389 research outputs found

    Clinical efficacy of the radius bone plates for the fixation of radius bone fractures

    Get PDF
    Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the radius bone plates fixation for treating radius bone fracture.Methods: Forty-Five patients with fracture of the radius involving the distal part were treated with fixed angle plate fixation approach. This was a retrospective study in which 45 patients (39M, 6F) were treated at different hospitals and countries between August 2020 to October 2021 with a mean follow up of year (1month, 3months, 6months and 12months). All patients were followed using radiographs, physical examination, ASA and VAS score.Results: All patients with radius fracture treated with specific fixation of plate system were enrolled and received continuous physiotherapy by physiotherapists, which helped in early healing. The clinical treatment results showed decline in the VAS score percentage after 1 year follow up. About 91.1% patients were satisfied with no pain and 8.8% patients were unsatisfied due to mild pain. A successful surgical outcome was reported without any complications related to implant breakage, loosening, corrosion or other factors.Conclusions: The radius plate system results in more efficient, stable fixation and better subjective results early in the postoperative period. It has minimal complications requiring reoperation and risks

    High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) for primary or recurrent cancer in the vagina

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HDR brachytherapy for primary or recurrent vaginal cancer. METHODS: Between the years 2000 to 2006, 18 patients with primary or recurrent vaginal cancer were treated with brachytherapy (HDRB). Six patients had primary vaginal cancer (stage II to IVA) while 12 were treated for isolated vaginal recurrence (primary cervix = 4, vulva = 1 and endometrium = 7). Five patients had previous pelvic radiation therapy. All except one patient received external beam radiation therapy to a median dose of 45 Gy (range 31.2–55.8 Gy). The HDRB was intracavitary using a vaginal cylinder in 5 patients and interstitial using a modified Syed-Nesblett template in 13 patients. The dose of interstitial brachytherapy was 18.75 Gy in 5 fractions delivered twice daily. The median follow-up was 18 months (range 6–66 months). RESULTS: Complete response (CR) was achieved in all but one patient (94%). Of these 17 patients achieving a CR, 1 had local recurrence and 3 had systemic recurrence at a median time of 6 months (range 6–22 months). The 2-year actuarial local control and cause-specific survival for the entire group were 88% and 82.5%, respectively. In subset analysis, the crude local control was 100% for primary vaginal cancer, 100% for the group with recurrence without any prior radiation and 67% for group with recurrence and prior radiation therapy. Two patients had late grade 3 or higher morbidity (rectovaginal fistula in one patient and chronic vaginal ulcer resulting in bleeding in one patient). Both these patients had prior radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Our small series suggests that HDRB is efficacious for primary or recurrent vaginal cancer. Patients treated with primary disease and those with recurrent disease without prior irradiation have the greatest benefit from HDRB in this setting. The salvage rate for patients with prior radiation therapy is lower with a higher risk of significant complications. Additional patients and follow-up are ongoing to determine the long-term efficacy of this approach

    Is there an advantage to delivering breast boost in the lateral decubitus position?

    Get PDF
    Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the change in depth of target volume and dosimetric parameters between the supine and lateral decubitus positions for breast boost treatment with electron beam therapy.Methods: We analyzed 45 patients who were treated, between 2009-2010, with whole breast radiation (WBRT) followed by a tumor bed boost in the lateral decubitius position. Tumor bed volume, distance from skin to the maximal depth of the tumor bed, D90 (dose covering 90% of the tumor bed volume), maximal dose, electron energy and doses to heart and lungs were compared. Additional variables of body mass index (BMI) and tumor bed location were also analyzed to see if there was a benefit limited to any subgroup.Results: Median BMI for the 45 patients treated was 30.6 (20.6-42.4). When comparing the supine scan to the lateral decubitus scan, there was no significant difference in the tumor bed volume (p = 0.116). There was a significant difference between depth to the tumor bed in the supine scan and lateral decubitus scan (p < 0.001). The mean maximum doses and D90 between the two scans were 110.7 (100.0-133.0)% vs 106.1 (95.1-116.9)% (p < 0.05) and 93.9 (81.3-01.0-101.0)% vs. 98.2 (89.1-108.0)% (p = 0.004) respectively. There was no difference in dose delivered to the lungs or heart between the two scans (p = 0.848 and p = 0.992 respectively). On subset analysis, there was a difference in depth to tumor that was seen across all BMI classes, including normal (p ≤ 0.001, overweight (p ≤ 0.001) and obese (p ≤ 0.001). The majority of patients had a tumor in the upper outer quadrant (77.8%) and on subset analysis, there was a significant difference in tumor bed volume (p < 0.01), depth to tumor (p < 0.01), tumor bed coverage [D90] (p < 0.05), maximum dose (p < 0.05) and energy (p < 0.001) for this location.Conclusions: Delivering a tumor bed boost in the lateral decubitus position reduces the distance to the tumor bed allowing for a lower energy treatment to be used to treat breast cancer. It improves coverage and decreases maximal dose to the target volume, all of which would help reduce skin morbidities and should be considered for patients with upper outer quadrant disease, irrespective of BMI status. © 2012 Kannan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

    RapidPlan Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Model Version 2-How far can we reduce the dose?

