Liraglutide and Glycaemic Outcomes in the LEADER Trial

Introduction: The LEADER trial was a cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk that compared liraglutide (n = 4668) with placebo (n = 4672) using a primary composite endpoint of 3-point major adverse CV events. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to investigate glycaemic outcomes across both treatment groups. Methods: Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at randomisation, month 3, month 6 and every 6 months thereafter. Cox regression was used to analyse time to a composite endpoint of glycaemic deterioration, defined as a specified change in HbA1c or a substantial intensification of insulin or oral antihyperglycaemic drug (OAD). The individual components of the composite were also analysed. Results: Baseline characteristics, including insulin and OAD use, were balanced between treatment groups. HbA1c decreased from baseline in both groups, but the reduction was greater with liraglutide [estimated treatment difference at month 36: − 0.40%; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 0.45, − 0.34] despite the addition of more OADs and higher insulin use in the placebo group. Fewer of the patients treated with liraglutide (n = 3202, 68.6%) experienced glycaemic deterioration compared with those administered the placebo (n = 3988, 85.4%; average hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI 0.48, 0.53; p < 0.001). Analysis of the individual components showed similar results (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of CV events who were treated with liraglutide achieved greater reductions in HbA1c, had a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and presented less glycaemic deterioration than similar patients who received the placebo. Nonetheless, progressive loss of glycaemic control occurred in both groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01179048. Funding: Novo Nordisk

Health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes participating in the LEADER trial

Aims: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) participating in the LEADER cardiovascular outcomes trial using the five-dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D). Materials and methods: The EQ-5D was administered every 12 months in a subset of patients from Canada, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. We compared changes in utility index scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores from baseline to 36 months in participants treated with liraglutide and placebo. We also assessed which complications had the greatest impact on quality of life. Results: At 36 months, less deterioration in EQ-5D utility index score was seen in the liraglutide group (−0.058) than in the placebo group (−0.082; estimated treatment difference [ETD] 0.023, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004;0.043; P = 0.020). A smaller decrease in EQ-5D VAS score was also demonstrated in the liraglutide group (−3.51) vs. the placebo group (−5.45; ETD 1.94, 95% CI 0.32;3.57; P = 0.019). The benefits of liraglutide treatment compared with placebo were driven primarily by shifts in the domains of mobility and self-care. The most influential events contributing to poorer HRQoL were stroke, heart failure, malignant neoplasm and confirmed hypoglycaemia. Conclusions: Liraglutide demonstrated a modest but significant benefit in patient-reported health status using the EQ-5D, compared with placebo. This benefit may be of clinical relevance and requires further study

Liraglutide reduces cardiovascular events and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus independently of baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and statin use results from the LEADER trial

The causal relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events has been well established. In people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, LDL-C lowering with statins is strongly endorsed by clinical practice guidelines, with suggested LDL-C target levels including <100 mg/dL for high-risk patients, <70 mg/dL for very high-risk patients, and ≤55 mg/dL in patients with cardiovascular disease at extreme risk.2 Because LDL-C is a dominant pathophysiological mechanism of atherogenesis, questions pertain to whether newer antiatherosclerotic and cardiovascular protective therapies exhibit efficacy, even in the setting of low LDL-C. In this post hoc analysis of the LEADER trial, we evaluated the efficacy of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality across the spectrum of baseline LDL-C and statin use

Long‐term efficacy and safety of combined insulin and GLP‐1 therapy: evidence from the LEADER trial

AIM: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and insulin combination therapy is an effective treatment option for type 2 diabetes, but long-term data are lacking. The aim was to assess the long-term efficacy of the GLP-1RA liraglutide in subgroups by insulin use in the LEADER trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LEADER assessed cardiovascular (CV) safety and efficacy of liraglutide (1.8 mg) versus placebo (plus standard of care therapy) in 9340 patients with type 2 diabetes and high risk of CV disease, for up to 5 years. We analyzed CV events, metabolic parameters and hypoglycaemia post hoc in three subgroups by baseline insulin use (basal-only insulin, other insulin or no insulin). Insulin was a non-random treatment allocation as part of standard of care therapy. RESULTS: At baseline, 5171 (55%) patients were not receiving insulin, 3159 (34%) were receiving basal-only insulin and 1010 (11%) other insulins. Insulin users had a longer diabetes duration and slightly worse glycaemic control (HbA1c) than the no-insulin subgroup. Liraglutide reduced HbA1c and weight versus placebo in all three subgroups (P < .001), and severe hypoglycaemia rate in the basal-only insulin subgroup. The need for insulin was less with liraglutide. CV risk reduction with liraglutide was similar to the main trial results in the basal-only and no-insulin subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on insulin, liraglutide improved glycaemic control, weight and need for insulin versus placebo, for at least 36 months with no increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia, while maintaining CV safety/efficacy, supporting the combination of liraglutide and insulin for management of type 2 diabetes

Health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes participating in the LEADER trial

