Routine measurement of radioisotope left ventricular ejection fraction prior to vascular surgery: Is it worthwhile?

Objective. To determine whether estimation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by means of multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning could reliably stratify cardiac risk prior to elective major vascular surgery. Methods. A review of the English-language literature. Results and Conclusions. Twenty-two studies enrolling a total of 3096 patients were identified from 1984 to date. Selection bias, blinding of the results, different cut-off limits, and several retrospective studies were some of the problems preventing a comprehensive analysis. The resting LVEF was not found to be a consistent predictor of perioperative ischaemic cardiac events. In the perioperative phase, poor LV function was, mainly, predictive of congestive heart failure, and, in the long-term, of cardiac outcome. The presence of myocardial wall motion abnormalities was also associated with both a higher chance of postoperative cardiac complications and a worse long-term cardiac outcome. Although measurements of LV function seem to play a key role in defining a patient's long-term prognosis, the value of routinely measuring LVEF preoperatively is limited and, therefore, MUGA scanning cannot be recommended as a general screening test. Despite this, it has been widely used for cardiac risk assessment in vascular surgery, and only recently its popularity has started declining. Other tests, such as stress-echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging, used selectively in moderate-risk patients can refine prediction of cardiac risk. In the future, gated stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, perhaps combined with ANP/BNP plasma level determination, may become a first choice test in preoperative cardiac risk assessment

Management of superficial and deep surgical site infection: an international multidisciplinary consensus

Surgical site infections represent a considerable burden for healthcare systems. To obtain a consensus on the impact and future clinical and economic needs regarding SSI management in an era of multidrug resistance. A modified Delphi method was used to obtain consensus among experts from five European countries. The Delphi questionnaire was assembled by a steering committee, verified by a panel of experts and administered to 90 experts in 8 different surgical specialities (Abdominal, Cancer, Cardiac, General surgery, Orthopaedic, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular and three other specialities (infectious disease, internal medicine microbiology). Respondents (n = 52) reached consensus on 62/73 items including that resistant pathogens are an increasing matter of concern and increase both treatment complexity and the length of hospital stay. There was strong positive consensus on the cost-effectiveness of early discharge (ED) programs, improvement of quality of life with ED and association between increased length of stay and economic burden to the hospital. However, established ED protocols were not widely available in their hospitals. Respondents expressed a positive consensus on the usefulness of antibiotics that allow ED. Surgeons are aware of their responsibility in an interdisciplinary team for the treatment of SSI, and of the impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the context of SSI. Reducing the length of hospital stays by applying ED protocols and implementing new treatment alternatives is crucial to reduce harm to patients and costs for the hospital. © 2021, The Author(s)

Management of superficial and deep surgical site infection: an international multidisciplinary consensus

Surgical site infections represent a considerable burden for healthcare systems. To obtain a consensus on the impact and future clinical and economic needs regarding SSI management in an era of multidrug resistance. A modified Delphi method was used to obtain consensus among experts from five European countries. The Delphi questionnaire was assembled by a steering committee, verified by a panel of experts and administered to 90 experts in 8 different surgical specialities (Abdominal, Cancer, Cardiac, General surgery, Orthopaedic, Thoracic, Transplant and Vascular and three other specialities (infectious disease, internal medicine microbiology). Respondents (n = 52) reached consensus on 62/73 items including that resistant pathogens are an increasing matter of concern and increase both treatment complexity and the length of hospital stay. There was strong positive consensus on the cost-effectiveness of early discharge (ED) programs, improvement of quality of life with ED and association between increased length of stay and economic burden to the hospital. However, established ED protocols were not widely available in their hospitals. Respondents expressed a positive consensus on the usefulness of antibiotics that allow ED. Surgeons are aware of their responsibility in an interdisciplinary team for the treatment of SSI, and of the impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the context of SSI. Reducing the length of hospital stays by applying ED protocols and implementing new treatment alternatives is crucial to reduce harm to patients and costs for the hospital

The Use of a Fine-Gauge Needle to Reduce Pain in Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study on 86 patients compared the level of pain experienced by patients on instillation of local anaesthetic into the palm with a 23-gauge and a 27-gauge (dental) needle in open carpal tunnel decompression. Patients were asked to score the amount of pain they experienced during the injection of the local anaesthetic and their level of anxiety about future injections using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a four-point verbal response scale (VRS). The mean pain and anxiety scores on the VAS were significantly lower in the dental needle group. There was significant correlation between the pain and anxiety VAS scores. When infiltrating local anaesthetic into the palm for open carpal tunnel decompression, the use of a fine (dental) needle can reduce the pain on that occasion and the anxiety concerning future injections likely to be experienced by the patient.</p