26 research outputs found

    Filipino Students’ Preferred Motivational Strategies in Science: A Cross-Sectional Survey

    Get PDF
    A multitude of strategies are being utilized by the teachers to engage students in the classroom activities and foster critical thinking which can ignite their interest in the lesson. However, very few researches have been conducted on students’ preferences in these different motivational strategies. This cross-sectional survey research explores the preferred motivational strategies in science instruction among 106 high school students in a public secondary school in Zambales, Philippines. The motivational strategies were classified based on Howard Gardner’s theory on multiple intelligences. The study found out that the students moderately preferred visual-auditory (M=2.88), logical-mathematical (M=2.70) and kinesthetic (M=2.60) motivational strategies. Science trivia, picture presentation, and mini labwork are the most common motivational strategies used by Science teachers. The study recommends that teachers may utilize engaging, relevant, and learner-centered motivational strategies to make Science instruction more alive and more effective. The use of varied strategies to arouse students’ interest may also be observed to cater the students’ multiple intelligences

    Linkage analysis of alcoholism-related electrophysiological phenotypes: genome scans with microsatellites compared to single-nucleotide polymorphisms

    Get PDF
    P300 amplitude is an electrophysiological quantitative trait that is correlated with both alcoholism and smoking status. Using the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism data, we performed model-free linkage analysis to investigate the relationship between alcoholism, P300 amplitude, and habitual smoking. We also analyzed the effect of parent-of-origin on alcoholism, and utilized both microsatellites (MS) markers and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We found significant evidence of linkage for alcoholism to chromosome 10; inclusion of P300 amplitude as a covariate provided additional evidence of linkage to chromosome 12. This same region on chromosome 12 showed some evidence for a parent-of-origin effect. We found evidence of linkage for the P300 phenotype to chromosome 7 in non-smokers, and to chromosome 17 in alcoholics. The effects of alcoholism and habitual smoking on P300 amplitude appear to have separate genetic determinants. Overall, there were few differences between MS and SNP genome scans. The use of covariates and parent-of-origin effects allowed detection of linkage not seen otherwise

    Ultra-rare genetic variation in common epilepsies: a case-control sequencing study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND:Despite progress in understanding the genetics of rare epilepsies, the more common epilepsies have proven less amenable to traditional gene-discovery analyses. We aimed to assess the contribution of ultra-rare genetic variation to common epilepsies. METHODS:We did a case-control sequencing study with exome sequence data from unrelated individuals clinically evaluated for one of the two most common epilepsy syndromes: familial genetic generalised epilepsy, or familial or sporadic non-acquired focal epilepsy. Individuals of any age were recruited between Nov 26, 2007, and Aug 2, 2013, through the multicentre Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project and Epi4K collaborations, and samples were sequenced at the Institute for Genomic Medicine (New York, USA) between Feb 6, 2013, and Aug 18, 2015. To identify epilepsy risk signals, we tested all protein-coding genes for an excess of ultra-rare genetic variation among the cases, compared with control samples with no known epilepsy or epilepsy comorbidity sequenced through unrelated studies. FINDINGS:We separately compared the sequence data from 640 individuals with familial genetic generalised epilepsy and 525 individuals with familial non-acquired focal epilepsy to the same group of 3877 controls, and found significantly higher rates of ultra-rare deleterious variation in genes established as causative for dominant epilepsy disorders (familial genetic generalised epilepsy: odd ratio [OR] 2·3, 95% CI 1·7-3·2, p=9·1 × 10-8; familial non-acquired focal epilepsy 3·6, 2·7-4·9, p=1·1 × 10-17). Comparison of an additional cohort of 662 individuals with sporadic non-acquired focal epilepsy to controls did not identify study-wide significant signals. For the individuals with familial non-acquired focal epilepsy, we found that five known epilepsy genes ranked as the top five genes enriched for ultra-rare deleterious variation. After accounting for the control carrier rate, we estimate that these five genes contribute to the risk of epilepsy in approximately 8% of individuals with familial non-acquired focal epilepsy. Our analyses showed that no individual gene was significantly associated with familial genetic generalised epilepsy; however, known epilepsy genes had lower p values relative to the rest of the protein-coding genes (p=5·8 × 10-8) that were lower than expected from a random sampling of genes. INTERPRETATION:We identified excess ultra-rare variation in known epilepsy genes, which establishes a clear connection between the genetics of common and rare, severe epilepsies, and shows that the variants responsible for epilepsy risk are exceptionally rare in the general population. Our results suggest that the emerging paradigm of targeting of treatments to the genetic cause in rare devastating epilepsies might also extend to a proportion of common epilepsies. These findings might allow clinicians to broadly explain the cause of these syndromes to patients, and lay the foundation for possible precision treatments in the future. FUNDING:National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and Epilepsy Research UK

