Detrended Fluctuation Analysis in the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients at risk: Model optimization and comparison with other metrics

[EN] Complexity analysis of glucose time series with Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) has been proved to be useful for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) development. We propose a modified DFA algorithm, review some of its characteristics and compare it with other metrics derived from continuous glucose monitorization in this setting. Several issues of the DFA algorithm were evaluated: (1) Time windowing: the best predictive value was obtained including all time-windows from 15 minutes to 24 hours. (2) Influence of circadian rhythms: for 48-hour glucometries, DFA alpha scaling exponent was calculated on 24hour sliding segments (1-hour gap, 23-hour overlap), with a median coefficient of variation of 3.2%, which suggests that analysing time series of at least 24-hour length avoids the influence of circadian rhythms. (3) Influence of pretreatment of the time series through integration: DFA without integration was more sensitive to the introduction of white noise and it showed significant predictive power to forecast the development of T2DM, while the pretreated time series did not. (4) Robustness of an interpolation algorithm for missing values: The modified DFA algorithm evaluates the percentage of missing values in a time series. Establishing a 2% error threshold, we estimated the number and length of missing segments that could be admitted to consider a time series as suitable for DFA analysis. For comparison with other metrics, a Principal Component Analysis was performed and the results neatly tease out four different components. The first vector carries information concerned with variability, the second represents mainly DFA alpha exponent, while the third and fourth vectors carry essentially information related to the two "pre-diabetic behaviours" (impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance). The scaling exponent obtained with the modified DFA algorithm proposed has significant predictive power for the development of T2DM in a high-risk population compared with other variability metrics or with the standard DFA algorithm.This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project PI17/00856 (Co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund, A way to make Europe). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Colás, A.; Vigil, L.; Vargas, B.; Cuesta Frau, D.; Varela, M. (2019). Detrended Fluctuation Analysis in the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients at risk: Model optimization and comparison with other metrics. PLoS ONE. 14(12):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225817S1151412Goldstein, B., Fiser, D. H., Kelly, M. M., Mickelsen, D., Ruttimann, U., & Pollack, M. M. (1998). Decomplexification in critical illness and injury: Relationship between heart rate variability, severity of illness, and outcome. Critical Care Medicine, 26(2), 352-357. doi:10.1097/00003246-199802000-00040Varela, M. (2008). The route to diabetes: Loss of complexity in the glycemic profile from health through the metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, Volume 1, 3-11. doi:10.2147/dmso.s3812Vikman, S., Mäkikallio, T. H., Yli-Mäyry, S., Pikkujämsä, S., Koivisto, A.-M., Reinikainen, P., … Huikuri, H. V. (1999). Altered Complexity and Correlation Properties of R-R Interval Dynamics Before the Spontaneous Onset of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation, 100(20), 2079-2084. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.20.2079Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Allen, C., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Carter, A., … Coates, M. M. (2016). Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet, 388(10053), 1459-1544. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31012-1Saudek, C. D., Derr, R. L., & Kalyani, R. R. (2006). Assessing Glycemia in Diabetes Using Self-monitoring Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c. JAMA, 295(14), 1688. doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1688Monnier, L., Colette, C., & Owens, D. R. (2008). Glycemic Variability: The Third Component of the Dysglycemia in Diabetes. Is it Important? How to Measure it? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(6), 1094-1100. doi:10.1177/193229680800200618Abdul-Ghani, M. A., Tripathy, D., & DeFronzo, R. A. (2006). Contributions of  -Cell Dysfunction and Insulin Resistance to the Pathogenesis of Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Impaired Fasting Glucose. Diabetes Care, 29(5), 1130-1139. doi:10.2337/dc05-2179(2017). 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care, 41(Supplement 1), S13-S27. doi:10.2337/dc18-s002Tabák, A. G., Herder, C., Rathmann, W., Brunner, E. J., & Kivimäki, M. (2012). Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. The Lancet, 379(9833), 2279-2290. