Systematic review and meta-analysis: Opportunistic infections and malignancies during treatment with anti-integrin antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease

Background: Anti-integrin antibodies are effective therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, these drugs carry theoretical risks of opportunistic infection and malignancy. Aim: To pool data from all placebo-controlled studies, to estimate risk of opportunistic infection or malignancy with anti-integrin antibodies. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched (up to December 2014). Randomised placebo-controlled trials of anti-integrin antibodies in adults with active or quiescent CD or UC were eligible. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of opportunistic infection or malignancy, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The search strategy identified 1579 citations, 12 of which were eligible (four trials of natalizumab, six of vedolizumab and two of etrolizumab). The RR of developing an opportunistic infection was not significantly higher with non-gut specific (2.34; 95% CI 0.05-108.72) or gut specific anti-integrin antibodies (1.55; 95% CI 0.16-14.83). The RR was generally higher in trials of non-gut specific anti-integrin antibodies with duration of therapy ≥52 weeks (RR = 15.00; 95% CI 0.86-261), but remained non-significant. The RR of malignancy was not elevated with non-gut specific (1.57; 95% CI 0.19-12.74) or gut specific anti-integrin antibodies (0.78; 95% CI 0.15-4.02). Conclusions: Absolute numbers of opportunistic infections were higher with anti-integrin antibodies, but this difference is not statistically significant. There was no increased risk of malignancy detected. Long-term data in large prospective cohorts are needed to further assess this issue

HANDBOOK OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

xiii,177 hlm; 13 x 20 c

Adalimumab treatment in Crohn's disease: an overview of long-term efficacy and safety in light of the EXTEND trial

Amon Asgharpour, Jianfeng Cheng, Stephen J Bickston VCUHS Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Center, Richmond, VA, USA Abstract: The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Adalimumab is a subcutaneous anti-TNF agent indicated for use in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and those with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. In both diseases, it can be used for both induction of remission and for maintenance of remission. This review focuses on its use in Crohn's disease as described in the EXTEND (Extend the Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab through Endoscopic Healing) trial. Several clinical trials using traditional instruments to measure clinical response have had endoscopic substudies looking for endoscopic healing. The EXTEND trial is the first to use mucosal healing on endoscopy as a primary endpoint for patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and baseline ulcerative disease treated with continuous adalimumab. In this well designed trial, the primary endpoint was narrowly missed, but the secondary endpoints further the notion that mucosal healing should be a more mainstream measure of drug efficacy. How this will translate from clinical trials to the clinic is not yet clear, but identifying noninvasive markers for mucosal healing, and understanding the implications of mucosal healing for safety, resource utilization, and quality of life are all worthy targets for further study. The aim of this review is to understand the role of mucosal healing, safety profile, and efficacy in patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, with particular attention to adalimumab and the EXTEND trial. Keywords: Crohn's disease, tumor necrosis factor, adalimumab, clinical trials, inflammatory bowel diseas