Contracting COVID-19: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of beliefs and knowledge

Recent work has found that an individual’s beliefs and personal characteristics can impact perceptionsof and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain individuals—such as those who are politicallyconservative or who endorse conspiracy theories—are less likely to engage in preventative behaviorslike social distancing. The current research aims to address whether these individual differencesnot only affect people’s reactions to the pandemic, but also their actual likelihood of contractingCOVID-19. In the early months of the pandemic, U.S. participants responded to a variety of individualdifference measures as well as questions specific to the pandemic itself. Four months later, 2120 ofthese participants responded with whether they had contracted COVID-19. Nearly all of our includedindividual difference measures significantly predicted whether a person reported testing positive forthe virus in this four-month period. Additional analyses revealed that all of these relationships wereprimarily mediated by whether participants held accurate knowledge about COVID-19. These findingsoffer useful insights for developing more effective interventions aimed at slowing the spread of bothCOVID-19 and future diseases. Moreover, some findings offer critical tests of the validity of suchtheoretical frameworks as those concerning conspiratorial ideation and disgust sensitivity within areal-world context.Social decision makin

Concern about salient pathogen threats increases sensitivity to disgust

Individuals vary in their sensitivity to disgust—differences that have implications for intergroup attitudes, political ideology, and beyond. However, the source of this variability in disgust sensitivity remains a subject of debate. In this work, we test the hypothesis that sensitivity to disgust is “calibrated” by an individual's concern about disease threats in their local ecology. Leveraging the COVID-19 pandemic, we obtain strong support for this hypothesis, finding that disgust sensitivity increased following the COVID-19 outbreak and that the degree of this increase was moderated by an individual's subjective concern about contracting the disease. This work fills a longstanding theoretical gap regarding the sources of variability in disgust sensitivity, while challenging the view that disgust sensitivity is an immutable individual difference. Given the role of disgust in motivating intergroup prejudice and political ideology, we anticipate that these increases in disgust sensitivity are likely to have important downstream societal implications.Social decision makin

Developing Cultural Self-Awareness: The First Step in Values Clarification for Early Interventionists

This article presents a discussion of the need for early interventionists to develop awareness of certain cultural assumptions underlying their practice. A wide range of literature on cultural differences is used to identify five areas of potential dissonance between professionals and families from culturally diverse backgrounds: interpretations of the meaning of disability; concepts of family structure and identity; goals of education; parent-child interaction, and communication style. It is argued that awareness of one's own cultural beliefs in these areas is an essential first step in developing effective collaboration with culturally different families