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60283-9DeFronzo, R. A., Banerji, M. A., Bray, G. A., Buchanan, T. A., Clement, S., … Tripathy, D. (2009). Determinants of glucose tolerance in impaired glucose tolerance at baseline in the Actos Now for Prevention of Diabetes (ACT NOW) study. Diabetologia, 53(3), 435-445. doi:10.1007/s00125-009-1614-2Nathan, D. M., Davidson, M. B., DeFronzo, R. A., Heine, R. J., Henry, R. R., Pratley, R., & Zinman, B. (2007). Impaired Fasting Glucose and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Implications for care. Diabetes Care, 30(3), 753-759. doi:10.2337/dc07-9920Ogata, H., Tokuyama, K., Nagasaka, S., Tsuchita, T., Kusaka, I., Ishibashi, S., … Yamamoto, Y. (2012). The lack of long-range negative correlations in glucose dynamics is associated with worse glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Metabolism, 61(7), 1041-1050. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2011.12.007Kohnert, K.-D. (2015). Utility of different glycemic control metrics for optimizing management of diabetes. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(1), 17. doi:10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.17García Maset, L., González, L. B., Furquet, G. L., Suay, F. M., & Marco, R. H. (2016). Study of Glycemic Variability Through Time Series Analyses (Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Poincaré Plot) in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 18(11), 719-724. doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0208Service, F. J., O’Brien, P. C., & Rizza, R. A. (1987). Measurements of Glucose Control. Diabetes Care, 10(2), 225-237. doi:10.2337/diacare.10.2.225Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Supplement 1), 2466-2472. doi:10.1073/pnas.012579499Crenier, L., Lytrivi, M., Van Dalem, A., Keymeulen, B., & Corvilain, B. (2016). Glucose Complexity Estimates Insulin Resistance in Either Nondiabetic Individuals or in Type 1 Diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 101(4), 1490-1497. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-4035Rodríguez de Castro, C., Vigil, L., Vargas, B., García Delgado, E., García Carretero, R., Ruiz-Galiana, J., & Varela, M. (2016). Glucose time series complexity as a predictor of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 33(2), e2831. doi:10.1002/dmrr.2831Weber, C., & Schnell, O. (2009). The Assessment of Glycemic Variability and Its Impact on Diabetes-Related Complications: An Overview. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 11(10), 623-633. doi:10.1089/dia.2009.0043Pincus, S. M., Gladstone, I. M., & Ehrenkranz, R. A. (1991). A regularity statistic for medical data analysis. Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 7(4), 335-345. doi:10.1007/bf01619355Richman, J. S. (2007). Sample Entropy Statistics and Testing for Order in Complex Physiological Signals. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 36(5), 1005-1019. doi:10.1080/03610920601036481Platiša, M. M., Bojić, T., Pavlović, S. U., Radovanović, N. N., & Kalauzi, A. (2016). Generalized Poincaré Plots-A New Method for Evaluation of Regimes in Cardiac Neural Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Healthy Subjects. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00038García-Puig, J., Ruilope, L. M., Luque, M., Fernández, J., Ortega, R., & Dal-Ré, R. (2006). Glucose Metabolism in Patients with Essential Hypertension. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(4), 318-326. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.010Lepot, M., Aubin, J.-B., & Clemens, F. (2017). Interpolation in Time Series: An Introductive Overview of Existing Methods, Their Performance Criteria and Uncertainty Assessment. Water, 9(10), 796. doi:10.3390/w9100796Eke, A., Hermán, P., Bassingthwaighte, J., Raymond, G., Percival, D., Cannon, M., … Ikrényi, C. (2000). Physiological time series: distinguishing fractal noises from motions. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 439(4), 403-415. doi:10.1007/s004249900135Eke, A., Herman, P., Kocsis, L., & Kozak, L. R. (2002). Fractal characterization of complexity in temporal physiological signals. Physiological Measurement, 23(1), R1-R38. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/201King, A. B., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Kilpatrick, E. S., Langbakke, I. H., Begtrup, K., & Vilsbøll, T. (2017). A Fixed Ratio Combination of Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide (IDegLira) Reduces Glycemic Fluctuation and Brings More Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Within Blood Glucose Target Ranges. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 19(4), 255-264. doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0405Colas, A., Vigil, L., Rodríguez de Castro, C., Vargas, B., & Varela, M. (2018). New insights from continuous glucose monitoring into the route to diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 34(5), e3002. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3002Henriques, T., Munshi, M. N., Segal, A. R., Costa, M. D., & Goldberger, A. L. (2014). «Glucose-at-a-Glance». Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 8(2), 299-306. doi:10.1177/1932296814524095Hinton, P. R. (2004). Statistics Explained. doi:10.4324/9780203496787Van Cauter, E., Blackman, J. D., Roland, D., Spire, J. P., Refetoff, S., & Polonsky, K. S. (1991). Modulation of glucose regulation and insulin secretion by circadian rhythmicity and sleep. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 88(3), 934-942. doi:10.1172/jci115396Qian, J., & Scheer, F. A. J. L. (2016). Circadian System and Glucose Metabolism: Implications for Physiology and Disease. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 27(5), 282-293. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.00

