11 research outputs found
Impact Factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
A review of Garfield's journal impact factor and its specific implementation
as the Thomson Reuters Impact Factor reveals several weaknesses in this
commonly-used indicator of journal standing. Key limitations include the
mismatch between citing and cited documents, the deceptive display of three
decimals that belies the real precision, and the absence of confidence
intervals. These are minor issues that are easily amended and should be
corrected, but more substantive improvements are needed. There are indications
that the scientific community seeks and needs better certification of journal
procedures to improve the quality of published science. Comprehensive
certification of editorial and review procedures could help ensure adequate
procedures to detect duplicate and fraudulent submissions.Comment: 25 pages, 12 figures, 6 table
Progress of international scientific summer school in Turkey from 2007 to 2010: On the eve of 2014 event
[No abstract available
The effect of lanthanum on the mechanical function of the isolated perfused rat heart at different extracellular calcium concentrations
PubMed: 1808985[No abstract available
P-310 Evaluation of effects of antiarrhythmic therapy on left ventricular performance by tissue doppler echocardiography during follow-up after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Predictive Importance of Clinical, Angiographic Features and P-Wave Dispersion
A Statement on Ethics from the HEART Group
Over the past several years, the editors of leading international cardiovascular journals have met to form the HEART group and to discuss areas of growing, common interest. Recently, the
HEART group has developed a document that addresses general ethical principles in the conduct of the scientific process with which all of the editors concur. Published essentially simultaneously in all of the participating journals, including this journal, this document presents the ethical tenets accepted by all of the undersigned editors that will (continue to) guide their decisions in the editorial process. These are the general principles on which the HEART Group is based and by which we, as a group, abide; however, please note that individual journal members and their respective societies may have their own rules and regulations that supersede the guidelines of the HEART Group
