131 research outputs found

    PCN54 Hospital Costs Related to Hepatitis C Virus Infection: First Analysis of the French Hospital National Data Base

    Get PDF

    FGFR1 and WT1 are markers of human prostate cancer progression

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Androgen-independent prostate adenocarcinomas are responsible for about 6% of overall cancer deaths in men. METHODS: We used DNA microarrays to identify genes related to the transition between androgen-dependent and androgen-independent stages in the LuCaP 23.1 xenograft model of prostate adenocarcinoma. The expression of the proteins encoded by these genes was then assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (TMA) including human prostate carcinoma samples issued from 85 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: FGFR1, TACC1 and WT1 gene expression levels were associated with the androgen-independent stage in xenografts and human prostate carcinoma samples. MART1 protein expression was correlated with pT2 tumor stages. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that each of these four genes may play a role, or at least reflect a stage of prostate carcinoma growth/development/progression

    01, Texts of Time: The Portland State Library Book of Hours and the Medieval Manuscript Tradition Exhibit Catalog

    Get PDF
    This is the catalog for the exhibit Texts of Time: The Portland State Library Book of Hours and the Medieval Manuscript Traditionhttps://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/textsoftime/1011/thumbnail.jp

    MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis

    Get PDF
    Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. Methods In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. Results A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). Conclusions The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027 .)

    The effect of osteoprotegerin administration on the intra-tibial growth of the osteoblastic LuCaP 23.1 prostate cancer xenograft

    Full text link
    Osteoprotegerin (OPG) plays a central role in controlling bone resorption. Exogenous administration of OPG has been shown to be effective in preventing osteolysis and limiting the growth of osteolytic metastasis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of OPG on osteoblastic prostate cancer (CaP) metastases in an animal model. LuCaP 23.1 cells were injected intra-tibially and Fc-OPG (6.0 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously three times a week starting either 24 hours prior to cell injection (prevention regimen) or at 4 weeks post-injection (treatment regimen). Changes in bone mineral density at the tumor site were determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Tumor growth was monitored by evaluating serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Fc-OPG did not inhibit establishment of osteoblastic bone lesions of LuCaP 23.1, but it decreased growth of the tumor cells, as determined by decreases in serum PSA levels of 73.0 ± 44.3% ( P < 0.001) and 78.3 ± 25.3% ( P < 0.001) under the treatment and prevention regimens, respectively, compared to the untreated tumor-bearing animals. Administration of Fc-OPG decreased the proliferative index by 35.0% ( P = 0.1838) in the treatment group, and 75.2% ( P = 0.0358) in the prevention group. The results of this study suggest a potential role for OPG in the treatment of established osteoblastic CaP bone metastases.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42587/1/10585_2004_Article_2869.pd

    05, Latin, Vernacular Language, and Personal Devotion in the Portland State Book of Hours

    Get PDF
    Matthias Bladou describes the use of Latin and vernacular French in the Book of Hours, and how language reflected a more personal use of prayer texts in the fifteenth century.https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/textsoftime/1002/thumbnail.jp

    Neuromodulation sacrée S3 et troubles mictionnels réfractaires@ (technique chirurgicale et résultats)

    No full text
    AIX-MARSEILLE2-BU Méd/Odontol. (130552103) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Does teaching of robotic partial nephrectomy affect renal function and perioperative outcomes?

    No full text
    Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents the treatment of choice for localized renal tumor&lt;7cm. Minimally invasive approaches are considered standard of care in many institutions. Maintaining acceptable warm ischemic time (WIT) while teaching robotic PN (RPN) remains challenging. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of teaching RPN on WIT and renal function in patients undergoing RPN. Patients undergoing RPN for cT1-T2 renal tumors were included. RENAL nephrometry score was used to adjust for tumor complexity. Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were determined preoperatively, at day 2 and at ≥3-month follow-up. Patients in whom the attending surgeon (staff) performed tumorectomy and renorraphy were compared with those in whom the fellow performed these steps. Primary outcomes were WIT and GFR decrease at follow-up visit. Morbidity and margin positivity represented secondary outcomes. Overall, 69 patients (46 "staff" vs. 23 "fellow") were included. Patient׳s characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In particular, RENAL score and preoperative GFR were similar between both groups. Mean WIT was 22±9 in the staff and 24±7 in the fellow group (P = 0.09). At follow-up, a GFR reduction of 9% was observed in the staff group vs. 13% in the fellow group (P = 0.38). Complication rates (13% vs. 17%, P = 0.63) and positive margins (9% vs. 4%, P = 0.47) did not differ significantly between staff and fellow. In our experience, teaching RPN with a strict supervision and stepwise standardized procedure was oncologically and functionally safe after 3 to 6 months of follow-up
    corecore