Association of kidney disease measures with risk of renal function worsening in patients with type 1 diabetes

Background: Albuminuria has been classically considered a marker of kidney damage progression in diabetic patients and it is routinely assessed to monitor kidney function. However, the role of a mild GFR reduction on the development of stage 653 CKD has been less explored in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic role of kidney disease measures, namely albuminuria and reduced GFR, on the development of stage 653 CKD in a large cohort of patients affected by T1DM. Methods: A total of 4284 patients affected by T1DM followed-up at 76 diabetes centers participating to the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD) initiative constitutes the study population. Urinary albumin excretion (ACR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) were retrieved and analyzed. The incidence of stage 653 CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or eGFR reduction > 30% from baseline was evaluated. Results: The mean estimated GFR was 98 \ub1 17 mL/min/1.73m2 and the proportion of patients with albuminuria was 15.3% (n = 654) at baseline. About 8% (n = 337) of patients developed one of the two renal endpoints during the 4-year follow-up period. Age, albuminuria (micro or macro) and baseline eGFR < 90 ml/min/m2 were independent risk factors for stage 653 CKD and renal function worsening. When compared to patients with eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73m2 and normoalbuminuria, those with albuminuria at baseline had a 1.69 greater risk of reaching stage 3 CKD, while patients with mild eGFR reduction (i.e. eGFR between 90 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) show a 3.81 greater risk that rose to 8.24 for those patients with albuminuria and mild eGFR reduction at baseline. Conclusions: Albuminuria and eGFR reduction represent independent risk factors for incident stage 653 CKD in T1DM patients. The simultaneous occurrence of reduced eGFR and albuminuria have a synergistic effect on renal function worsening

Plasma visfatin concentrations after a lifestyle intervention were directly associated with inflammatory markers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The biological activity and regulation of the novel adipokine visfatin are still largely unknown. Our aim was to evaluate if visfatin plasma concentrations may be influenced by a lifestyle intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of 335 dysmetabolic patients from a population-based cohort, randomized to receive a lifestyle intervention program (intervention group) or family physician usual care (controls), 20 patients per group were randomly selected for plasma visfatin determination. The before-after variation (Delta) in visfatin concentration at 1-year from randomization, and the correlations between (Delta)visfatin and intervention-induced changes in waist circumference, fasting glucose, markers of inflammation, and oxidative stress were evaluated. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in waist circumference, and many metabolic/inflammatory variables, while the controls worsened. Visfatin concentrations slightly decreased in the former and significantly increased in the controls ((Delta)visfatin=-2.4 vs 66.0 ng/ml, p<0.001). In robust regression models, the following variables resulted associated with (Delta)visfatin: (Delta)waist circumference, (Delta)fasting glucose, (Delta)hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and (Delta)TNFalpha (tumor necrosis factor-alpha). Significant effects on (Delta)visfatin of (Delta)TNFalpha (beta=16.8; 6.1-25.6; p=0.003) and, modified by group, of (Delta)hs-CRP (beta=29.8; 95% CI 15.4-44.2; p<0.001 and beta=4.2; 2.9-5.5; p<0.001 in the control and intervention group, respectively) were detected. By controlling for (Delta)waist, the effects of (Delta)TNFalpha and of (Delta)hs-CRP on (Delta)visfatin by group did not change, while (Delta)waist was no longer associated. The association between (Delta)visfatin and (Delta)glucose was no longer significant, after adjusting for (Delta)hs-CRP. CONCLUSION: Visfatin values increased with waist circumference and were associated with variations of inflammatory markers, suggesting participation in inflammatory mechanisms