Risk factors of hepatic function alterations in hospitalized adult patients treated with short-term parenteral nutrition receiving the same lipid composition at the same dose

Background: High doses and vegetable origin of lipid emulsions (LE) are prominent factors for liver test (LT) alterations in patients treated with parenteral nutrition (PN). This study aims to determine incidence of LT alterations, and risk factors related to these alterations in patients with short term PN with homogenous LE. Methods: Adult non-critically ill hospitalized patients, with normal LTs at the beginning of PN, receiving 0.8 g/kg/day of an olive/soybean LE were included. A paired Student t-test was applied to compare final with initial LT values. LT variation (end vs start of PN) according to type of surgery and infection was studied by means of an analysis of the variance. Univariate and multivariate analyses were constructed to relate the variations of each of the 4 LTs with the adjustment variables. Results: One hundred eighty one patients (66.57 ± 12.89 years; 72.4% men), 66.8% suffered from cancer. Final LT values increased from initial values for gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) 2.69 ± 2.49 μkat/L vs 0.55 ± 0.36 μkat/L, alkaline phosphatase (AP) 1.97 ± 1.49 μkat/L vs 1.04 ± 0.33 μkat/L, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 0.57 ± 0. 92 μkat/L vs 0.32 ± 0.26 μkat/L. GGT and AP variations were associated with days of PN; GGT, AP and total bilirubin with surgical patients, AP variations with infection, and GGT with cancer. Multivariate analysis: elevation of GGT, AP and ALT was related to infection, days of PN and surgery. Conclusions: Factors that increased the risk of LTs elevation during short term PN treatment were duration of PN, surgery, cancer, and infection associated with oxidative stress

The relationship between the parenteral dose of fish oil supplementation and the variation of liver function tests in hospitalized adult patients

Background Hepatic dysfunction is a complication associated with parenteral nutrition (PN). Our primary objective was to study the relationship between doses of intravenous fish oil (FO) emulsion in PN and the variation in the main liver function tests (LFTs) in hospitalized PN-treated adults. As a secondary objective, we studied the safety of FO administration. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in adult patients receiving FO supplementation in PN. Demographic, nutritional and safety variables were collected. Variation of LFTs was defined as the difference between values just before the first administration of FO and values at the end of PN. A multiple linear regression was performed to study the association between PN-lipids (FO or vegetable) and the variation of each LFT; the following variables were used to adjust the effect of lipids: sepsis, length of stay in the intensive care unit and lipids dose. Student t-test was used to study safety variables. Data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0. Results Patients (53, median age 68 years (24-90); 62 % men) with the principal diagnosis of digestive neoplasm (42 %) received PN for a median of 19 (7-75) days. In the multivariate analysis, the amount of FO was related to a decrease in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (B = −2.23;CI95 % = −4.41/-0.05), a decrease in alkaline phosphatase (AP) (B = −1.23;CI95 % = −2.07/-0.37), and a decrease in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (B = −0.82; CI95 % = −1.19/-0.44). No differences were found in safety variables. Conclusions GGT, AP and ALT improved with FO PN-supplementation. Moreover, the improvement was greater when the doses of FO were higher. FO administration in PN is safe

Phytosterol determination in lipid emulsions for parenteral nutrition

Objective: The presence of phytosterols in vegetal lipid emulsions has been associated with alterations of liver function tests. Determination of phytosterols content, currently undeclared, would allow the development of strategies to prevent or treat these alterations. Method: 3-4 non-consecutive batches of 6 lipid emulsions from diffe rent providers (Clinoleic , Intralipid , Lipofundina , Lipoplus , Omegaven and Smoflipid ) were analyzed. Differences in total phytosterol assay between providers and batches were statistically studied by a one way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric approximation and post hoc Scheffé test (p<0.05) Results: The absence of phytosterols was confirmed in Omegaven , emulsion based on fish oil. The highest assay of phytosterols (422.4±130.5 µg/mL) has been related with the highest percentage of soya bean oil in Intralipid. In the remaining emulsions, concentrations were from 120 to 210 µg/mL related to the percentage of soya bean oil. Statistically significant differences of phytosterol content in lipid emulsions were observed among different providers (F=23.59; p=0.000) as well as among non-consecutive batches. Clinolenic (F=23.59; p=0.000), Intralipid (F=978.25; p=0.000), Lipofundina TCL/TCM (F=5.43; p=0.045), Lipoplus (F=123.53; p=0.000) and Smoflipid (16.78; p=0.000). Except for Lipofundina TCL/TCM, the differences between batches were marked. Conclusions: Lipid emulsions, registered on Spanish pharmaceutical market, contain variable quantities of phytosterols dependent on commer cial brand and batch

