13 research outputs found

    The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast surgery in Italy: a multi-centric retrospective observational study

    Get PDF
    COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on surgical activities. The aim of this multi-centric, retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast surgery. The patients who operated during the pre-pandemic year 2019 were compared to those operated in 2020. Fourteen Breast Care Units provided data on breast surgical procedures performed in 2020 and 2019: total number of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), number of 1st level oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), number of 2nd level OBS; total number of mastectomies, mastectomies without reconstruction, mastectomies with a tissue expander, mastectomies with direct to implant (DTI) reconstruction, mastectomies with immediate flap reconstruction; total number of delayed reconstructions, number of expanders to implant reconstructions, number of delayed flap reconstructions. Overall 20.684 patients were included: 10.850 (52.5%) operated during 2019, and 9.834 (47.5%) during 2020. The overall number of breast oncologic surgical procedures in all centers in 2020 was 8.509, compared to 9.383 in 2019 (- 9%). BCS decreased by 744 cases (- 13%), the overall number of mastectomies decreased by 130 cases (- 3.5%); mastectomy-BCS ratio was 39-61% in 2019, and 42-58% in 2020. Regarding immediate reconstructive procedures mastectomies with DTI reconstruction increased by 166 cases (+ 15%) and mastectomies with immediate expander reconstruction decreased by 297 cases (- 20%). Breast-delayed reconstructive procedures in all centers in 2020 were 142 less than in 2019 (- 10%). The outburst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 determined an implemented number of mastectomies compared to BCS, an implemented number of immediate breast reconstructions, mainly DTI, and a reduction of expander reconstruction

    Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin complexes in human breast cyst fluids

    No full text

    209P Safety of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer: A multicenter Italian study among 17 Senonetwork Breast Units

    No full text
    Background: Treatment of early stage breast cancer (BC) has evolved in its multidisciplinary approach, comprising surgery, radiotherapy and oncoplastic reconstruction. Autologous fat grafting (AFG), defined as the re-implant to the breast of fat tissue from different body areas, has been firstly applied to aesthetic plastic surgery and then used in reconstructive surgery, mainly for scar correction, nipple reconstruction and opposite breast altering to achieve a balanced appearance. Nevertheless, due to the potentially unsafe stem-like properties of adipocytes at the tumoral bed level, no clear evidence of the procedure\u2019s safety, in terms of oncological relapse, has been clearly documented so far. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of early BC patients from 17 Italian Breast Units, followed from January 1997 to March 2018, and assessed differences in terms of locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between patients who underwent AFG and patients who did not. The primary endpoint of the study was equivalence of LRR, between AFG and non-AFG groups. A LR difference within 5%, with a bilateral alpha error of 5% and 80% power was considered as equivalent. Differences were analyzed in the entire cohort of invasive tumors and in different subgroups, according to prognostic biological subtypes. Results: Among the 6703 evaluable invasive BC, 2227 (33.2%) underwent AFG procedure and 4476 (66.8%) did not. With a median follow-up time of 65 months, LRR was 5.3% in the global population, 4.4% in the AFG group and 5.7% in the non-AFG group, suggesting no difference between the two groups (p\ubc0.021, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82). No significant differences in terms of LRFS were also documented among different biological subtypes (luminal-like group, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p\ubc0.015; luminal HER2, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.83, p\ubc0.027; HER2 enriched-like, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.12-3.02, p\ubc0.544; and TNBC, HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.005-0.12, p<0.001). Conclusions: Our study consolidates previous data on AFG oncological safety, confirming, in a very large, multicenter cohort of early BC patients that, besides the wellknown benefits on the aesthetic result, AFG does not interfere negatively on cancer prognosis
    corecore