Animal Botulism Outcomes in the AniBioThreat Project

Botulism disease in both humans and animals is a worldwide concern. Botulinum neurotoxins produced by Clostridium botulinum and other Clostridium species are the most potent biological substances known and are responsible for flaccid paralysis leading to a high mortality rate. Clostridium botulinum and botulinum neurotoxins are considered potential weapons for bioterrorism and have been included in the Australia Group List of Biological Agents. In 2010 the European Commission (DG Justice, Freedom and Security) funded a 3-year project named AniBioThreat to improve the EU's capacity to counter animal bioterrorism threats. A detection portfolio with screening methods for botulism agents and incidents was needed to improve tracking and tracing of accidental and deliberate contamination of the feed and food chain with botulinum neurotoxins and other Clostridia. The complexity of this threat required acquiring new genetic information to better understand the diversity of these Clostridia and develop detection methods targeting both highly specific genetic markers of these Clostridia and the neurotoxins they are able to produce. Several European institutes participating in the AniBioThreat project collaborated on this program to achieve these objectives. Their scientific developments are discussed here

Financing intersectoral action for health: a systematic review of co-financing models.

BACKGROUND: Addressing the social and other non-biological determinants of health largely depends on policies and programmes implemented outside the health sector. While there is growing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that tackle these upstream determinants, the health sector does not typically prioritise them. From a health perspective, they may not be cost-effective because their non-health outcomes tend to be ignored. Non-health sectors may, in turn, undervalue interventions with important co-benefits for population health, given their focus on their own sectoral objectives. The societal value of win-win interventions with impacts on multiple development goals may, therefore, be under-valued and under-resourced, as a result of siloed resource allocation mechanisms. Pooling budgets across sectors could ensure the total multi-sectoral value of these interventions is captured, and sectors' shared goals are achieved more efficiently. Under such a co-financing approach, the cost of interventions with multi-sectoral outcomes would be shared by benefiting sectors, stimulating mutually beneficial cross-sectoral investments. Leveraging funding in other sectors could off-set flat-lining global development assistance for health and optimise public spending. Although there have been experiments with such cross-sectoral co-financing in several settings, there has been limited analysis to examine these models, their performance and their institutional feasibility. AIM: This study aimed to identify and characterise cross-sectoral co-financing models, their operational modalities, effectiveness, and institutional enablers and barriers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if data was provided on interventions funded across two or more sectors, or multiple budgets. Extracted data were categorised and qualitatively coded. RESULTS: Of 2751 publications screened, 81 cases of co-financing were identified. Most were from high-income countries (93%), but six innovative models were found in Uganda, Brazil, El Salvador, Mozambique, Zambia, and Kenya that also included non-public and international payers. The highest number of cases involved the health (93%), social care (64%) and education (22%) sectors. Co-financing models were most often implemented with the intention of integrating services across sectors for defined target populations, although models were also found aimed at health promotion activities outside the health sector and cross-sectoral financial rewards. Interventions were either implemented and governed by a single sector or delivered in an integrated manner with cross-sectoral accountability. Resource constraints and political relevance emerged as key enablers of co-financing, while lack of clarity around the roles of different sectoral players and the objectives of the pooling were found to be barriers to success. Although rigorous impact or economic evaluations were scarce, positive process measures were frequently reported with some evidence suggesting co-financing contributed to improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: Co-financing remains in an exploratory phase, with diverse models having been implemented across sectors and settings. By incentivising intersectoral action on structural inequities and barriers to health interventions, such a novel financing mechanism could contribute to more effective engagement of non-health sectors; to efficiency gains in the financing of universal health coverage; and to simultaneously achieving health and other well-being related sustainable development goals

The grey zone between individualised goal and actual need : A CHAT analysis of student counselling within VET

The ambiguous policy-concepts ‘effectivity’ and ‘needs’ were introduced to Finnish VET. This research utilises cultural historical activity theory to analyse how different conflicting motives emerge within student counselling and to discuss the prospective development of VET. Managerialist approaches to accountability and competency-based training form a tension between the needs of persons in counselling on the one hand and effectiveness of counselling in relation to economy on the other. We ask, what types of needs are met within VET and from whose perspective is VET effective? Data includes ethnographic observations of counselling sessions (N=32) and semi-structured interviews (N=12). The results show the emphasised instrumental value of an individual in society. Measurement of atomistic and individualist achievements and institutional effectivity (accountability) have become important whilst actual needs and relational meaning for persons involved in counselling were obscured, viz., ‘the grey zone.’ Student counselling was skewed to focus on individualised goals and fragmented tasks whilst acknowledgement of human uniqueness and recognition of counselees/students as persons is needed. None of the latter provides measured accountability or direct and tangible competency and thus they become ignored. We call for democratic discussions about the meaning of VET, including persons of its primary concern: practitioners and students.Peer reviewe

Personal non-commercial use only

ABSTRACT. Objective. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The cytokine A PRoliferating-Inducing Ligand (APRIL) is strongly expressed in DLBCL in the general population and is detected in high concentrations in sera from subgroups of patients with RA and SLE. To investigate a possible association between APRIL and DLBCL in RA and SLE, we examined APRIL expression in lymphoma biopsies from patients with RA and SLE and from DLBCL patients without inflammatory disease. Methods. Lymphoma tissue from 95 RA, 12 SLE, and 63 comparator DLBCL cases were stained with anti-APRIL antibodies (Aprily-2). The percentage of positively stained cells of the comparator cases were divided into quartiles (1-4, where 4 = most stained) and compared with the results for the RA and SLE lymphomas. APRIL expression was correlated to clinical variables. Results. The odds ratio for high expression of APRIL (quartiles 3 and 4) was elevated in the SLE DLBCL (OR 23.6, 95% CI 2.4-231.2), but not in the RA DLBCL (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.0). RA patients in quartile 4 had higher cumulated RA disease activity than those in quartile 1 (p = 0.013). Epstein-Barr virus in the lymphoma tissue was associated with high APRIL expression (p = 0.009). Conclusion. The high expression of APRIL in DLBCL in SLE and in an RA subset might indicate an association between APRIL and lymphoma in these subsets of rheumatic diseases, but could also reflect a dysregulation of APRIL per se in these patien