A randomised study on the clinical progress of high-risk elective major gastrointestinal surgery patients treated with olive oil-based parenteral nutrition with or without a fish oil supplement

n-3 Fatty acids have clinical benefits. The primary aim of the present study was the assessment of infection in patients who underwent major high-risk elective gastrointestinal surgery receiving postoperatively fish oil (FO)-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN), compared with those receiving a standard olive oil (OO) emulsion. The secondary aims were the assessment of anti-inflammatory response and evaluation of tolerance and safety of these emulsions. A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was performed in patients requiring at least 5 d of PN. An isoenergetic and isoproteic formula was administered: group A received OO alone, while group B received OO that was partially replaced with FO (16.6 %, w/w). End points were outcome measures (mortality, sepsis, infection, hospitalisation days and PN duration), inflammatory response (C-reactive protein (CRP), prealbumin and leucocytes) and safety (TAG and glucose metabolism, and liver and kidney function). Statistical analysis was done using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Twenty-seven patients were evaluated, with thirteen patients receiving FO. In this group, a significantly lower incidence of infections was found (23.1 v. 78.6 %, P = 0.007). CRP, prealbumin and leucocytes were not significantly different between the groups. There were no differences in safety parameters. We conclude that high-risk surgical patients receiving FO-supplemented PN for 5 d present a lower incidence of infection. Emulsions were safe and well tolerated

Selección de emulsiones lipídicas en nutrición parenteral: parámetros bioquímicos y hematológicos

Introducción: el patrón de ácidos grasos (AG) de las emulsiones lipídicas (EL) utilizadas en nutrición parenteral (NP) condiciona diferentes respuestas fisiológicas. Objetivos: estudiar si los criterios clínicos de prescripción de EL en NP establecidos en nuestro protocolo abierto y basados en recomendaciones se correlacionan con marcadores bioquímicos y hematológicos iniciales. Métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo de cuatro años. Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas, nutricionales y analíticas al inicio de la NP. Se realizó un análisis uni y multivariante para estudiar la asociación entre los valores iniciales de los parámetros bioquímicos y hematológicos (PBHE) y el tipo de emulsión lipídica empleada. Resultados: de los 1.558 pacientes, 460 pacientes (29,5%) tenían PBHE al inicio de la NP y utilizaron mayoritariamente las combinaciones soja (AS) + triglicéridos de cadena media (MCT) + oliva (AO) + pescado (AP) (37,4%) y AS+MCT+AO (35,6%). Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente signifiativas en el patrón EL utilizado entre los pacientes con y sin PBHE: patrón de AG con AP 44,8% vs.39,5%, respectivamente. Las situaciones clínicas con proteína C-reactiva (PCR) elevada se asociaron con mayor uso de EL con AP: AS+AO+AP (OR: 4,52 [IC 95%: 1,43-13,91] y AS+MCT+AO+AP (OR: 3,34 [IC 95%: 2,10-5,33]). En situaciones clínicas complejas asociadas con paciente crítico se utilizó EL con MCT: afectación hepática (AS+MCT OR: 2,42 [IC 95%: 1,03-5,68]) y afectación renal (AS+MCT+AP OR: 3,34 [IC 95%: 1,12-9,99]). Conclusiones: la inclusión protocolizada de PBHE al inicio de la NP permite complementar criterios clínicos y metabólicos en la elección de la EL

Hipofosfatemia en nutrición parenteral: prevención y factores de riesgo asociados

