Faux amis roumaino-croate

U radu se iznose tzv. lažni parovi (prijatelji), leksemi u hrvatskom i rumunjskom jeziku koji zbog svoje izrazne podudarnosti navode na pogrešno prevođenje. Navode se značajke koje su dovele do takvih pojava. S obzirom na podrijetlo, najčešće je riječ o leksemima naslijeđenima iz latinskoga jezika ili kasnijim romanizmima te dakako slavenskima, kojih je u rumunjskome nezanemariv broj. Izdvojeni se leksemi razvrstavaju u tablicu koja omogućuje njihovu prozirniju usporedbu i lakše prepoznavanje.L’article traite des faux amis en croate et roumain, mots qui ont la męme forme dans les deux langues mais pas le męme sens. On cherche ŕ trouver parmi ces deux langues les marques principales attribuées ŕ cette notion. On constate que la plupart de ces mots proviennent soit du latin soit du vieux slave. L’article comporte un tableau qui présente la liste des faux amis accompagnée de définitions

Neke mogućnosti prilagodbe francuskoga jezikoslovnoga nazivlja hrvatskomu jeziku

Osvr

General principles of the classification into conjugational types in Croatian compared to some closely related languages

U prvom se dijelu rada uspoređuju osnovne podjele glagola na konjugacijske vrste u hrvatskom jeziku od prvih gramatičkih opisa do danas. Gledaju se njihova opća načela podjele: hijerarhijska složenost i broj kategorija te opći redoslijed. Potom se hrvatske podjele uspoređuju s onima u nekim slaven- skim jezicima: bosanskome (bošnjačkome), srpskome, slovenskome, make- donskome, ruskome i češkome. Iznose se sličnosti i razlike koje proizlaze iz teorijskoga i metodološkoga pristupa s jedne strane i samih morfoloških i fonoloških obilježja svojstvenih pojedinomu jeziku s druge.In the first part of the paper the author briefly presents basic classifica- tions of verbs into conjugational classes (types) in Croatian from the ear- liest grammatical descriptions which divided verbs into three conjugational classes according to the present morphemes (Kašić 1604, Della Bella 1728, Voltić 1803, Starčević 1812), through Babukić’s grammar (1836) where Do- brovski’s classification according to the infinitive morphemes was applied and other 19th and 20th century grammatical classifications to the latest: Jelaska (2003, 2005) where three groups (present morpheme) with ten types (infinitive vs. present morphemes) and nine classes for athematic verbs were introduced; and Bošnjak Botica (2011) where all but the first two types were complemented by additional classes (morpho-semantic criteria). A few clas- sifications from their general principles of classification have been analyzed: hierarchical complexity, number of category and order. In the second part of the paper, the Croatian classifications are compared to those in some other Slavic languages: Bosnian (Jahić, Halilović, Palić (2000), Serbian (Belić 1956, 2006, Klajn 2005), Slovenian (Toporišić 2004), Macedonian (Koneski 1981), Russian (Russkaja gramatika AN 1980, Rozental’ i dr. 2003, Bud- mani 1920) and Czech (Komárek i dr. 1986). Similarities and differences are presented, those that arise from various theoretical and methodological approaches and those that stem from the morphological and phonological features inherent to every language

Novi prijedlozi u hrvatskom rječotvorju

Ivan Branko Šamija: Hrvatski rječotvornik, Društvo Lovrećana Zagreb: Zagreb 2011, 429 str