Expression and function of the bile acid receptor GpBAR1 (TGR5) in the murine enteric nervous system

BACKGROUND: Bile acids (BAs) regulate cells by activating nuclear and membrane-bound receptors. G protein coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GpBAR1) is a membrane-bound G-protein-coupled receptor that can mediate the rapid, transcription-independent actions of BAs. Although BAs have well-known actions on motility and secretion, nothing is known about the localization and function of GpBAR1 in the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We generated an antibody to the C-terminus of human GpBAR1, and characterized the antibody by immunofluorescence and Western blotting of HEK293-GpBAR1-GFP cells. We localized GpBAR1 immunoreactivity (IR) and mRNA in the mouse intestine, and determined the mechanism by which BAs activate GpBAR1 to regulate intestinal motility. KEY RESULTS: The GpBAR1 antibody specifically detected GpBAR1-GFP at the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells, and interacted with proteins corresponding in mass to the GpBAR1-GFP fusion protein. GpBAR1-IR and mRNA were detected in enteric ganglia of the mouse stomach and small and large intestine, and in the muscularis externa and mucosa of the small intestine. Within the myenteric plexus of the intestine, GpBAR1-IR was localized to approximately 50% of all neurons and to >80% of inhibitory motor neurons and descending interneurons expressing nitric oxide synthase. Deoxycholic acid, a GpBAR1 agonist, caused a rapid and sustained inhibition of spontaneous phasic activity of isolated segments of ileum and colon by a neurogenic, cholinergic and nitrergic mechanism, and delayed gastrointestinal transit. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: G protein coupled bile acid receptor 1 is unexpectedly expressed in enteric neurons. Bile acids activate GpBAR1 on inhibitory motor neurons to release nitric oxide and suppress motility, revealing a novel mechanism for the actions of BAs on intestinal motility

Role of ERK and JNK pathways in regulating cell motility and matrix metalloproteinase 9 production in growth factor-stimulated human epidermal keratinocytes

Invasion is an essential cellular response that plays an important role in a number of physiological and pathological processes. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) production and cell movement are diverse cellular responses integral to the process of invasion. The complexity of the invasive process suggests the necessity of coordinate activation of more than one signaling pathway in order to activate specific factors responsible for regulating these cellular responses. In this report, we demonstrate that cell movement and MMP-9 production are both directly dependent on the activation of endogenous ERK signaling in hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-or epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated human epidermal keratinocytes. The kinetic profiles of endogenous MEK and ERK activity suggest that prolonged activation of these signal transducers is an underlying mechanism involved in stimulating cell motility and MMP-9 production. In support of this finding, a transient MEK/ERK signal elicited by keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) fails to stimulate these invasion-related responses. Specific inhibition of MEK leads to suppression of ERK activation, marked reduction in steady-state levels of c-Fos, and inhibition of cell movement and MMP-9 production. This occurs despite continued activation of JNK and c-Jun signaling in the presence of MEK-specific inhibition. In contrast, when JNK activity is specifically inhibited in HGF-stimulated cells, AP-1 activity is suppressed but cell motility is not affected. This evidence suggests that while ERK and JNK activity are necessary for AP-1 activation, ERK but not JNK is sufficient in stimulating cell motility. J. Cell. Physiol. 180:271–284, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/34441/1/15_ftp.pd

Etude de la receptivite alpha 2-adrenergique de la cellule cancereuse colique humaine HT29

SIGLECNRS T 57748 / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

Comparative binding of bile acids to serum lipoproteins and albumin

Characteristics of the binding of lithocholic acid (LC), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDC), and cholic acid to human plasma proteins were studied. Affinity of the different plasma protein fractions for the bile acids studied decreased with increased polarity of the steroid nucleus of the bile acid. Binding of LC, CDC, and cholic acid to the lipoprotein-free, albumin-rich plasma fraction was characterized by two classes of binding sites with respective K(D)s of 2, 5, and 51 μM, and of 39, 2,387, and 5,575 μM, while corresponding B(max) values were similar for the different bile acids, at around 6 and 100 nmol/mg protein. Bile acid binding to the different lipoprotein fractions was characterized by a single population of binding sites, with a K(D) ranging from 47 to 66 μM for LC, 695 to 1010 μM for CDC, and 2,511 to 2,562 μM for cholic acid. B(max) values, at 416-913 nmol/mg protein, were similar among the different bile acids studied. Both glycine- and taurine-conjugated, as well as unconjugated LC competitively inhibited [24-14C]LC binding to low density (LDL) and to high density lipoproteins (HDL) to the same extent, while the more polar LC-3-sulfate, CDC, and cholic acid were increasingly less potent in displacing LC binding from the respective lipoproteins. Furthermore, all bile acids studied shared the same lipoprotein binding site. The lipoprotein fluorescence at 330-334 nm, following excitation at 280 nm, was diminished after incubation with LC, suggesting that the bile acid masks the tryptophan residues of the protein moiety. Finally, the initial rate of uptake of 1 μM LC, in isolated hamster hepatocytes, at around 0.045 nmol · sec-1 · mg cell wt-1, was not affected by the protein carrier. However, for the same concentration of LC, bound to either LDL or HDL, LC binding resulted in 75-77% of the total [24- 14C]LC nonspecifically bound to the hepatocyte, compared to 65% when bound to albumin, and 45% in the absence of protein. The studies show that, under conditions when the serum bile acid concentration exceeds the capacity of the high affinity class of albumin binding sites for bile acids, lipoproteins have similar or greater affinity to bind bile acids than does albumin. The ability of lipoproteins to increase the nonspecific association of lithocholic acid with liver cells may also facilitate bile acid association with extrahepatic tissues. As lipoproteins, in contrast to albumin, are targeted to most cells, they may play a major role in the transport of potentially toxic bile acids to peripheral cells