Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and prevalent heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial

Background: Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure. Methods: The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597. Findings: Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64-0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59-0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66-1·00 for all-cause death; all pinteraction>0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58-1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51-0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52-1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype. Interpretation: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group. Funding: Novo Nordisk

Cardiopoietic cell therapy for advanced ischemic heart failure: results at 39 weeks of the prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled CHART-1 clinical trial

Cardiopoietic cells, produced through cardiogenic conditioning of patients' mesenchymal stem cells, have shown preliminary efficacy. The Congestive Heart Failure Cardiopoietic Regenerative Therapy (CHART-1) trial aimed to validate cardiopoiesis-based biotherapy in a larger heart failure cohort

Abstract P6-12-07: The benefit of preoperative chemotherapy in an underinsured Hispanic population with poor use of screening mammography

Abstract Background: Despite prospective clinical trials demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy for nearly 2 decades, it may still be underutilized in underserved, uninsured populations most likely to present with advanced cancers. The current study was performed to evaluate the effect of preoperative chemotherapy (PC) in a Hispanic safety net population. Methods: A retrospective review of Hispanic breast cancer patients who presented at clinical stage 2 or higher and were treated from July 2001 to February May 2015 at a safety net hospital. Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated. Surgical outcomes were evaluated. Margin status was determined for those who underwent breast conservation. Results: The average age of the 266 patients was 45 years. 93% of the patients were insured with Medicaid or uninsured (70%). Only 24% of patients underwent screening mammography. 133 underwent PC and 133 had primary operations. Patients who underwent PC presented with larger cancers (5cm vs 3.5cm, p &amp;lt; 0.001). 96% of patients in PC group were not candidates for lumpectomy at presentation. However, lumpectomy was performed more often in those who underwent PC (75% vs. 57%, p = 0.01). Re-excision for margins were necessary less often in those who underwent PC (10.3% vs 27%, p = 0.01). Patients who underwent PC were also less likely to require an ALND (33% vs 47%, p = 0.04). Despite presentation at higher average clinical stage in patients who underwent PC, at average follow up of 52 months, risk of IBTR and risk of regional recurrence were similar in the PC and no-PC groups (IBTR: 4.4% vs 3%, p = 0.99 and Regional: 1.5% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.99). Breast cancer specific survival was 86.5% in the PC group compared to 84% in the no-PC group (p = 0.68). Patients in the no-PC group were less likely to comply with recommended chemotherapy.Conclusions: In this underinsured, Hispanic population who did not use screening mammography, preoperative chemotherapy allowed many women to undergo breast conservation, undergo fewer operations, and were less likely to require ALND. Risk of local and regional recurrence is low in these patients and comparable to those who underwent primary operation. Citation Format: Komenaka IK, Djenic B, Walters J, Hsu C-H, Nodora JN, Martinez ME, Bouton M, Mehta D. The benefit of preoperative chemotherapy in an underinsured Hispanic population with poor use of screening mammography. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-07.</jats:p

Unusual Thyroid Carcinoma Metastases: a Case Series and Literature Review

The most common sites of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer are the neck lymph nodes, while distant metastases typically involve the lungs, the bones, and less frequently the brain. Uncommon metastatic sites include the liver, adrenal gland, kidney, pancreas, and skin. The epidemiological aspects of thyroid metastases in rare sites are largely unknown and their identification could have a significant impact on patients management. A mini-series of unusual metastatic sites of thyroid carcinoma is proposed as a contribution to current knowledge on anatomopathological characteristics and clinical outcome. Of the six cases that were assessed, the metastases were the following: skin metastases (2), skin and pancreas metastases (1), renal metastasis (1), adrenal metastasis (1), and liver metastasis (1). In our experience, metastases in rare sites do not always represent a negative prognostic factor for disease outcome. In fact they can occur as single distant lesion and if surgically resectable, their treatment can also lead to local disease remission