5 research outputs found
La conversion des peuples dits « non-civilisés » chez Raoul Allier (1862-1939)
Câest Ă travers lâĆuvre de Raoul Allier, intellectuel protestant du dĂ©but du XXĂšme siĂšcle, trĂšs engagĂ© dans les dĂ©bats de son temps, que le processus de conversion des peuples « indigĂšnes » est apprĂ©hendĂ©. Sâappuyant sur les Ă©crits des missionnaires et des entretiens avec ceux-ci, Raoul Allier a dĂ©veloppĂ© une approche psycho-anthropologique de la conversion. Raoul Allier se situant dans une perspective humaniste, la conversion occupe, dĂšs lors, une place centrale. Le fait que certains indigĂšnes se convertissent profondĂ©ment est, aux yeux de Raoul Allier, la preuve de lâunicitĂ© de lâespĂšce humaine
La carriÚre du plaidoyer au sein de Jubilé USA : controverses et (re) définition des « bonnes pratiques » militantes
Expériences de conversion
ConsacrĂ© Ă des expĂ©riences de conversions, ce numĂ©ro des Cahiers donne Ă voir le vĂ©cu de la conversion et ses liens avec le contexte. Ă Â travers lâĂ©tude de Raymond Mentzer, nous dĂ©couvrons lâinfluence exercĂ©e par le « milieu » sur le processus de conversion, au XVII Ăšme siĂšcle.  Ce texte met en lumiĂšre les facteurs qui ont pu jouer un rĂŽle, parfois non nĂ©gligeable,  sur la conversion,  et les stratĂ©gies auxquelles elle obĂ©issait. Didier Boisson sâintĂ©resse Ă lâaccueil, qui Ă©tait rĂ©servĂ© aux catholiques, membres du ClergĂ©, convertis au protestantisme, par les Ătats protestants et les communautĂ©s françaises du Refuge. Câest la mĂ©fiance qui prĂ©domine, face Ă ces conversions dont on mettait en doute la sincĂ©ritĂ©. Enfin, le dernier texte, Ă©crit par HĂ©lĂšne Baillot, est consacrĂ© Ă la conversion des peuples dits « non-civilisĂ©s », telle quâelle est analysĂ©e, interprĂ©tĂ©e, dans une vision psycho-anthropologique, par un intellectuel protestant, thĂ©ologien, Raoul Allier (1862-1939) à partir des Ă©crits missionnaires
Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
Background:
General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care.
Methods:
For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered.
Findings:
Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09â2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75â3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14â2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low.
Interpretation:
Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons