volumes across the EXPEDITION trials in mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia

Abstract Introduction Solanezumab is a monoclonal antibody that preferentially binds soluble amyloid beta and promotes its clearance from the brain. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess the effect of low‐dose solanezumab (400 mg) on global brain volume measures in patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia quantified using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (vMRI) data from the EXPEDITION clinical trial program. Methods Patients with mild or moderate AD (EXPEDITION and EXPEDITION2) and mild AD (EXPEDITION3), were treated with either placebo or solanezumab (400 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 76 weeks. vMRI scans were acquired at baseline and at 80 weeks from 427 MRI facilities using a standardized imaging protocol. Whole brain volume (WBV) and ventricle volume (VV) changes were estimated at 80 weeks using either boundary shift integral (EXPEDITION and EXPEDITION2) or tensor‐based morphometry (EXPEDITION3). Results The pooled cohort used for this study consisted of participants with vMRI at baseline and week 80 across the three trials. Analyzed patient subgroups comprised full patient cohort (N = 2933), apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4+ carriers (N = 1835), and patients with mild (N = 2497) or moderate AD dementia (N = 428). No significant effect (all P‐values ≥.05) of treatment was observed in the pooled sample, individual trials, or subgroups of patients with mild or moderate AD or APOE ε4 carriers, in either WBV or VV change. Discussion Analysis of patients with mild or moderate AD dementia from baseline to 80 weeks using vMRI measures of WBV and VV changes suggested that low‐dose solanezumab was not linked to changes in volumes at 80 weeks. Analysis of the pooled cohort did not demonstrate an effect on brain volumes with treatment. Evaluation of a higher dose of solanezumab in the preclinical stage of AD is currently being undertaken

Validation of 3‐ and 5‐point severity scales to assess ARIA‐E

Abstract INTRODUCTION Anti‐amyloid‐β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer the promise of disease modification and are emerging treatment options in Alzheimer's disease. Anti‐Aβ mAbs require brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to detect anti‐amyloid‐induced amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), important adverse drug reactions associated with some anti‐Aβ mAbs currently available in the United States and in clinical development. We present a simple rating system for ARIA‐edema (ARIA‐E) that can assess severity on a 3‐ or 5‐point scale based upon a single linear measurement of the largest area of lesion, and dissemination in space, termed the 3‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3) and the 5‐point Severity Scale of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐5), respectively. METHODS MRI results were collected from 75 participants from the SCarlet RoAD (NCT01224106) and Marguerite RoAD (NCT02051608) studies of gantenerumab. Three neuroradiologists experienced with the detection of ARIA‐E were selected to read all cases independently. One rater was then chosen for a second read to assess intra‐reader reproducibility. RESULTS The three raters had high agreement in identifying and grading ARIA‐E. The Cohen/Fleiss kappa (κ) scores (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the inter‐ and intra‐reader comparisons for SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 were 0.79 (0.70–1.00), 0.94 (0.94–1.00), 0.73 (0.66–1.00), and 0.90 (0.90–1.00), respectively. DISCUSSION Our study suggests that SSAE‐3 and SSAE‐5 are valid ARIA‐E rating scales for use in routine clinical practice by experienced radiologists in specialized settings. The application of these scales in everyday use in clinical practice will support the expansion of anti‐Aβ mAbs as a treatment option for people living with Alzheimer's disease. Highlights A simple rating scale is needed to rate severity of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities–edema (ARIA‐E) in both research and clinical settings. The 3‐ and 5‐point Severity Scales of ARIA‐E (SSAE‐3/‐5) have good inter‐ and intra‐reader agreement. The SSAE‐3/‐5 have been used in most major Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials to date and are suitable for large‐scale use in routine clinical practice, which may help support the expansion of anti‐amyloid antibodies as treatment options for AD

Measurement of brain atrophy in subcortical vascular disease: A comparison of different approaches and the impact of ischaemic lesions

Measurement of brain atrophy has been proposed as a surrogate marker in MS and degenerative dementias. Although cerebral small vessel disease predominantly affects white and subcortical grey matter, recent data suggest that whole brain atrophy is also a good indicator of clinical and cognitive status in this disease. Automated methods to measure atrophy are available that are accurate and reproducible in disease-free brains. However, optimal methods in small vessel disease have not been established and the impact of ischaemic lesions on different techniques has not been explored systematically. In this study, three contrasting techniques -- Statistical Parametric Mapping 5 (SPM5), SIENAX and BrainVisa -- were applied to measure cross-sectional atrophy (brain parenchymal fraction or BPF) in a large (n=143) two-centre cohort of patients with CADASIL, a genetic model of small vessel disease. All three techniques showed similar sensitivity to trends in BPF associated with age and lesion load. No single technique was particularly vulnerable to error as a result of lesions. Provided major errors in registration were excluded by visual inspection, manual correction of segmentations had a negligible impact with mean errors of 0.41% for SIENAX and 0.46% for BrainVisa. BPF correlated strongly with global cognitive function and physical disability, independent of the technique used. Correlation coefficients with the Minimental State Examination score were: BrainVisa 0.58, SIENAX 0.58, SPM5 0.60 (for all, p<0.001). These results suggest that all three methods can be applied reliably in patients with ischaemic lesions. Choice of analysis approach for this kind of clinical question will be determined by factors other than their robustness and precision, such as a desire to explore subtle localised changes using extensions of these processing tools

Comparing ARIA-E severity scales and effects of treatment management thresholds

Introduction: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities–edema (ARIA-E) is associated with anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibody treatment. ARIA-E severity may be assessed using the Barkhof Grand Total Scale (BGTS) or the 3- or 5-point Severity Scales of ARIA-E (SSAE-3/SSAE-5). We assessed inter- and intra-reader correlations between SSAE-3/5 and BGTS. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging scans were collected from 75 participants in the SCarlet RoAD and Marguerite RoAD studies. Three neuroradiologists reviewed scans at baseline and at follow-up. Concordance in dichotomized ARIA-E ratings was assessed for a range of BGTS thresholds. Results: SSAE-3/5 scores correlated with BGTS scores, with high inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficients across all scales. There was high agreement in dichotomized ratings for SSAE-3 > 1 versus BGTS > 3 for all readers (accuracy 0.85–0.93) and between pairs of readers. Discussion: SSAE-3/5 showed high degrees of correlation with BGTS, potentially allowing seamless transition from the BGTS to SSAE-3/5 for ARIA-E management

Efficacy and safety of tau-aggregation inhibitor therapy in patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase 3 trial.

BackgroundLeuco-methylthioninium bis(hydromethanesulfonate; LMTM), a stable reduced form of the methylthioninium moiety, acts as a selective inhibitor of tau protein aggregation both in vitro and in transgenic mouse models. Methylthioninium chloride has previously shown potential efficacy as monotherapy in patients with Alzheimer's disease. We aimed to determine whether LMTM was safe and effective in modifying disease progression in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.MethodsWe did a 15-month, randomised, controlled double-blind, parallel-group trial at 115 academic centres and private research clinics in 16 countries in Europe, North America, Asia, and Russia with patients younger than 90 years with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Patients concomitantly using other medicines for Alzheimer's disease were permitted to be included because we considered it infeasible not to allow their inclusion; however, patients using medicines carrying warnings of methaemoglobinaemia were excluded because the oxidised form of methylthioninium in high doses has been shown to induce this condition. We randomly assigned participants (3:3:4) to 75 mg LMTM twice a day, 125 mg LMTM twice a day, or control (4 mg LMTM twice a day to maintain blinding with respect to urine or faecal discolouration) administered as oral tablets. We did the randomisation with an interactive web response system using 600 blocks of length ten, and stratified patients by severity of disease, global region, whether they were concomitantly using Alzheimer's disease-labelled medications, and site PET capability. Participants, their study partners (generally carers), and all assessors were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The coprimary outcomes were progression on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Alzheimer's Disease Co-operative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) scales from baseline assessed at week 65 in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01689246) and the European Union Clinical Trials Registry (2012-002866-11).FindingsBetween Jan 29, 2013, and June 26, 2014, we recruited and randomly assigned 891 participants to treatment (357 to control, 268 to 75 mg LMTM twice a day, and 266 to 125 mg LMTM twice a day). The prespecified primary analyses did not show any treatment benefit at either of the doses tested for the coprimary outcomes (change in ADAS-Cog score compared with control [n=354, 6·32, 95% CI 5·31-7·34]: 75 mg LMTM twice a day [n=257] -0·02, -1·60 to 1·56, p=0·9834, 125 mg LMTM twice a day [n=250] -0·43, -2·06 to 1·20, p=0·9323; change in ADCS-ADL score compared with control [-8·22, 95% CI -9·63 to -6·82]: 75 mg LMTM twice a day -0·93, -3·12 to 1·26, p=0·8659; 125 mg LMTM twice a day -0·34, -2·61 to 1·93, p=0·9479). Gastrointestinal and urinary effects were the most common adverse events with both high doses of LMTM, and the most common causes for discontinuation. Non-clinically significant dose-dependent reductions in haemoglobin concentrations were the most common laboratory abnormality. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities were noted in less than 1% (8/885) of participants.InterpretationThe primary analysis for this study was negative, and the results do not suggest benefit of LMTM as an add-on treatment for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Findings from a recently completed 18-month trial of patients with mild Alzheimer's disease will be reported soon.FundingTauRx Therapeutics