362 Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia de hipofosfatemia en pacientes con nutrición parenteral, la cantidad de fosfato necesaria para prevenir esta complicación y los factores de riesgo asociados. Ámbito: Estudio observacional no controlado en un hospital de nivel III. Pacientes: pacientes ingresados con nutrición parenteral a los que se les ha realizado como mínimo una analitica completa. Intervención: Se registran durante un año, los días de nutrición parenteral, el fosfato administrado y los niveles plasmáticos de calcio ionizado, .-glutamiltranspeptidasa, glucosa, fosfato, prealbúmina, urea y leucocitos. Para el análisis se aplica una regresión múltiple stepwise y una regresión logistica. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 827 determinaciones correspondientes a 401 pacientes. Las variables significativas (p < 0,05) fueron: fosfato administrado y los niveles séricos de calcio ionizado, glucosa, prealbúmina y urea; los coeficientes de regresión fueron 0,004 (95% IC: 0,002-0,006), -0,156 (95% IC: -0,270-0,037), - 0,014 (95% IC: -0,022-0,009), 0,005 (95% CI: 0,002- 0,009) y 0,019 (95% IC: 0,016-0,022) respectivamente; la constante fue 1,0735 (95% IC: 0,939-1,2079). El riesgo de desarrollar hipofosfatemia disminuyó de 0,65 (95% IC: 0,33-1,26) a 0,16 (95% IC: 0,078-0.35) cuando el fosfato administrado variaba deL rango 7,5-17,5 mmol a valores superiores a 27,5 mmol. Conclusiones: es necesario suplementar rutinariamente las nutriciones con fosfato debido a que su contenido en las emulsiones lipídicas comercializadas no es suficiente para evitar la hipofosfatemia en la mayoría de pacientes con nutrición parenteral. El aporte de fosfato debe ser suficiente para restaurar el déficit de fosfato intracelular y compensar la caída de fosfato plasmático, con especial cuidado para los pacientes desnutridos, hiperglucémicos o con insuficiencia renal. Aportes de fosfato entre 27-37 mmol, disminuyen drásticamente la incidencia de hipofosfatemia en los pacientes estudiados, no registrándose ningún caso de hipofosfatemia severa

Preparados estándar de nutrición parenteral en situaciones clínicas complejas

Objetivo: Los preparados binarios y ternarios de nu-trición parenteral, en determinados casos pueden ver su utilidad limitada. El objetivo de este estudio es establecer situaciones de difícil manejo nutricional y analizar el tipo de fór-mula utilizada en estas situaciones. Material y métodos: Se incluyen pacientes tratados con nutrición parenteral durante 9 meses. Se definen tres situaciones clínicamente complejas: larga dura-ción, con más de 25 días; insuficiencia renal, uremia > 20 mmol/L o creatinina sérica > 200 µmol/L; e insufi-ciencia hepática, bilirrubina total > 30 mmol/L o ALT > 2 µkat/L y fosfatasa alcalina > 3 µkat/L o GGT > 3 µkat/L. Se estudian la mortalidad e hipoalbuminemia (< 35 g/L) y se comparan mediante un test de Ji cua-drado (p < 0,05) al resto de los pacientes. La utilización de fórmulas individualizadas se estudia con un modelo de regresión logística múltiple, la variable dependiente es la administración o no de fórmulas individualizadas y las variables independientes son los 3 grupos de pa-cientes en situaciones clínicas definidas como comple-jas. Coo medida del riesgo se estudian las ¿Odds Ra-tio¿ (OR). Resultados: Se estudian 511 pacientes con 8.015 NP. 283 resultaron incluidos en una o más de las 3 situacio-nes clínicas complejas. Los tres grupos presentaron ni-veles de mortalidad e hipoalbuminemia superiores con diferencias estadísticamente significativas sobre el grupo de situación clínica no compleja. La utilización de fórmulas individualizadas fue superior en los tres grupos definidos resultando las diferencias estadística-mente significativas: OR = 6,7 (IC 95%; 3,78-11,91) en larga duración, OR = 3,66 (IC 95%: 2,68-5,68) en insuficiencia renal IR y OR = 1,5 (IC 95%: 1,01-2,35) en insuficiencia hepática. Conclusiones: Los pacientes en situación clínica compleja presentan mayor desnutrición visceral, peor evolución clínica y, en nuestro hospital, su tratamiento nutricional por vía parenteral se basa en una mayor utilización de fórmulas individualizadas

