A collaboratively derived international research agenda on legislative science advice

© 2019, The Author(s). The quantity and complexity of scientific and technological information provided to policymakers have been on the rise for decades. Yet little is known about how to provide science advice to legislatures, even though scientific information is widely acknowledged as valuable for decision-making in many policy domains. We asked academics, science advisers, and policymakers from both developed and developing nations to identify, review and refine, and then rank the most pressing research questions on legislative science advice (LSA). Experts generally agree that the state of evidence is poor, especially regarding developing and lower-middle income countries. Many fundamental questions about science advice processes remain unanswered and are of great interest: whether legislative use of scientific evidence improves the implementation and outcome of social programs and policies; under what conditions legislators and staff seek out scientific information or use what is presented to them; and how different communication channels affect informational trust and use. Environment and health are the highest priority policy domains for the field. The context-specific nature of many of the submitted questions—whether to policy issues, institutions, or locations—suggests one of the significant challenges is aggregating generalizable evidence on LSA practices. Understanding these research needs represents a first step in advancing a global agenda for LSA research

Nutritional and herbal supplements for anxiety and anxiety-related disorders: systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Over the past several decades, complementary and alternative medications have increasingly become a part of everyday treatment. With the rising cost of prescription medications and their production of unwanted side effects, patients are exploring herbal and other natural remedies for the management and treatment of psychological conditions. Psychological disorders are one of the most frequent conditions seen by clinicians, and often require a long-term regimen of prescription medications. Approximately 6.8 million Americans suffer from generalized anxiety disorder. Many also suffer from the spectrum of behavioural and physical side effects that often accompany its treatment. It is not surprising that there is universal interest in finding effective natural anxiolytic (anti-anxiety) treatments with a lower risk of adverse effects or withdrawal.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An electronic and manual search was performed through MEDLINE/PubMed and EBSCO. Articles were not discriminated by date of publication. Available clinical studies published in English that used human participants and examined the anxiolytic potential of dietary and herbal supplements were included. Data were extracted and compiled into tables that included the study design, sample population, intervention, control, length of treatment, outcomes, direction of evidence, and reported adverse events.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 24 studies that investigated five different CAM monotherapies and eight different combination treatments and involved 2619 participants met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There were 21 randomized controlled trials and three open-label, uncontrolled observational studies. Most studies involved patients who had been diagnosed with either an anxiety disorder or depression (n = 1786). However, eight studies used healthy volunteers (n = 877) who had normal levels of anxiety, were undergoing surgery, tested at the upper limit of the normal range of a trait anxiety scale, had adverse premenstrual symptoms or were peri-menopausal, reported anxiety and insomnia, or had one month or more of elevated generalized anxiety. Heterogeneity and the small number of studies for each supplement or combination therapy prevented a formal meta-analysis. Of the randomized controlled trials reviewed, 71% (15 out of 21) showed a positive direction of evidence. Any reported side effects were mild to moderate.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Based on the available evidence, it appears that nutritional and herbal supplementation is an effective method for treating anxiety and anxiety-related conditions without the risk of serious side effects. There is the possibility that any positive effects seen could be due to a placebo effect, which may have a significant psychological impact on participants with mental disorders. However, based on this systematic review, strong evidence exists for the use of herbal supplements containing extracts of passionflower or kava and combinations of L-lysine and L-arginine as treatments for anxiety symptoms and disorders. Magnesium-containing supplements and other herbal combinations may hold promise, but more research is needed before these products can be recommended to patients. St. John's wort monotherapy has insufficient evidence for use as an effective anxiolytic treatment.</p

Perfil de utilização de medicamentos em idosos da zona urbana de Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil Use of medicines by the elderly in Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

Os medicamentos representam um dos itens mais importantes da atenção à saúde do idoso. Estes particularmente utilizam múltiplos medicamentos apresentando mais reações adversas. O estudo objetivou avaliar o perfil do consumo de medicamentos por idosos. Desenvolveu-se um estudo epidemiológico transversal mediante entrevistas domiciliares, numa amostra aleatória de 294 idosos, residentes em Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Os idosos representam 9% da população. Os resultados evidenciaram consumo médio de 2,79 medicamentos por idoso. O coeficiente de prevalência do uso de medicamentos na última semana foi de 82%, dos 827 medicamentos utilizados pelos idosos 794 (96%), foram prescritos. As classes farmacológicas mais utilizadas foram os anti-hipertensivos (21,3%) e diuréticos (11,3%). A prevalência do uso de medicamentos foi comparável ao encontrado em outros estudos, confirmando a importância dos medicamentos na atenção à saúde do idoso. A porcentagem de medicamentos utilizados sem prescrição médica foi baixa. Os medicamentos e forma de apresentação mais freqüentemente relatados foram os usualmente prescritos e dispensados gratuitamente na rede básica de saúde do município que está estruturada há mais de 10 anos com quase 100% de cobertura.<br>Medicines are one of the most important health care items for the elderly, who are particularly prone to use multiple drugs with a higher number of adverse reactions. The current study aimed to assess the profile of pharmaceutical consumption by the elderly. A cross-sectional epidemiological study used household interviews in a random sample of 294 elderly living in Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. The elderly represent 9% of the local population. The results showed a mean consumption of 2.79 medicines per individual. The prevalence rate for use of medicines in the previous week was 82%, and of the 827 medicines used by the elderly, 794 (96%) had been prescribed. The most widely used pharmacological classes were anti-hypertensives (21.3%) and diuretics (11.3%). Prevalence of pharmaceutical use was comparable to the results from other studies, thus confirming the importance of medicines in the health of the elderly. The percentage of medicines used without a medical prescription was low. The most frequently reported medicines and formulations were those usually prescribed and dispensed free of cost in the municipal basic health care system, which has been organized for more than 10 years, with coverage of nearly 100%