Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE):a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND: Nearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR. METHODS: The PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and (18)F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival. DISCUSSION: If the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study)

Background: Recent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, EMR might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, EMR appears to be associated with fewer complications. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and EMR for the resection of large rectal adenomas. Methods/design. Multicenter randomized trial among 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with a rectal adenoma 3 cm, located between 115 cm ab ano, will be randomized to a TEM- or EMR-treatment strategy. For TEM, patients will be treated under general anesthesia, adenomas will be dissected en-bloc by a full-thickness excision, and patients will be admitted to the hospital. For EMR, no or conscious sedation is used, lesions will be resected through the submucosal plane i

Novel cryoballoon 180° ablation system for treatment of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia:a first-in-human study

Background The novel 180 degrees cryoballoon (CbAS (180) ) enables semicircumferential treatment over a length of 3cm per application. This first-in-human study evaluates its feasibility, efficacy, and safety for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. Methods This multicenter study consisted of dose-finding and extension phases. Dose-finding started with the lowest dose possible (1.0mm/s). For each dose, six patients were treated circumferentially over a 3-cm length. The dose was increased until the median BE regression was >= 60% without serious adverse events (SAEs). In the extension phase, the dose was confirmed in 19 new patients. The outcomes were technical success, BE regression after one treatment, and SAEs. Results 25 patients (median Prague C0M3) were included (6 dose-finding/19 extension). In two patients, the CbAS (180) could not be applied because of unstable balloon positioning. The technical success rate was 96% (22/23). In the six dose-finding patients, the starting dose resulted in median BE regression of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60%-97%) without SAEs and was thus considered effective. Overall median BE regression was 80% (95%CI 60%-90%). Conclusion Single-session CbAS (180) seems feasible, safe, and effective, and is a promising technique for the treatment of patients with BE neoplasia

A novel cryoballoon ablation system for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus:a first-in-human feasibility study

BACKGROUND:  Endoscopic cryoablation for Barrett's esophagus (BE) might offer advantages over heat-based ablation. Focal cryoballoon ablation has been promising for short-segment BE, whereas the novel 90°-swipe cryoballoon ablation system (CbSAS90) ablates larger areas in a single step (90° over 3 cm). The system allows for dose adjustment. CbSAS90 has been feasible and safe in animal and pre-esophagectomy studies. This is the first clinical study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of CbSAS90 for eradication of dysplastic BE. METHODS:  In this prospective study in dysplastic BE patients, dose finding started with semi-circumferential treatment at 0.8 mm/s (dose 1). The dose was escalated by reducing speed by 0.1 mm/s in six patients until BE surface regression was ≥ 80 % without complications ("effective dose"). The effective dose was subsequently confirmed with circumferential treatment in 12 new patients. Post-procedural pain (0 - 10) and dysphagia (0 - 4) were evaluated. Outcomes were feasibility, safety, and BE surface regression. RESULTS:  25 patients were included, with technically successful treatment in 92 % (95 %CI 73 % - 99 %). Median (95 %CI) BE surface regression was 78 % (50 % - 85 %) for dose 1 and 85 % (55 % - 95 %) for dose 2 (0.7 mm/s), which was defined as the effective dose. Circumferential treatment resulted in 93 % (88 % - 96 %) regression. Two of 12 patients with circumferential treatment developed strictures that required dilation. Median pain and dysphagia scores were low (0 - 3 and 0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CbSAS90 was feasible and effective for ablating larger BE areas. The optimal dose for circumferential treatment that balances safety and efficacy requires further evaluation

Natural course of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus:a scoping review and case series

Background and Aims: Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) aims to prevent progression to life-limiting cancer. However, HGD patients with a short life expectancy realize limited gains from this approach owing to competing mortality. Clinicians are poorly equipped to counsel such patients, because there are little data regarding survival in untreated HGD. We aimed to evaluate existing literature and describe a case series of patients with untreated HGD. Methods: We systematically reviewed Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, selecting studies describing the natural history of untreated HGD in BE. The primary outcomes were symptomatic esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and EAC-related death. In addition, cases in which HGD was left untreated were retrospectively identified in the Netherlands. We assessed the time until progression to clinically evident EAC. Results: A total of 3229 studies were identified, of which 3 were included. In 1 study, progression from HGD to clinically evident EAC occurred in 4 subjects after a median of 34 months. The remaining 2 cases progressed to clinically evident EAC after 70 and 115 months. In our previously unreported case series, 11 Dutch patients with flat HGD (n = 3) or HGD in a visible abnormality (n = 8) were included. Four of these 11 patients progressed to clinically evident EAC after a median 52 months (range, 17-78 months). Conclusions: The lag-time between the diagnosis of HGD and progression to clinically evident EAC varied from 1.5 to 10 years. EET for BE with HGD in patients with less than 3 years of life expectancy seems unlikely to be beneficial. These results may guide management decisions for patients with BE. (Netherlands Trial Registry, NL7039; NL-OMON29089.)</p

Development and external validation of a model to predict complex treatment after RFA for Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia

Background & Aims: Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia is safe and leads to complete eradication in the majority of patients. However, a subgroup will experience a more complex treatment course with a risk for failure or disease progression. Early identification of these patients may improve patient counseling and treatment outcomes. We aimed to develop a prognostic model for a complex treatment course. Methods: We collected data from a nationwide registry that captures outcomes for all patients undergoing endoscopic eradication therapy for early BE neoplasia. A complex treatment course was defined as neoplastic progression, treatment failure, or the need for endoscopic resection during the radiofrequency ablation treatment phase. We developed a prognostic model using logistic regression. We externally validated our model in an independent registry. Results: A total of 1386 patients were included, of whom 78 (6%) had a complex treatment course. Our model identified patients with a BE length of 9 cm or longer with a visible lesion containing high-grade dysplasia/cancer, and patients with less than 50% squamous conversion after radiofrequency ablation were identified as high risk for a complex treatment. This applied to 8% of the study population and included 93% of all treatment failures and 76% of all patients with advanced neoplastic progression. The model appeared robust in multiple sensitivity analyses and performed well in external validation (area under the curve, 0.84). Conclusions: We developed a prognostic model that identified patients with a BE length of 9 cm or longer and high-grade dysplasia/esophageal adenocarcinoma and those with poor squamous regeneration as high risk for a complex treatment course. The good performance in external validation suggests that it may be used in clinical management (Netherlands Trial Register: NL7039)

Vertical R1 margins are not always associated with residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection of Barrett's neoplasia:a nationwide cohort with dedicated pathology reassessment

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the proportion of patients with residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection (ER) for Barrett's neoplasia with confirmed tumor-positive vertical resection margin (R1v).METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with ER for Barrett's neoplasia with histologically documented R1v since 2008 in the Dutch Barrett Expert Centers. R1v was defined as cancer cells touching the vertical resection margin and Rx as not assessable margins. Reassessment of R1v specimen was performed by experienced pathologists until consensus was reached regarding vertical margins.RESULTS: 101/110 included patients had macroscopically complete resections (T1a n=17, T1b n=84), of which 99/101 (98%) ER specimens were reassessed. Reassessment confirmed R1v in 74 (75%) patients and found Rx in 16% and R0 in 9%. Presence of residual neoplasia could be assessed in 66/74 patients during endoscopic reassessment (n=52) and/or in the surgical resection specimen (n=14), of whom 33/66 (50%)had residual neoplasia. Residual neoplasia detected during endoscopy was always endoscopically visible and biopsies from a normal appearing ER-scar did not detect additional neoplasia. Twenty-five patients with no residual neoplasia during endoscopic reassessment underwent endoscopic follow-up for median 37 months(IQR 12-50), in which 4 developed a local recurrence(16.0%), all detected as visible abnormalities.CONCLUSIONS: Histological evaluation of ER margins appears challenging as 75% of documented R1v cases were confirmed during reassessment. After ER with R1v, 50% of the patients had no residual neoplasia. Endoscopic reassessment 8-12 weeks after ER seems accurately able to detect residual neoplasia and help to determine the most appropriate strategy for patients with R1v.</p

Endoscopic Resection Without Subsequent Ablation Therapy for Early Barrett’s Neoplasia: Endoscopic Findings and Long-Term Mortality

Introduction: After endoscopic resection (ER) of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE), it is recommended to ablate the remaining BE to minimize the risk for metachronous disease. However, we report long-term outcomes for a nationwide cohort of all patients who did not undergo ablation of the remaining BE after ER for early BE neoplasia, due to clinical reasons or performance status. Methods: Endoscopic therapy for BE neoplasia in the Netherlands is centralized in 8 expert centers with specifically trained endoscopists and pathologists. Uniformity is ensured by a joint protocol and regular group meetings. We report all patients who underwent ER for a neoplastic lesion between 2008 and 2018, without further ablation therapy. Outcomes include progression during endoscopic FU and all-cause mortality. Results: Ninety-four patients were included with mean age 74 (± 10) years. ER was performed for low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (10%), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) (25%), or low-risk esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (65%). No additional ablation was performed for several reasons; in 73 patients (78%), the main argument was expected limited life expectancy. Median C2M5 BE persisted after ER, and during median 21 months (IQR 11–51) with 4 endoscopies per patient, no patient progressed to advanced cancer. Seventeen patients (18%) developed HGD/EAC: all were curatively treated endoscopically. In total, 29/73 patients (40%) with expected limited life expectancy died due to unrelated causes during FU, none of EAC. Conclusion: In selected patients, ER monotherapy with endoscopic surveillance of the residual BE is a valid alternative to eradication therapy with ablation.</p

Optimal timing of simethicone administration prior to upper endoscopy: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Background and study aims Simethicone is useful as premedication for upper endoscopy because of its antifoaming effects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of simethicone administration on mucosal visibility. Patients and methods In this multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study, patients scheduled for upper endoscopy were randomized to receive 40 mg simethicone at the following time points prior to the procedure: 20 to 30 minutes (early group), 0 to 10 minutes (late group) or 20 mg simethicone at both time points (split-dose group). Images were taken from nine predefined locations in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum before endoscopic flushing. Each image was scored on mucosal visibility by three independent endoscopists on a 4-point scale (lower scores indicating better visibility), with adequate mucosal visibility defined as a score ≤ 2. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with adequate total mucosal visibility (TMV), reached if all median subscores for each location were ≤ 2. Results A total of 386 patients were included (early group: 132; late group: 128; split-dose group: 126). Percentages of adequate TMV were 55%, 42%, and 61% in the early, late, and split-dose group, respectively ( P < 0.01). Adequate TMV was significantly higher in the split-dose group compared to the late group ( P < 0.01), but not compared to the early group ( P = 0.29). Differences between groups were largest in the stomach, where percentages of adequate mucosal visibility were higher in the early (68% vs 53%, P = 0.03) and split-dose group (69% vs 53%, P = 0.02) compared to the late group. Conclusions Mucosal visibility can be optimized with early simethicone administration, either as a single administration or in a split-dose regimen