A randomised study on the clinical progress of high-risk elective major gastrointestinal surgery patients treated with olive oil-based parenteral nutrition with or without a fish oil supplement

n-3 Fatty acids have clinical benefits. The primary aim of the present study was the assessment of infection in patients who underwent major high-risk elective gastrointestinal surgery receiving postoperatively fish oil (FO)-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN), compared with those receiving a standard olive oil (OO) emulsion. The secondary aims were the assessment of anti-inflammatory response and evaluation of tolerance and safety of these emulsions. A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was performed in patients requiring at least 5 d of PN. An isoenergetic and isoproteic formula was administered: group A received OO alone, while group B received OO that was partially replaced with FO (16.6 %, w/w). End points were outcome measures (mortality, sepsis, infection, hospitalisation days and PN duration), inflammatory response (C-reactive protein (CRP), prealbumin and leucocytes) and safety (TAG and glucose metabolism, and liver and kidney function). Statistical analysis was done using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Twenty-seven patients were evaluated, with thirteen patients receiving FO. In this group, a significantly lower incidence of infections was found (23.1 v. 78.6 %, P = 0.007). CRP, prealbumin and leucocytes were not significantly different between the groups. There were no differences in safety parameters. We conclude that high-risk surgical patients receiving FO-supplemented PN for 5 d present a lower incidence of infection. Emulsions were safe and well tolerated

A randomised study on the clinical progress of high-risk elective major gastrointestinal surgery patients treated with olive oil-based parenteral nutrition with or without a fish oil supplement

n-3 Fatty acids have clinical benefits. The primary aim of the present study was the assessment of infection in patients who underwent major high-risk elective gastrointestinal surgery receiving postoperatively fish oil (FO)-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN), compared with those receiving a standard olive oil (OO) emulsion. The secondary aims were the assessment of anti-inflammatory response and evaluation of tolerance and safety of these emulsions. A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was performed in patients requiring at least 5 d of PN. An isoenergetic and isoproteic formula was administered: group A received OO alone, while group B received OO that was partially replaced with FO (16.6 %, w/w). End points were outcome measures (mortality, sepsis, infection, hospitalisation days and PN duration), inflammatory response (C-reactive protein (CRP), prealbumin and leucocytes) and safety (TAG and glucose metabolism, and liver and kidney function). Statistical analysis was done using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Twenty-seven patients were evaluated, with thirteen patients receiving FO. In this group, a significantly lower incidence of infections was found (23.1 v. 78.6 %, P = 0.007). CRP, prealbumin and leucocytes were not significantly different between the groups. There were no differences in safety parameters. We conclude that high-risk surgical patients receiving FO-supplemented PN for 5 d present a lower incidence of infection. Emulsions were safe and well tolerated

A randomised study on the clinical progress of high-risk elective major gastrointestinal surgery patients treated with olive oil-based parenteral nutrition with or without a fish oil supplement

n-3 Fatty acids have clinical benefits. The primary aim of the present study was the assessment of infection in patients who underwent major high-risk elective gastrointestinal surgery receiving postoperatively fish oil (FO)-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN), compared with those receiving a standard olive oil (OO) emulsion. The secondary aims were the assessment of anti-inflammatory response and evaluation of tolerance and safety of these emulsions. A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was performed in patients requiring at least 5 d of PN. An isoenergetic and isoproteic formula was administered: group A received OO alone, while group B received OO that was partially replaced with FO (16.6 %, w/w). End points were outcome measures (mortality, sepsis, infection, hospitalisation days and PN duration), inflammatory response (C-reactive protein (CRP), prealbumin and leucocytes) and safety (TAG and glucose metabolism, and liver and kidney function). Statistical analysis was done using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test (P < 0.05). Twenty-seven patients were evaluated, with thirteen patients receiving FO. In this group, a significantly lower incidence of infections was found (23.1 v. 78.6 %, P = 0.007). CRP, prealbumin and leucocytes were not significantly different between the groups. There were no differences in safety parameters. We conclude that high-risk surgical patients receiving FO-supplemented PN for 5 d present a lower incidence of infection. Emulsions were safe and well tolerated