Terrestrial vertebrate survey of Motukawanui

Acknowledgements The authors thank the kaumātua roopu of Ngāti Kura for permission to visit the island, Rod Hitchmough for information on reptile species, Maud Quinzin for help in rat trapping, Rod Brown for information on restoration planting, and Graeme Taylor for providing a copy of the unpublished DOC report on the Cavalli Islands. Z.T.C. personally thanks Dean Wright (of Dean Wright Photography; https://www.deanwright.co.nz/) and Stephen Western (of Stephen Western Photography; https://stephenwestern.smugmug.com/) for help in providing photo comparisons. TriOceans provided transport to and from the island. Funding The fieldwork of this study was independently funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 747120 awarded to T. W. B. Research was performed under the University of Auckland animal ethics R2095 and wildlife authority 67914-DOA and research and collection authority 67915-RES. Funding was awarded to Z. T. C. by the New Zealand Government through a New Zealand International Doctoral Research Scholarship.Peer reviewedPostprin

Systematic prey preference by introduced mice exhausts the ecosystem on Antipodes Island

For assistance collecting samples in the field the authors thank David Thompson, Erica Sommer, David Boyle and Mark Fraser in summer 2011, Helen Nathan, Terry Greene and Graeme Elliott in winter 2013, Fin Cox in autumn 2016 and Jose Luis Herrera in winter 2016. Thanks to the Department of Conservation, Murihiku, for logistical support, and Hank Haazen and crew of the Tiama for transport. Funding was provided for the summer 2011 expedition by NIWA and winter 2013 expedition by the National Geographic Society (Grant No. 9322-13). Thanks to Stephen Thorpe, Robert Hoare, and John Marris for taxonomic identification of invertebrate samples. Thanks to Surrya Khanam for laboratory sorting, Julie Brown and Anna Kilimnik for stable isotope laboratory analyses and Wendy Nelson for macroalgae identification. JCR is currently funded by the Royal Society of New Zealand Rutherford Discovery Fellowship (Grant No. RDF-UOA1404). TWB is currently funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship (Grant No. 747120). Thanks to Katherine Russell and two anonymous reviewers for feedback on the manuscript. This research was conducted under DOC entry (SO-29716-LND 1011/35) and research (SO-29140-FAU 1011/20) permits, and University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee approval (R845).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Gannets are not attracted to fishing vessels in Iceland-potential influence of a discard ban and food availability

BLC was supported by a NERC GW4+ Doctoral Training Partnership studentship from the Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L002434/1]. We thank Ólafur Torfason, Niall Tierney, and Rachel Stroud for fieldwork assistance in Skrúður, and Mamma-Rósa for food and housing in Vestmannaeyjar. We thank the Hellisey hunting club for the use of cabin and assistance with boat trips to Hellisey. We thank Filipa Samarra, Miguel Neves, Gary Haskins, and team members in the Icelandic Orca Project for boat trips to Hellisey. We thank Lucy Hawkes, David Pascall, Alice Williams, Richard Phillips, Brendan Godley and all reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript. The GPS tracking data are available through the BirdLife International Seabird Tracking Database (http://www.seabirdtracking.org).Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Economic costs of protecting islands from invasive alien species

Funding Information: This work was conducted following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA‐Belmont Forum Project “Alien Scenarios” (BL: FWF project no. I 4011‐B32). The authors also acknowledge the French National Research Agency (ANR‐14‐CE02‐0021) and the BNP‐Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project and enabling the construction of the database, with particular thanks to C. Diagne. T.W.B. acknowledges funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program Marie Skłodowska‐Curie fellowship (grant 747120). J.F.L. thanks the Auburn University School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences for travel support to attend the InvaCost workshop. Funding for E.A. came from the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of the University of Paris Saclay. We also thank J. Albers and 2 anonymous reviewers and for their comments that strengthened this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Economic costs of invasive rodents worldwide : the tip of the iceberg

