33 research outputs found

    Net Community Production and Carbon Exchange From Winter to Summer in the Atlantic Water Inflow to the Arctic Ocean

    Get PDF
    The eastern Fram Strait and area north of Svalbard, are influenced by the inflow of warm Atlantic water, which is high in nutrients and CO2, influencing the carbon flux into the Arctic Ocean. However, these estimates are mainly based on summer data and there is still doubt on the size of the net ocean Arctic CO2 sink. We use data on carbonate chemistry and nutrients from three cruises in 2014 in the CarbonBridge project (January, May, and August) and one in Fram Strait (August). We describe the seasonal variability and the major drivers explaining the inorganic carbon change (CDIC) in the upper 50 m, such as photosynthesis (CBIO), and air-sea CO2 exchange (CEXCH). Remotely sensed data describes the evolution of the bloom and net community production. The focus area encompasses the meltwater-influenced domain (MWD) along the ice edge, the Atlantic water inflow (AWD), and the West Spitsbergen shelf (SD). The CBIO total was 2.2 mol C m–2 in the MWD derived from the nitrate consumption between January and May. Between January and August, the CBIO was 3.0 mol C m–2 in the AWD, thus CBIO between May and August was 0.8 mol C m–2. The ocean in our study area mainly acted as a CO2 sink throughout the period. The mean CO2 sink varied between 0.1 and 2.1 mol C m–2 in the AWD in August. By the end of August, the AWD acted as a CO2 source of 0.7 mol C m–2, attributed to vertical mixing of CO2-rich waters and contribution from respiratory CO2 as net community production declined. The oceanic CO2 uptake (CEXCH) from the atmosphere had an impact on CDIC between 5 and 36%, which is of similar magnitude as the impact of the calcium carbonate (CaCO3, CCALC) dissolution of 6–18%. CCALC was attributed to be caused by a combination of the sea-ice ikaite dissolution and dissolution of advected CaCO3 shells from the south. Indications of denitrification were observed, associated with sea-ice meltwater and bottom shelf processes. CBIO played a major role (48–89%) for the impact on CDIC.publishedVersio

    Tilførselsprogrammet 2011. Overvåking av forsuring av norske farvann

    Get PDF
    Denne rapporten gjelder undersøkelser av havforsuring som er utført av IMR, NIVA og BCCR i oppdrag fra Klif i 2011. Den er basert på målinger mellom Bergen-Kirknes og Tromsø-Longyearbyen utført av NIVA. Prøvetaking av vertikalen fra Torungen-Hirtshals, Svinøy-NW, Gimsøy-NW og Fugløya-Bjørnøya er utført av IMR. Resultatene fra Norskehavet viser en klar sesongvariasjon i øvre 100 m av vannsøylen, som for det meste er styrt av styrken på primærproduksjonen. I tillegg påvirkes karboninnholdet av kystvannet som brer seg vestover i løpet av sommeren. Metningsgraden for aragonitt (Ar) er mellom 1.95 til 1.6 på 300 m dyp. I Norskehavet befinner =1.6 seg på 500 m dyp, og i Nordsjøen på ca 200 m. I Norskehavet er det undermetning fra like under 1500 meters dyp av aragonitt og overmetning av kalsitt i hele vannsøylen. I Barentshavet lå Ar mellom 1.07-2.62 med min. verdier i kystområdet mellom Kirkenes og Tromsø i januar (1.07-2.03), mens Ar var 1.49-2.52 i desember, og karakterisert av en stor variasjon fra 1.67 til 2.62 som skyldes en økt biologisk produksjon. Historiske data er sammenlignet på Havforskningens hydrografiske seksjoner i 2011 og CARINA databasen. Primært ble data fra 1997-2011 i nord-vestlig retning fra Gimsøy og Svinøy benyttet for å studere trender i Norskehavet, men analysen omfatter også data fra Barentshavet. Trender viser en økning av karbonkonsentrasjonene målt i 2011 relativt til historiske data. Dette gjenspeiler hovedsakelig havets opptak av menneskeskapt CO2. Konklusjonen er at de fleste områder studert i denne rapporten er mettet i forhold til kalsitt, og undermetning av aragonitt viser seg på 1500 meters dyp i Norskehavet.Kli

    Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of the Norwegian Sea Pelagic Ecosystem