    Treatment-Refractory Epilepsy: An Evidence-Based Approach to Antiepileptic Monotherapy

    No full text
    Treatment options for epilepsy have increased in the last decade with the introduction of several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). As drug selection becomes more challenging, the use of evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment decisions has become increasingly valued. The American Academy of Neurology's (AAN) guidelines for the use of new AEDs in refractory epilepsy offers many benefits, including expert panel recommendations based on clinically relevant questions with evidence-based responses. However, lack of evidence from randomized-controlled trials, particularly as they relate to monotherapy, limits the recommendations and their use in practice. The studies of new AEDs as monotherapy in treatment-refractory epilepsy are difficult to incorporate into clinical use because they are driven by Food and Drug Administration requirements to show superiority over placebo or pseudoplacebo (ie, low dose of active drug) rather than by clinical questions. However, based on Class I evidence, the AAN guidelines have granted Level A recommendations (established effectiveness) for oxcarbazepine and topiramate monotherapy, and a Level B recommendation (probable effectiveness) for lamotrigine monotherapy in the use of refractory partial epilepsy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend gabapentin, levetiracetam, tiagabine, or zonisamide monotherapy. No monotherapy AED trials have been conducted in refractory generalized epilepsy. Because no differences in efficacy have been reported for AEDs as initial therapy of partial seizures, differences in adverse events, such as weight gain, tremor, and hair loss, are key in drug selection. More comparative studies between the AEDs are necessary for both monotherapy and add-on therapy for treatment-refractory epilepsy

    Linkage analysis of alcoholism-related electrophysiological phenotypes: genome scans with microsatellites compared to single-nucleotide polymorphisms-0

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Linkage analysis of alcoholism-related electrophysiological phenotypes: genome scans with microsatellites compared to single-nucleotide polymorphisms"</p><p></p><p>BMC Genetics 2005;6(Suppl 1):S156-S156.</p><p>Published online 30 Dec 2005</p><p>PMCID:PMC1866778.</p><p></p>odel with ALDX2 as a binary trait, in only those individuals with P300 data available. Dashed line indicates model with P300 as a covariate. Sample sizes are 204 ARPs for MS, 200 for SNP data

    Linkage analysis of alcoholism-related electrophysiological phenotypes: genome scans with microsatellites compared to single-nucleotide polymorphisms-2

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Linkage analysis of alcoholism-related electrophysiological phenotypes: genome scans with microsatellites compared to single-nucleotide polymorphisms"</p><p></p><p>BMC Genetics 2005;6(Suppl 1):S156-S156.</p><p>Published online 30 Dec 2005</p><p>PMCID:PMC1866778.</p><p></p> distance in cM. Results are shown for the entire group (thin black line), the smoking subgroup (thick tan line), and the non-smoking subgroup (thick black line). Sample sizes in sib-pairs are 228 for MS smoking, 220 for MS non-smoking, 220 for SNP smoking, and 214 for SNP non-smoking groups
    corecore