    Get PDF
    Whole-brain radiotherapy has been the standard palliative treatment for patients with brain metastases due to its effectiveness, availability, and ease of administration. Recent clinical trials have shown that limiting radiation dose to the hippocampus is associated with decreased cognitive toxicity. In this study, we updated an existing Knowledge Based Planning model to further reduce dose to the hippocampus and improve other dosimetric plan quality characteristics. Forty-two clinical cases were contoured according to guidelines. A new dosimetric scorecard was created as an objective measure for plan quality. The new Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Version 2 (HSWBv2) model adopted a complex recursive training process and was validated with five additional cases. HSWBv2 treatment plans were generated on the Varian Halcyo

    An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary

    Get PDF
    PurposeTo summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)'s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective.Methods and materialsThe RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate.ResultsThe ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA.ConclusionsThis analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site

    #radonc: Growth of the Global Radiation Oncology Twitter Network

    Get PDF
    Introduction Social media connects people globally and may enhance access to radiation oncology information. We characterized the global growth of the radiation oncology Twitter community using the hashtag #radonc. Materials and Methods We analyzed all public tweets bearing the hashtag #radonc from 2014-2019 using Symplur Signals. We collected data on #radonc activity and growth, stakeholder distribution, user geolocation, and languages. We obtained global Twitter user data and calculated average annual growth rates for users and tweets. We analyzed growth rates by stakeholder. We conducted thematic analysis on a sample of tweets in each three-year period using frequently occurring two-word combinations. Results We identified 193,115 tweets including #radonc composed by 16,645 Twitter users. Globally, users wrote in 35 languages and came from 122 countries, with the known highest users from the United States, United Kingdom, and Spain. Use of #radonc expanded from 23 countries in 2014 to 116 in 2019. The average annual growth rate in #radonc users and tweets was 70.5% and 69.2%, respectively. The annual growth rate of #radonc users was significantly higher than for all Twitter users (p=0.004). While doctors were the source of 46.9% of all tweets, research and government organizations had annual increases in tweet volume of 84.6% and 211.4%, respectively. From 2014 to 2016, promotion of the radiation oncology community was the most active theme, though this dropped to 7th in 2017-2019 as discussion increased regarding aspects of radiation and treated disease sites. Conclusion Use of #radonc has grown rapidly into a global community. Focused discussion related to radiation oncology has outpaced the growth of general Twitter use, both among physicians and non-physicians. #radonc has grown into a self-sustaining community. Further research is necessary to define the risks and benefits of social media in medicine and to determine whether it adds value to oncology practice

    Racial Disparities in Patients with Stage IIIC Endometrial Cancer

    Get PDF
    Purpose/Objective(s): To report the impact of race on clinical outcomes in patients with stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma (EC). Materials/Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study was conducted across 13 Northern American academic centers and included patients with stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma (EC) who received both chemotherapy and radiation in an adjuvant setting. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed by Cox proportional hazard models for RFS/OS. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of race on survival outcomes. Statistical analyses were conducted using statistical software. Results: A total of 90 Black and 568 non-Black patients (83%) were identified with a median age at diagnosis of 62 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 55-70). Median follow-up was 45.3 months (IQR 24-71 months). Black patients were significantly older (p\u3c0.0001), had significantly more non-endometrioid histology (p\u3c0.0001), grade 3 tumors (p\u3c0.0001) and were more likely to have \u3e1 positive paraaortic lymph nodes (PALN) compared to non-black patients. The presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), depth of myometrial involvement, number of total nodes involved, adnexal and cervical involvement and stage were not correlated with race (all p\u3e0.1). As for treatment type, chemoradiotherapy sequencing approach was not correlated with race and no difference in number of chemotherapy cycles between Black and non-Black patients (p=0.32) was observed. Black patients were more often treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (43.3% and 24%, respectively) while a higher proportion of non-black patients received both EBRT and vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) (65% vs. 38 %) (P\u3c0.0001) despite similar cervical involvement. The 5-year estimated OS and RFS rates were 45% and 47% compared to 77% and 68% for Black patients vs. non-black patients, respectively (p\u3c0.001). After propensity score matching, the 2 groups were well balanced for most of the covariates (age, histology, stage, grade, number of positive PALN, adnexal and cervical involvement) except for depth of myometrial invasion and radiation type. The estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of Black vs. non-Black patients were 1.613 (95% CI = (1.01, 2.575), p-value = 0.045) for OS and 1.487 (95% CI = (0.906, 2.440), p-value = 0.116) for RFS, indicating that Black patients have significantly worse OS. RFS differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Compared to non-Black patients, Black patients have higher rates of non-endometrioid histology, grade 3 tumors and number of PALNs. After propensity score matching, Black patients had worse OS but no statistically significant difference in RFS. Racial disparities could be mitigated by better access to care, equitable inclusion on randomized trials, and identification of genomic/molecular differences to better tailor adjuvant treatment
    corecore