Z-inertial fusion energy: power plant final report FY 2006.

This report summarizes the work conducted for the Z-inertial fusion energy (Z-IFE) late start Laboratory Directed Research Project. A major area of focus was on creating a roadmap to a z-pinch driven fusion power plant. The roadmap ties ZIFE into the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) initiative through the use of high energy fusion neutrons to burn the actinides of spent fuel waste. Transmutation presents a near term use for Z-IFE technology and will aid in paving the path to fusion energy. The work this year continued to develop the science and engineering needed to support the Z-IFE roadmap. This included plant system and driver cost estimates, recyclable transmission line studies, flibe characterization, reaction chamber design, and shock mitigation techniques

Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science

It is well documented that the majority of adults, children and families in need of evidence-based behavioral health interventionsi do not receive them [1, 2] and that few robust empirically supported methods for implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) exist. The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) represents a burgeoning effort to advance the innovation and rigor of implementation research and is uniquely focused on bringing together researchers and stakeholders committed to evaluating the implementation of complex evidence-based behavioral health interventions. Through its diverse activities and membership, SIRC aims to foster the promise of implementation research to better serve the behavioral health needs of the population by identifying rigorous, relevant, and efficient strategies that successfully transfer scientific evidence to clinical knowledge for use in real world settings [3]. SIRC began as a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded conference series in 2010 (previously titled the “Seattle Implementation Research Conference”; $150,000 USD for 3 conferences in 2011, 2013, and 2015) with the recognition that there were multiple researchers and stakeholdersi working in parallel on innovative implementation science projects in behavioral health, but that formal channels for communicating and collaborating with one another were relatively unavailable. There was a significant need for a forum within which implementation researchers and stakeholders could learn from one another, refine approaches to science and practice, and develop an implementation research agenda using common measures, methods, and research principles to improve both the frequency and quality with which behavioral health treatment implementation is evaluated. SIRC’s membership growth is a testament to this identified need with more than 1000 members from 2011 to the present.ii SIRC’s primary objectives are to: (1) foster communication and collaboration across diverse groups, including implementation researchers, intermediariesi, as well as community stakeholders (SIRC uses the term “EBP champions” for these groups) – and to do so across multiple career levels (e.g., students, early career faculty, established investigators); and (2) enhance and disseminate rigorous measures and methodologies for implementing EBPs and evaluating EBP implementation efforts. These objectives are well aligned with Glasgow and colleagues’ [4] five core tenets deemed critical for advancing implementation science: collaboration, efficiency and speed, rigor and relevance, improved capacity, and cumulative knowledge. SIRC advances these objectives and tenets through in-person conferences, which bring together multidisciplinary implementation researchers and those implementing evidence-based behavioral health interventions in the community to share their work and create professional connections and collaborations

Positron emission tomography and lymphomas

peer reviewe

Working between two worlds: Gang intervention and street liminality

This article analyzes ethnographic data collected from a gang intervention program to examine how former gang members use their experience to influence youth still involved in gang life. I argue that the interventionists possess a ‘street liminality’ that is constructed by their experiences living along the margins of both the street and conventional society. This street liminality enables the interventionists to exploit the connections they have to these two social realms, making resources accessible to barrio youth and helping them navigate criminalizing social institutions. However, they must constantly balance the interests of the youth they serve against those of the civil leaders they depend on for funding to ensure that they do not facilitate these youth’s criminalization. By illustrating the processes of how street liminalty is embodied, used, and negotiated, this article discusses how we can expand our understanding of liminality and recognize its potential for working around hierarchical boundaries