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are extremely grateful to the organizers of the InvaCost workshop that allowed the genesis of this project, as well as to all contacted people who kindly answered to our requests for information about the costs of invasive rodents. We thank L. Nuninger and C. Assailly for their work in the initial project, and María Angulo and Nuria Cerdá for their help in generating the Fig. 3. Last, the authors thank Dr. Steffen Oppel and another anonymous reviewer for their thorough revision of the article which greatly improved it. Funding Information: This work was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the Invacost project which allowed the construction of the InvaCost database. This work was initiated following a workshop funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology. This research was also funded through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme. Funds for Elena Angulo and Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia came from the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of University Paris Saclay. Christophe Diagne was funded by the BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project ‘‘Alien Scenarios’’ (BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C). Ross N. Cuthbert received funding from the Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2021-001). Thomas W. Bodey received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellowship (Grant No. 747120). Jean Fantle-Lepczyk received travel support to attend the Invacost workshop from Auburn University School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Intraguild processes drive space‐use patterns in a large‐bodied marine predator community

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We dedicate this paper to the memory of Samuel (‘Doc’) Gruber who passed away before the completion of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Bimini Biological Field Station Foundation staff and volunteers, and funded by Save Our Seas Foundation, Swiss Shark Foundation (Hai Stiftung) and Guy Harvey Ocean Foundation. We are grateful for the unwavering support provided by Bimini Scuba Center. We thank Volker Grimm, A. Bradley Duthie and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript. This is publication # 1708 from the Institute of Environment at Florida International University.Peer reviewe

Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions

Biological invasions are a global challenge that has received insufficient attention. Recently available cost syntheses have provided policy- and decision makers with reliable and up-to-date information on the economic impacts of biological invasions, aiming to motivate effective management. The resultant InvaCost database is now publicly and freely accessible and enables rapid extraction of monetary cost information. This has facilitated knowledge sharing, developed a more integrated and multidisciplinary network of researchers, and forged multidisciplinary collaborations among diverse organizations and stakeholders. Over 50 scientific publications so far have used the database and have provided detailed assessments of invasion costs across geographic, taxonomic, and spatiotemporal scales. These studies have provided important information that can guide future policy and legislative decisions on the management of biological invasions while simultaneously attracting public and media attention. We provide an overview of the improved availability, reliability, standardization, and defragmentation of monetary costs; discuss how this has enhanced invasion science as a discipline; and outline directions for future development

Leveraging Motivations, Personality, and Sensory Cues for Vertebrate Pest Management

Acknowledgments: We wish to thank Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research staff, particularly Peter Millard and Bruce Warburton, for facilitating and supporting this research. Thanks to Jenna Bytheway for infographic design. This research was supported by Strategic Science Investment funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group, awarded to Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. T.W.B. was supported by Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant number 747120, and A.S. was supported by National Science Foundation grant IOS 1456724.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Benefits do not balance costs of biological invasions

Acknowledgments LC was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (Capes)—(001). RNC is funded by the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. ECF-2021-001). CJAB is supported by the Australian Research Council (grant no. CE170100015). SB was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation through grants no. 31003A_179491 and no. 31BD30_184114. FC is supported by the Biological Invasion Chair of the AXA Research Fund of University Paris Saclay and a salary from the French CNRS.Peer reviewe

Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide

Funding Information: The authors thank the French National Research Agency (ANR-14-CE02-0021) and the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative for funding the InvaCost project and the work on InvaCost database development. The present work was conducted in the frame of InvaCost workshop carried in November 2019 (Paris, France) and funded by the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology and is part of the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios. RNC was funded through a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship (ECF-2021-001) from the Leverhulme Trust and a Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. DAA is funded by the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) (PR1914SM-01) and the Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST) internal seed funds (187092 & 234597). CA was funded by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). TWB acknowledges funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme Marie Skodowska-Curie fellowship (Grant No. 747120). FE was funded through the 2017?2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the funding organisation Austrian Science Foundation FWF (grant I 4011-B32). NK is funded by the basic project of Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Russia (Project No. 0287-2021-0011; data mining) and the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 21-16-00050; data analysis).Peer reviewedPublisher PD