Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins

Este estudo avaliou a rugosidade superficial (Ra, µm) de 2 resinas compostas microparticuladas (Durafill; Perfection), 1 híbrida (Filtek Z250) e 2 compactáveis (Surefil; Fill Magic), antes (baseline) e após a realização de 8 técnicas de acabamento e polimento. A rugosidade foi avaliada com rugosímetro. Dez espécimes de cada resina foram submetidos aos seguintes procedimentos: A - brocas cabide; B - pontas diamantadas fina/extrafina; C - sistema Sof-Lex; D - sistema Super-Snap; E - pontas de borracha + pastas de polimento; F - pontas diamantadas + pontas de borracha + pastas de polimento; G - pontas diamantadas + Sof-Lex; H - pontas diamantadas + Super-Snap. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância a dois critérios e teste de Tukey. Foi observada diferença estatisticamente significante (p<0.05) tanto entre as resinas compostas quanto entre as técnicas de acabamento/polimento. Para todas as resinas, a maior rugosidade foi produzida com o emprego das pontas diamantadas (Ra: 0.69-1.44 µm). O menor valor de rugosidade foi obtido com o sistema Sof-Lex (Ra: 0.11- 0.25 µm). A Durafill apresentou melhor lisura que a Perfection e a Z250, que apresentaram melhor lisura que as resinas compactáveis. A seqüência completa de discos Sof-Lex produziu a melhor lisura para todas as resinas. em áreas sem acesso aos discos, as pontas de borracha e pastas de polimento produziram lisura de superfície satisfatória para as resinas híbridas enquanto as brocas carbide produziram polimento adequado para as resinas compactáveis.This study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, µm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of the following finishing/polishing techniques: A - carbide burs; B - fine/extrafine diamond burs; C - Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs; D - Super-Snap aluminum oxide discs; E - rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; F - diamond burs + rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; G - diamond burs + Sof-Lex system; H - diamond burs + Super-Snap system. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among both the resins and the finishing/polishing techniques. For all resins, the use of diamond burs resulted in the greatest surface roughness (Ra: 0.69 to 1.44 µm). The lowest Ra means were obtained for the specimens treated with Sof-Lex discs (Ra: 0.11 to 0.25 µm). The Ra values of Durafill were lower than those of Perfection and Filtek Z250, and these in turn had lower Ra than the packable composite resins. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of Sof-Lex discs. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs and the association between rubber points and polishing pastes produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the packable and hybrid composite resins, respectively.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)UNESP Faculty of Dentistry of São Jose dos CamposUniversity of São Paulo Faculty of Dentistry of BauruFaculty of Dentistry of LinsUNESP Faculty of Dentistry of São Jose dos Campo

Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry- An update

In the more than 20 years that cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been available in dentistry, a lot has changed. The image quality has been greatly improved by better detectors and extraction algorithms. Moreover, the grading dose has been reduced by using pulsed beams, the possibility to select smaller fields of view and by the optimization of the reconstruction algorithms [1]. Most modern devices have many setting options, unlike the first generations of devices (Figure 1a and 1b). The field of view can be limited to 4x4cm or similar and the milliamperage, the number of basic projections, the spatial resolution, are all adjustable, so that the image quality and dose can be easily influenced. Something that is also required by the applicable guidelines. The devices have also become a lot more affordable over time. Actual equipment can be used for 2D and/or 3D images.</jats:p

One-stage full-mouth disinfection to overcome intra-oral transmission of periodontopathogens

The oral cavity offers a range of different niches where periodontopathogens can adhere and survive (e.g. the mucosa, the tongue, the tonsils, the saliva and all intra-oral hard surfaces such as teeth, dentures, oral implants). Transmission of bacteria from one niche to another is likely to occur. Recent studies, for example, illustrated that initially sterile abutments of oral implants were rapidly colonized by bacteria from the subgingival environment around teeth. This transmission of bacteria can occur spontaneously via the saliva, or by means of oral hygiene aids and/or dental instruments. Such an intra-oral transmission, if it occurs at a high speed, could jeopardize the outcome of periodontal therapy. To overcome a bacterial transmission, a 'one-stage full-mouth disinfection' was recently introduced for the treatment of periodontal infections. This new treatment strategy resulted in significant clinical and microbiological improvements when compared, with the standard sequential treatment. (C) 1997 Academic Press