10 research outputs found
Adipokines Are Markers of Metabolic Health
Background: Heterogeneity in metabolic risk among individuals in similar weight categories is linked to differential cardiovascular risk. Adipokines secreted from adipose tissue are linked to metabolic activity, but it is unknown whether they distinguish between individuals with similar weight who are metabolically âhealthyâ versus unhealthy.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 10,906 ARIC participants (1990-1992) using logistic regression to evaluate the associations of adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, and leptin/adiponectin ratio) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) components and with three levels of metabolic risk: metabolically healthy (no metabolic syndrome [MetS]), metabolically unhealthy (MetS present), and metabolically healthy with diabetes. Analyses were performed in the overall population and stratified by obesity (BMI â„30 kg/m2), with tests for interaction.
Results: Among all participants, 51% (n=5580) were metabolically healthy, 37% (n=3997) were metabolically unhealthy, and 12% (n=238) were metabolically unhealthy with diabetes. The top versus the bottom tertile of adiponectin was strongly associated with a lower likelihood of being metabolically unhealthy (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.17) or metabolically unhealthy with diabetes (OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.05) relative to being metabolically healthy. Conversely, the top versus the bottom leptin tertile was associated with higher likelihood of being metabolically unhealthy (OR: 5.10, 95% CI: 4.29, 6.06) and metabolically unhealthy with diabetes (OR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.72, 3.13). The strongest metabolic risk associations were seen for the leptin/adiponectin ratio (OR: 19.7, 95% CI: 14.7, 26.3 for metabolically unhealthy with diabetes versus metabolically healthy). Interactions with obesity status were seen for leptin and leptin/adiponectin ratio (p<0.0001), with stronger association among those without obesity.
Conclusions: Adipokines may help to differentiate individuals in the same weight category with different degrees of metabolic risk. Future studies should examine the utility of targeting adipokines to improve metabolic health and reduce cardiovascular risk
External validation of the Toronto hepatocellular carcinoma risk index in Turkish cirrhotic patients
Recommended from our members
Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes presentation and progression suggests that precision medicine interventions could improve clinical outcomes. We undertook a systematic review to determine whether strategies to subclassify type 2 diabetes were associated with high quality evidence, reproducible results and improved outcomes for patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for publications that used 'simple subclassification' approaches using simple categorisation of clinical characteristics, or 'complex subclassification' approaches which used machine learning or 'omics approaches in people with established type 2 diabetes. We excluded other diabetes subtypes and those predicting incident type 2 diabetes. We assessed quality, reproducibility and clinical relevance of extracted full-text articles and qualitatively synthesised a summary of subclassification approaches. RESULTS: Here we show data from 51 studies that demonstrate many simple stratification approaches, but none have been replicated and many are not associated with meaningful clinical outcomes. Complex stratification was reviewed in 62 studies and produced reproducible subtypes of type 2 diabetes that are associated with outcomes. Both approaches require a higher grade of evidence but support the premise that type 2 diabetes can be subclassified into clinically meaningful subtypes. CONCLUSION: Critical next steps toward clinical implementation are to test whether subtypes exist in more diverse ancestries and whether tailoring interventions to subtypes will improve outcomes
Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine
Precision medicine is part of the logical evolution of contemporary evidence-based medicine that seeks to reduce errors and optimize outcomes when making medical decisions and health recommendations. Diabetes affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, many of whom will develop life-threatening complications and die prematurely. Precision medicine can potentially address this enormous problem by accounting for heterogeneity in the etiology, clinical presentation and pathogenesis of common forms of diabetes and risks of complications. This second international consensus report on precision diabetes medicine summarizes the findings from a systematic evidence review across the key pillars of precision medicine (prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) in four recognized forms of diabetes (monogenic, gestational, type 1, type 2). These reviews address key questions about the translation of precision medicine research into practice. Although not complete, owing to the vast literature on this topic, they revealed opportunities for the immediate or near-term clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine; furthermore, we expose important gaps in knowledge, focusing on the need to obtain new clinically relevant evidence. Gaps include the need for common standards for clinical readiness, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, health equity, predictive accuracy, liability and accessibility. Key milestones are outlined for the broad clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine.</p
Recommended from our members
Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine
Precision medicine is part of the logical evolution of contemporary evidence-based medicine that seeks to reduce errors and optimize outcomes when making medical decisions and health recommendations. Diabetes affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, many of whom will develop life-threatening complications and die prematurely. Precision medicine can potentially address this enormous problem by accounting for heterogeneity in the etiology, clinical presentation and pathogenesis of common forms of diabetes and risks of complications. This second international consensus report on precision diabetes medicine summarizes the findings from a systematic evidence review across the key pillars of precision medicine (prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) in four recognized forms of diabetes (monogenic, gestational, type 1, type 2). These reviews address key questions about the translation of precision medicine research into practice. Although not complete, owing to the vast literature on this topic, they revealed opportunities for the immediate or near-term clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine; furthermore, we expose important gaps in knowledge, focusing on the need to obtain new clinically relevant evidence. Gaps include the need for common standards for clinical readiness, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, health equity, predictive accuracy, liability and accessibility. Key milestones are outlined for the broad clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine
Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine
Abstract: Precision medicine is part of the logical evolution of contemporary evidence-based medicine that seeks to reduce errors and optimize outcomes when making medical decisions and health recommendations. Diabetes affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, many of whom will develop life-threatening complications and die prematurely. Precision medicine can potentially address this enormous problem by accounting for heterogeneity in the etiology, clinical presentation and pathogenesis of common forms of diabetes and risks of complications. This second international consensus report on precision diabetes medicine summarizes the findings from a systematic evidence review across the key pillars of precision medicine (prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) in four recognized forms of diabetes (monogenic, gestational, type 1, type 2). These reviews address key questions about the translation of precision medicine research into practice. Although not complete, owing to the vast literature on this topic, they revealed opportunities for the immediate or near-term clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine; furthermore, we expose important gaps in knowledge, focusing on the need to obtain new clinically relevant evidence. Gaps include the need for common standards for clinical readiness, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, health equity, predictive accuracy, liability and accessibility. Key milestones are outlined for the broad clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine. A systematic review of evidence, across the key pillars of prevention, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis, outlines milestones that need to be met to enable the broad clinical implementation of precision medicine in diabetes care
Second international consensus report on gaps and opportunities for the clinical translation of precision diabetes medicine
Precision medicine is part of the logical evolution of contemporary evidence-based medicine that seeks to reduce errors and optimize outcomes when making medical decisions and health recommendations. Diabetes affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide, many of whom will develop life-threatening complications and die prematurely. Precision medicine can potentially address this enormous problem by accounting for heterogeneity in the etiology, clinical presentation and pathogenesis of common forms of diabetes and risks of complications. This second international consensus report on precision diabetes medicine summarizes the findings from a systematic evidence review across the key pillars of precision medicine (prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) in four recognized forms of diabetes (monogenic, gestational, type 1, type 2). These reviews address key questions about the translation of precision medicine research into practice. Although not complete, owing to the vast literature on this topic, they revealed opportunities for the immediate or near-term clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine; furthermore, we expose important gaps in knowledge, focusing on the need to obtain new clinically relevant evidence. Gaps include the need for common standards for clinical readiness, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, health equity, predictive accuracy, liability and accessibility. Key milestones are outlined for the broad clinical implementation of precision diabetes medicine.</p