Un meta-análisis sobre el crecimiento de las paralarvas de pulpo común (Octopus vulgaris) alimentadas con diferentes presas vivas

El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar el efecto de la alimentación con diferentes presas vivas (Artemia y zoeas de crustáceos) y/o Artemia enriquecida, sobre el crecimiento de paralarvas de pulpo común (Octopus vulgaris) a través de un meta-análisis. Se usaron un total de 26 ensayos independientes para analizar las diferencias en crecimiento entre: (i) zoeas de crustáceos vs Artemia, (ii) diferentes especies de crustáceos y (iii) Artemia enriquecida con fosfolípidos marinos vs otros enriquecedores de Artemia. Se observó un mejor crecimiento de las paralarvas alimentadas con zoeas de crustáceos vs Artemia. Sin embargo, no todas las zoeas mostraron los mismos resultados, dada la alta variabilidad observada con el género Grapsus que impidió que se pudieran apreciar diferencias respecto a la Artemia usada como control. Finalmente, el enriquecimiento de Artemia con fosfolípidos marinos mejoró el crecimiento de las paralarvas, lo cual podría estar relacionado con el incremento en los niveles del ácido docosahexaenoico ((DHA, 22:6n-3) y de los lípidos polares en Artemia

Natural variation of toxicity in encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Schmidt) in relation to size and environment

The presence of intraspecific variation in toxicity and its relationship with biological or ecological factors were studied in the spongeCrambe crambe. Within-specimen (periphery and central part), between-size (10,000 mm2) and between-habitat (well-illuminated and dark communities) variations in toxicity were evaluated by the Microtox bioassay. Quantitative differences were detected that were not attributable to within-specimen variation but to size and habitat effects. Habitat comparisons showed that sponges in the shaded habitat were significantly more toxic than those of the well-illuminated community. Sponges of the smaller size classes displayed significantly less toxicity than the medium-sized specimens. Results are interpreted under the optimal defense theory and their ecological implications are considered.Peer reviewe

The potential of trait-based approaches to contribute to marine conservation

The value of diversity metrics to represent ecological communities and inform broad-scale conservation objectives and policy has often been subject to debate and uncertainty [1] and [2]. In practice, diversity metrics are important in setting management and conservation priorities, just as economic indices contribute to global monetary and financial policies. Thus, key challenges for ecologists are to identify new ways to view and summarise patterns in biodiversity and improve on the metrics available for management purposes. In a recent paper on functional diversity patterns in reef fishes [3], we highlighted the potential of new insights gained from functional trait-based approaches to inform marine management, stressing the need to develop and refine biodiversity measures that are linked to ecology (rather than taxonomy). We used a unique, fisheries-independent reef fish identity and abundance dataset, collected using standardised methods from equatorial to high latitude regions all over the world, to provide the first global view of the distribution of individuals amongst species (including a measure of evenness) and functional traits amongst marine communities. A recent paper by Robinson et al. [4] published in Marine Policy criticised the use of our evenness index as a measure of biodiversity, and questioned the use of functional trait-based metrics derived from surveys of standardised areas for decisions relating to broad-scale management of marine systems. In this paper we respond to Robinson et al. and rebut their claims related to sampling bias and broad-scale applicability of trait-based approaches