Effect of self-administered intraperitoneal bemiparin on peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration capacity in peritoneal dialysis patients with membrane dysfunction: a randomized, multi-centre open clinical trial

Randomized controlled trial[Abstract] Background: Progressive peritoneal membrane injury and dysfunction are feared repercussions of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and may compromise the long-term feasibility of this therapy. Different strategies have been attempted to prevent or reverse this complication with limited success. Methods: We performed a randomized, open multi-centre trial, aimed at scrutinizing the efficacy of self-administered intraperitoneal (i.p.) bemiparin (BM) to modulate peritoneal membrane dysfunction. The main outcome variables were peritoneal creatinine transport and the ultrafiltration (UF) capacity, estimated during consecutive peritoneal equilibration tests. The trial included a control group who did not undergo intervention. The treatment phase lasted 16 weeks with a post-study follow-up of 8 weeks. Results: Intraperitoneal BM did not significantly improve creatinine transport or the UF capacity, when the whole group was considered. However, we observed a time-limited improvement in the UF capacity for the subgroup of patients with overt UF failure, which was not observed in the control group. Intraperitoneal injection of BM did not carry an increased risk of peritoneal infection or major haemorrhagic complications. Conclusions: Our data do not support the systematic use of BM for management of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in PD patients. Further studies on the usefulness of this approach in patients with overt UF failure are warranted. Intraperitoneal administration of BM is safe in PD patients, provided regulated procedures are respected

Low serum levels of vitamin D are associated with progression of subclinical atherosclerotic vascular disease in peritoneal dialysis patients: a prospective, multicenter study

[Abstract] Background: The prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and the main predictors of progression of this condition in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) have been insufficiently investigated. Objectives and Method: Following a prospective, multicenter, observational design, we studied 237 patients who were treated with PD for ≥3 months, without any clinical background of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Our objectives were the following: (1) to investigate the prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis, as compared to a control group of age- and sex-matched healthy individuals, and (2) to disclose PD technique-related predictors of progression of disease during a 24-month follow-up period. We used vascular ultrasound for characterization of subclinical atherosclerotic disease. Main Results: A total of 123 patients (51.9%) vs. 79 controls (33.5%) presented ≥1 carotid plaque, and 114 patients (48.3%) vs. 72 controls (30.5%) ≥1 femoral plaque, at baseline evaluation (p < 0.0005). Progression of disease, either in clinical or ultrasound (new plaques) terms, affected 62.6% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified age, carotid intima-media thickness, presence of ≥1 carotid plaque, and serum levels of 25OH vitamin D and C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline as independent correlates of progression of atherosclerotic disease. On the contrary, PD technique-related variables did not show any association with this outcome. Conclusions: Atherosclerotic vascular disease is frequent among asymptomatic patients undergoing PD. Older age, pre-existent disease (assessed by vascular ultrasound), and serum levels of 25OH vitamin D and CRP are independent markers of the progression of this condition. These findings may contribute to improve identification of subpopulations with a high risk of CV events, deserving intensified measures of prevention

Clinical guide of the Spanish Society of Nephrology on the prevention and treatment of peritoneal infection in peritoneal dialysis

[Resumen] Las infecciones peritoneales siguen constituyendo una complicación muy relevante de la diálisis peritoneal, por su incidencia todavía elevada y por sus importantes consecuencias clínicas, en términos de mortalidad, fracaso de la técnica y costes para el sistema sanitario. Las prácticas de prevención y tratamiento de esta complicación muestran una notable heterogeneidad derivada, entre otros factores, de la complejidad del problema y de la escasez de evidencia clínica que permitan responder de manera clara a muchas de las dudas planteadas. El propósito de este documento es proporcionar una revisión completa y actualizada de los métodos de diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento de estas infecciones. El documento se ha elaborado tomando como referencia de partida la guía más reciente de la Sociedad Internacional de Diálisis Peritoneal (2016). Mientras que para el capítulo diagnóstico se ha adoptado una estructura más narrativa, el análisis de las medidas de prevención y tratamiento ha seguido una metodología sistemática (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]), que especifica el nivel de evidencia y la fuerza de las sugerencias y recomendaciones propuestas, y facilita actualizaciones futuras de la guía. La gran extensión y numerosas recomendaciones o sugerencias emanadas de la revisión ponen de manifiesto la complejidad y gran número de facetas a tener en cuenta para un adecuado abordaje de esta importante complicación de la diálisis peritoneal.[Abstract] Peritoneal infections still represent a most feared complication of chronic peritoneal dialysis, due to their high incidence and relevant clinical consequences, including direct mortality, technique failure and a significant burden for the health system. The practices for prevention and treatment of this complication show a remarkable heterogeneity emerging, among other factors, from the complexity of the problem and from a paucity of quality evidence which could permit to respond clearly to many of the raised questions. The purpose of this document is to provide a complete and updated review of the main methods of diagnosis, prevention and treatment of these infections. The document has been elaborated taking as a reference the most recent guidelines of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (2016). The diagnostic considerations are presented in a narrative style while, for prevention and therapy, we have used a systematic methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]), which specifies the level of evidence and the strength of the proposed suggestions and recommendations and facilitates future updates of the document. The length of the document and the many suggestions and recommendations coming out of the review underline the large number and the complexity of the factors to be taken into consideration for an adequate approach to this complication of peritoneal dialysis

Métodos para medir adecuación en diálisis peritoneal continua ambulatoria: utilidad del modelo cinético de la uréa y la creatinina

Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina, 12-2-199

Consulta de enfermería interdisciplinar de enfermedad renal crónica avanzada: apuntes para un modelo integral de cuidados: carta al Director

La consulta de enfermería de Enfermedad Renal Cróni-ca Avanzada (ERCA) constituye un escenario especialmente complejo(1,2) tanto para el paciente como para los profesionales. Por este motivo, y con el objetivo principal de ofrecer apoyo al personal de enfermería durante estas consultas, en la Unidad de ERCA del Servicio de Nefrología del Hospital Universitario La Paz, se en-cuentra dentro del protocolo de actuación la posibilidad de que el psicólogo este físicamente presente en esta consulta. Esta modalidad de actuación está en línea con la evidencia de que un equipo interdisciplinar es necesario para mejorar la comprensión de la enfermedad renal, y con ello la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) de los pacientes con ERCA(3). Este protocolo ha sido publicado como carta al director en la revista Nefrología(4), aunque en la presente versión hacemos énfasis en aspectos diferenciales, principalmente en las funciones específi cas de la enfermería en la consulta de ERCA y la defi nición del perfi l de paciente ante el cual activar este protocolo. El objetivo de promover la difusión del mismo en las distintas sociedades científicas de la especialidad es recordarnos que en el abordaje integral del enfermo renal es mucho más lo que nos une que lo que nos separa