Engaging Hard-to-Reach Audiences through Internal Interdisciplinary and External Diverse Collaborations

Through a combination of internal and external collaborations, consumer-based energy education designed for hard-to-reach audiences was successfully delivered statewide by an interdisciplinary Extension team. Program participants representing rural residents, senior citizens, and low-income audiences demonstrated improvements in knowledge and increased intention to change their home electricity usage behaviors. This outreach work can serve as a model for other Extension services to combine interdisciplinary teams with community partnerships to reach underserved audiences statewide

Characteristics of Adults in the Hepatitis B Research Network in North America Reflect Their Country of Origin and Hepatitis B Virus Genotype

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide; populations that migrate to the US and Canada might be disproportionately affected. The Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN) is a cooperative network of investigators from the United States and Canada, created to facilitate clinical, therapeutic, and translational research in adults and children with hepatitis B. We describe the structure of the network and baseline characteristics of adults with hepatitis B enrolled in the network

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies

Recent research builds on the observation that democracies have more durable alliances to argue that democracies make more reliable allies. This need not be the case. Alliances serve as commitment devices, adding ex ante credibility to states' claims about ex post behavior. Variation in alliance durability must reflect differences in the desirability of formalizing alignments. Put simply, democracies are "most improved" by formal commitments. We offer two related explanations for why democracies might actually be less reliable alliance partners. Information costs for participating in policymaking and the advantages of organized interest groups combined with distributional incentives generated by the periodic turnover of governments may conspire to make informal commitments on the part of democracies problematic. Determining the net effect of democratic virtue and vice is best done empirically. We test alliance reliability by focusing on intervention, rather than on the duration or the number of commitments. Our results suggest that democracies make less reliable allies

Global introductions of crayfishes: Evaluating the impact of species invasions on ecosystem services

10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-111511-103919Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics43449-47

Gattini: A multisite campaign for the measurement of sky brightness in Antarctica

10 page(s

miR-4516 predicts poor prognosis and functions as a novel oncogene via targeting PTPN14 in human glioblastoma.

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most aggressive primary brain tumors, with an average survival of less than 15 months. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for GBM. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of miR-4516 and investigate its oncogenic functions and the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms in GBM. To determine the correlation between miR-4516 expression and overall survival of patients with GBM, total RNAs were isolated from 268 FFPE tumor samples, miR expression was assayed (simultaneously) using the nCounter human miRNA v3a assay followed by univariable and multivariable survival analyses. Further, in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to define the role of miR-4516 in GBM tumorigenesis and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Upon multivariable analysis, miR-4516 was correlated with poor prognosis in GBM patients (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.12-1.99, P = 0.01). Interestingly, the significance of miR-4516 was retained including MGMT methylation status. Overexpression of miR-4516 significantly enhanced cell proliferation and invasion of GBM cells both in vitro and in vivo. While conducting downstream targeting studies, we found that the tumor-promoting function of miR-4516, in part, was mediated by direct targeting of PTPN14 (protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 14) which, in turn, regulated the Hippo pathway in GBM. Taken together, our data suggest that miR-4516 represents an independent negative prognostic factor in GBM patients and acts as a novel oncogene in GBM, which regulates the PTPN14/Hippo pathway. Thus, this newly identified miR-4516 may serve as a new potential therapeutic target for GBM treatment