Editorial: Social work and social media: best friends or natural enemies?

No description supplie

Mark my words! Service User and Carer Involvement in Social Work Academic Assessment

This paper discusses the involvement of service users in academic assessment as part of a second year module for social work undergraduate students at Canterbury Christ Church University in the UK. The three main tasks undertaken in partnership are detailed: designing an assessment form, assessment of student group presentations and assessment of a written reflective essay. The paper starts by identifying key questions raised by the assessor team before providing a critical commentary on the process, and identifying challenges and learning points. The experience emphasises the need for a more critical and searching approach towards service user involvement in social work education in academic assessment. Moreover, the team's experience suggests that such work is best achieved in the context of collaborative working relationships based on trust, with opportunities for team reflection and supported by training in academic assessment

What is the process by which a decision to administer Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) or not is made?:A grounded theory informed study of the multi-disciplinary professionals involved

Purpose: To develop a grounded theory informed model explaining the decision-making process professionals in multi-disciplinary teams go through in deciding whether to administer Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or not. Methods: A grounded theory informed methodology was used to analyse the data offered by ten participants who had all been involved in the process of deciding if someone has ECT or not. Results: The core categories, described as ‘layers’ in this research, ‘personal and professional identity’; ‘subjective vs objective’; ‘Guidelines or Clinical Instinct?’; ‘Someone has to take Responsibility’ and ‘the decision in action’ were constructed from the data. Conclusions: The study describes a useful insight into the layers of the decision-making process that could be further considered in clinical settings. The model highlights the decision to give ECT includes many different layers including professional identity, how a person understands the evidence base, past experiences, and the amount of power they have in the process. The consultant psychiatrist and the patient were seen as holding most power in the process depending on whether the Mental Capacity Act (2005) or Mental Health Act (2007) was being followed. Patients were seen to experience a very different decision-making process dependant on the personal views of the professionals in relation to ECT