163 research outputs found
Subgroup identification in dose-finding trials via model-based recursive partitioning
An important task in early phase drug development is to identify patients,
which respond better or worse to an experimental treatment. While a variety of
different subgroup identification methods have been developed for the situation
of trials that study an experimental treatment and control, much less work has
been done in the situation when patients are randomized to different dose
groups. In this article we propose new strategies to perform subgroup analyses
in dose-finding trials and discuss the challenges, which arise in this new
setting. We consider model-based recursive partitioning, which has recently
been applied to subgroup identification in two arm trials, as a promising
method to tackle these challenges and assess its viability using a real trial
example and simulations. Our results show that model-based recursive
partitioning can be used to identify subgroups of patients with different
dose-response curves and improves estimation of treatment effects and minimum
effective doses, when heterogeneity among patients is present.Comment: 23 pages, 6 figure
Model Selection versus Model Averaging in Dose Finding Studies
Phase II dose finding studies in clinical drug development are typically
conducted to adequately characterize the dose response relationship of a new
drug. An important decision is then on the choice of a suitable dose response
function to support dose selection for the subsequent Phase III studies. In
this paper we compare different approaches for model selection and model
averaging using mathematical properties as well as simulations. Accordingly, we
review and illustrate asymptotic properties of model selection criteria and
investigate their behavior when changing the sample size but keeping the effect
size constant. In a large scale simulation study we investigate how the various
approaches perform in realistically chosen settings. Finally, the different
methods are illustrated with a recently conducted Phase II dosefinding study in
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Comment: Keywords and Phrases: Model selection; model averaging; clinical
trials; simulation stud
Approximating Probability Densities by Iterated Laplace Approximations
The Laplace approximation is an old, but frequently used method to
approximate integrals for Bayesian calculations. In this paper we develop an
extension of the Laplace approximation, by applying it iteratively to the
residual, i.e., the difference between the current approximation and the true
function. The final approximation is thus a linear combination of multivariate
normal densities, where the coefficients are chosen to achieve a good fit to
the target distribution. We illustrate on real and artificial examples that the
proposed procedure is a computationally efficient alternative to current
approaches for approximation of multivariate probability densities. The
R-package iterLap implementing the methods described in this article is
available from the CRAN servers.Comment: to appear in Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,
http://pubs.amstat.org/loi/jcg
Response-adaptive dose-finding under model uncertainty
Dose-finding studies are frequently conducted to evaluate the effect of
different doses or concentration levels of a compound on a response of
interest. Applications include the investigation of a new medicinal drug, a
herbicide or fertilizer, a molecular entity, an environmental toxin, or an
industrial chemical. In pharmaceutical drug development, dose-finding studies
are of critical importance because of regulatory requirements that marketed
doses are safe and provide clinically relevant efficacy. Motivated by a
dose-finding study in moderate persistent asthma, we propose response-adaptive
designs addressing two major challenges in dose-finding studies: uncertainty
about the dose-response models and large variability in parameter estimates. To
allocate new cohorts of patients in an ongoing study, we use optimal designs
that are robust under model uncertainty. In addition, we use a Bayesian
shrinkage approach to stabilize the parameter estimates over the successive
interim analyses used in the adaptations. This approach allows us to calculate
updated parameter estimates and model probabilities that can then be used to
calculate the optimal design for subsequent cohorts. The resulting designs are
hence robust with respect to model misspecification and additionally can
efficiently adapt to the information accrued in an ongoing study. We focus on
adaptive designs for estimating the minimum effective dose, although
alternative optimality criteria or mixtures thereof could be used, enabling the
design to address multiple objectives.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS445 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
MCPMod: An R Package for the Design and Analysis of Dose-Finding Studies
In this article the MCPMod package for the R programming environment will be introduced. It implements a recently developed methodology for the design and analysis of dose-response studies that combines aspects of multiple comparison procedures and modeling approaches (Bretz et al. 2005). The MCPMod package provides tools for the analysis of dose finding trials, as well as a variety of tools necessary to plan an experiment to be analyzed using the MCP-Mod methodology
Functional Uniform Priors for Nonlinear Modelling
This paper considers the topic of finding prior distributions when a major
component of the statistical model depends on a nonlinear function. Using
results on how to construct uniform distributions in general metric spaces, we
propose a prior distribution that is uniform in the space of functional shapes
of the underlying nonlinear function and then back-transform to obtain a prior
distribution for the original model parameters. The primary application
considered in this article is nonlinear regression, but the idea might be of
interest beyond this case. For nonlinear regression the so constructed priors
have the advantage that they are parametrization invariant and do not violate
the likelihood principle, as opposed to uniform distributions on the parameters
or the Jeffrey's prior, respectively. The utility of the proposed priors is
demonstrated in the context of nonlinear regression modelling in clinical
dose-finding trials, through a real data example and simulation. In addition
the proposed priors are used for calculation of an optimal Bayesian design.Comment: submitted for publicatio
- …