Aims To assess health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) participating in the LEADER cardiovascular outcomes trial using the five‐dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ‐5D). Materials and methods The EQ‐5D was administered every 12 months in a subset of patients from Canada, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. We compared changes in utility index scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores from baseline to 36 months in participants treated with liraglutide and placebo. We also assessed which complications had the greatest impact on quality of life. Results At 36 months, less deterioration in EQ‐5D utility index score was seen in the liraglutide group (−0.058) than in the placebo group (−0.082; estimated treatment difference [ETD] 0.023, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004;0.043; P = 0.020). A smaller decrease in EQ‐5D VAS score was also demonstrated in the liraglutide group (−3.51) vs. the placebo group (−5.45; ETD 1.94, 95% CI 0.32;3.57; P = 0.019). The benefits of liraglutide treatment compared with placebo were driven primarily by shifts in the domains of mobility and self‐care. The most influential events contributing to poorer HRQoL were stroke, heart failure, malignant neoplasm and confirmed hypoglycaemia. Conclusions Liraglutide demonstrated a modest but significant benefit in patient‐reported health status using the EQ‐5D, compared with placebo. This benefit may be of clinical relevance and requires further study

Risk of Thyroid Cancer Associated with Use of Liraglutide and Other Antidiabetic Drugs in a US Commercially Insured Population

Donnie Funch,1 Kathleen Mortimer,1 Najat J Ziyadeh,1 John D Seeger,1 Li Zhou,1 Eva Ng,1 Douglas Ross,2,3 Atheline Major-Pedersen,4 Heidrun Bosch-Traberg,5 Helge Gydesen,6 David D Dore1,7 1Optum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Thyroid Associates, Boston, MA, USA; 3Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 4Global Safety, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5Global Development, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6Epidemiology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7Department of Health Services, Policy &amp; Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USACorrespondence: Najat J ZiyadehOptum Epidemiology, 1325 Boylston Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USAEmail [email protected]: Quantify association between the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and risk of thyroid cancer (TC) compared to other antidiabetics.Patients and Methods: Initiators of liraglutide, exenatide, metformin, pioglitazone or groups of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas were identified in a US health plan (2010&ndash; 2014) and followed for a median of 17&thinsp;months. Thyroid cancer cases during follow-up were identified via a validated algorithm. Incidence rates of TC among liraglutide and comparators were assessed using relative risks estimated within propensity score-matched cohorts using intention to treat (ITT) and time on drug analyses. Latency effects and potential surveillance bias were evaluated.Results: Relative risks from ITT analyses ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56&ndash; 1.79) versus metformin to 1.70 (95% CI 1.03&ndash; 2.81) versus all comparators excluding exenatide. Effect estimates from latency analyses were slightly attenuated. Time on drug analyses suggested no increased risk for either longer duration or higher cumulative dose of liraglutide. Medical record review found 85% were papillary or a follicular variant of papillary or both; 46% were microcarcinomas (&le; 10 millimeters), which were more prevalent in the liraglutide cohort (67% versus 43% in all comparators).Conclusion: Relative risks were elevated for several comparisons, which should be interpreted cautiously because of potential residual confounding and surveillance bias. Liraglutide cases had smaller thyroid nodules and shorter time-to-diagnosis, suggesting increased surveillance for TC among liraglutide initiators, especially shortly after the drug&acute;s approval. After adjusting the primary analyses (ITT) for latency, no significant elevated risk of TC was observed among liraglutide initiators.Keywords: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, type 2 diabetes, administrative claims, intention-to-treat, time-on-dru

Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide versus Placebo as Add-on to Glucose Lowering Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment (LIRA-RENAL): A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE Renal impairment in type 2 diabetes limits available glucose-lowering treatment options. This trial was conducted to establish the efficacy and safety of liraglutide as an add-on to existing glucose-lowering medications in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this 26-week, double-blind trial, 279 patients with HbA1c 7–10%, BMI 20–45 kg/m2, and moderate renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2; MDRD) were randomized (1:1) to once-daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 140) or placebo (n = 139). RESULTS The estimated treatment difference in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 was −0.66% (−7.25 mmol/mol) (95% CI −0.90 to −0.43 [−9.82 to −4.69]), P < 0.0001). Fasting plasma glucose decreased more with liraglutide (−1.22 mmol/L [−22.0 mg/dL]) than with placebo (−0.57 mmol/L [−10.3 mg/dL], P = 0.036). There was a greater reduction in body weight with liraglutide (−2.41 kg) than with placebo (−1.09 kg, P = 0.0052). No changes in renal function were observed (eGFR relative ratio to baseline: −1% liraglutide, +1% placebo; estimated treatment ratio [ETR] 0.98, P = 0.36). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (liraglutide, 35.7%; placebo, 17.5%). No difference in hypoglycemic episodes was observed between treatment groups (event rate/100 patient-years of exposure: liraglutide, 30.47; placebo, 40.08; P = 0.54). The estimated ratio to baseline for lipase was 1.33 for liraglutide and 0.97 for placebo (ETR 1.37, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Liraglutide did not affect renal function and demonstrated better glycemic control, with no increase in hypoglycemia risk but with higher withdrawals due to GI adverse events than placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment

European regulation on orphan medicinal products: 10 years of experience and future perspectives.

In 2000, regulation on orphan medicinal products was adopted in the European Union with the aim of benefiting patients who suffer from serious, rare conditions for which there is currently no satisfactory treatment. Since then, more than 850 orphan drug designations have been granted by the European Commission based on a positive opinion from the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP), and more than 60 orphan drugs have received marketing authorization in Europe. Here, stimulated by the tenth anniversary of the COMP, we reflect on the outcomes and experience gained in the past decade, and contemplate issues for the future, such as catalysing drug development for the large number of rare diseases that still lack effective treatments