395 research outputs found
The silence of self-knowledge
Gareth Evans famously affirmed an explanatory connection between answering the question whether p and knowing whether one believes that p. This is commonly interpreted in terms of the idea that judging that p constitutes an adequate basis for the belief that one believes that p. This paper formulates and defends an alternative, more modest interpretation, which develops from the suggestion that one can know that one believes that p in judging that p
Blind Rule-Following and the Regress of Motivations
Normativists about belief hold that belief formation is essentially rule- or norm-guided. On this view, certain norms are constitutive of or essential to belief in such a way that no mental state not guided by those norms counts as a belief, properly construed. In recent influential work, Kathrin GlĂŒer and Ă
sa Wikforss develop novel arguments against normativism. According to their regress of motivations argument, not all belief formation can be rule- or norm-guided, on pain of a vicious infinite regress. I argue that the regress of motivations argument is unsuccessful: an appeal to the notion of blind rule-following, drawn from a plausible interpretation of Ludwig Wittgensteinâs remarks on rule-following, stops the regress of motivations in its tracks
Small for gestational age: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data
Hard and Blind: On Wittgenstein's Genealogical View of Logical Necessity
My main aim is to sketch a certain reading (âgenealogical') of later Wittgenstein's views on logical necessity. Along the way, I engage with the inferentialism currently debated in the literature on the epistemology of deductive logic.publishedVersio
"Cognitive Penetrability" - Ch 3 of Seemings and Epistemic Justification
In this chapter I introduce the thesis that perceptual appearances are cognitively penetrable and analyse cases made against phenomenal conservatism hinging on this thesis. In particular, I focus on objections coming from the externalist reliabilist camp and the internalist inferentialist camp. I conclude that cognitive penetrability doesnât yield lethal or substantive difficulties for phenomenal conservatism
Recommended from our members
Further Reflections on the âPostmodern Turnâ in the Social Sciences: A Reply to William Outhwaite
I am immensely grateful to William Outhwaite for commenting on my book The âPostmodern Turnâ in the Social Sciences (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). I should stress at the outset that I agree with most of the points he makes in his commentary, which I find very insightful, thought-provoking, and constructive. Hence, any reader expecting to be entertained by a cockfight between book author and book reviewer will be disappointed. Let me take this opportunity to reflect on some of the main issues raised in Outhwaiteâs inspiring review
- âŠ