EU-tilskud til trafikforskning

I transportprogrammet under EU’s 7. rammeprogram (FP7) er der afsat 28 mia kr til trafikforskning i perioden 2007-1013. Der er ansøgningsfrist en gang om året, næste gang er i maj 2008. Transportprogrammet støtter forskning, der fremmer udvikling af integrerede, grønnere og mere intelligente paneuropæiske transportsystemer inden for luftfart, vejtransport, jernbane og skibsfart, f.eks. fremtidens “rene og sikre bil”, sammenkoblingsmuligheder og intermodalitet med særligt fokus på jernbanetransporten, overkommelige priser, sikkerhed, kapacitet og miljøkonsekvenser i et udvidet EU

EU støtte til trafikforskning 2005

Information om mulighederne for EU-støtte til trafikforskning. Præsentationen er en opfølgning på en tilsvarende præsentation givet udenfor det officielle program i 2004. Informationerne vil være nye og rettet mod den kommende indkaldelse efter projektforslag med deadline september 2005

The Spared Nerve Injury (SNI) Model of Induced Mechanical Allodynia in Mice

Peripheral neuropathic pain is a severe chronic pain condition which may result from trauma to sensory nerves in the peripheral nervous system. The spared nerve injury (SNI) model induces symptoms of neuropathic pain such as mechanical allodynia i.e. pain due to tactile stimuli that do not normally provoke a painful response [1]

Colorectal cancer mortality 10 years after a single round of guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening:experiences from a Danish screening cohort

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer. Randomised trials have shown that guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening can reduce CRC mortality, but a recent large randomised study from Finland did not find any effect. A feasibility study was carried out in Denmark in 2005–2006 where residents aged 50–74 years in 2 Danish counties were invited once to participate in gFOBT screening. We used the unique Danish registers to assess the impact of gFOBT screening in this group on CRC incidence and mortality. METHODS: In this cohort study, we followed a group comprising 166 277 individuals invited to screening and a reference group comprising the remaining 1 240 348 Danes of the same age. We linked the Danish population and health service registers to obtain information about colonoscopies, polypectomies, incident CRC and cause of death. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 8.9 years, the CRC mortality was significantly lower in the screening group than in the reference group with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.92 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.99), while the aHR for all-cause mortality was 0.95 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.96). For screening participants, the aHR for CRC mortality and all-cause mortality was 0.72 (0.64 to 0.80) and 0.59 (0.57 to 0.60), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: About 10 years after a single round of gFOBT screening, we found a significant 8% deficit in CRC mortality in the screening group compared with other Danes. We found almost the same deficit in all-cause mortality, and on this basis, it is not possible to conclude that one screening round had an effect on CRC mortality. Our study indicated that close monitoring of the outcome of CRC screening is warranted

Interventions to Prevent Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations:A Mixed Methods Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The demand for healthcare is increasing due to an aging population, more people living with chronic diseases and medical comorbidities. To manage this demand, political institutions call for action to reduce the potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Quantitative and qualitative aspects should be considered to understand how and why interventions work, and for whom. The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to identify and synthesize evidence on interventions targeting avoidable hospitalizations from the perspectives of the citizens and the healthcare professionals to improve the preventive healthcare services. METHODS AND RESULTS: A mixed methods systematic review was conducted following the JBI methodology using a convergent integrated approach to synthesis. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, reg. no. CRD42020134652. A systematic search was undertaken in six databases. In total, 45 articles matched the eligibility criteria, and 25 of these (five qualitative studies and 20 quantitative studies) were found to be of acceptable methodological quality. From the 25 articles, 99 meaning units were extracted. The combined evidence revealed four categories, which were synthesized into two integrated findings: (1) Addressing individual needs through care continuity and coordination prevent avoidable hospitalizations and (2) Recognizing preventive care as an integrated part of the healthcare work to prevent avoidable hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The syntheses highlight the importance of addressing individual needs through continuous and coordinated care practices to prevent avoidable hospitalizations. Engaging healthcare professionals in preventive care work and considering implications for patient safety may be given higher priority. Healthcare administers and policy-makers could support the delivery of preventive care through targeted educational material aimed at healthcare professionals and simple web-based IT platforms for information-sharing across healthcare settings. The findings are an important resource in the development and implementation of interventions to prevent avoidable hospitalizations, and may serve to improve patient safety and quality in preventive healthcare services. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=134652, identifier: CRD42020134652