    Get PDF
    The System for Assessment of Ecological Condition, coordinated by the Norwegian Environment Agency, is intended to form the foundation for evidence-based assessments of the ecological condition of Norwegian terrestrial and marine ecosystems not covered by the EU Water Framework Directive. The reference condition is defined as “intact ecosystems”, i.e., a condition that is largely unimpacted by modern industrial activities. An ecosystem in good ecological condition does not deviate substantially from this reference condition in structure, functions or productivity. This report describes the first operational assessment of the ecological condition of the pelagic ecosystem in the Norwegian Sea. The assessment method employed is the Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition (PAEC1) and the current assessment has considered to what extent the Norwegian Sea pelagic ecosystem deviates from the reference condition2 by evaluating change in trajectories.Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of the Norwegian Sea Pelagic EcosystempublishedVersio

    Pelagiske økosystem i De nordiske hav - grunnlagsstudie knyttet til åpningsprosess for utforskning og utvinning av havbunnsmineraler på norsk kontinentalsokkel

    Get PDF
    Denne rapporten er en leveranse til bestillingen «Grunnlagsstudie: Pelagisk økosystem» fra Oljedirektoratet til Havforskningsinstituttet. Studien er bestilt i forbindelse med at regjeringen har igangsatt en prosess for åpning av norsk sokkel for havbunnsmineralvirksomhet. Rapporten sammenstiller vår nåværende kunnskap om de pelagiske økosystemenes struktur og funksjon og belyser viktige kunnskapshull. Det er lagt særlig vekt på å beskrive økosystemkomponenter og prosesser som er essensielle for arbeidet med planprogram for konsekvensutredning av havbunnsmineralvirksomhet i norske havområder, og fokus vil derfor tidvis være litt annerledes enn det man vil finne i en generell beskrivelse av Norskehavet, Islandshavet og Grønlandshavet. Vi har lagt mer vekt på eksisterende kunnskapshull, og fokusert mer på utredningsområdet og på økologi og prosesser i pelagisk sone i dyphavet, enn det som kan forventes i for eksempel en lærebok om plankton-, fisk eller sjøpattedyrøkologi. Selv om formålet dermed har farget fokuset for beskrivelsene, beskriver kapitlene generell fordeling og økologi i de pelagiske systemene i Norskehavet, Islandshavet og Grønlandshavet.publishedVersio

    Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of the North Sea Shelf Ecosystem

    Get PDF
    The System for Assessment of Ecological Condition, coordinated by the Norwegian Environment Agency, is intended to form the foundation for evidence-based assessments of the ecological condition of Norwegian terrestrial and marine ecosystems not covered by the EU Water Framework Directive. The reference condition is defined as “intact ecosystems”, i.e., a condition that is largely unimpacted by modern industrial anthropogenic activities. An ecosystem in good ecological condition does not deviate substantially from this reference condition in structure, functions or productivity. This report describes the first operational assessment of the ecological condition of the marine shelf ecosystem in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea and Skagerrak. The assessment method employed is the Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition (PAEC1) and the current assessment has considered to what extent the North Sea and Skagerrak shelf ecosystem deviates from the reference condition2 by evaluating change trajectories.Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of the North Sea Shelf EcosystempublishedVersio

    Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of Norwegian Barents Sea Shelf Ecosystems

    Get PDF
    The System for Assessment of Ecological Condition, coordinated by the Norwegian Environment Agency, is intended to form the foundation for evidence-based assessments of the ecological condition of Norwegian terrestrial and marine ecosystems not covered by the EU Water Framework Directive. The reference condition is defined as “intact ecosystems”, i.e., a condition that is largely unimpacted by modern industrial anthropogenic activities. An ecosystem in good ecological condition is defined as a system that does not deviate substantially from this reference condition in structure, functions or productivity. This means that, in practice, what is assessed here is the extent to which an ecosystem is impacted by anthropogenic drivers. This report describes the first operational assessment of the ecological condition of Norwegian Arctic and Sub-Arctic marine shelf ecosystems in the Barents Sea. The assessment method employed is the Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition (PAEC1), and the current assessment has considered to what extent the Barents Sea shelf ecosystems deviate from the reference condition2 by evaluating change trajectories.Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of Norwegian Barents Sea Shelf EcosystemspublishedVersio

    Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition of Norwegian Barents Sea Shelf Ecosystems

    Get PDF
    The System for Assessment of Ecological Condition, coordinated by the Norwegian Environment Agency, is intended to form the foundation for evidence-based assessments of the ecological condition of Norwegian terrestrial and marine ecosystems not covered by the EU Water Framework Directive. The reference condition is defined as “intact ecosystems”, i.e., a condition that is largely unimpacted by modern industrial anthropogenic activities. An ecosystem in good ecological condition is defined as a system that does not deviate substantially from this reference condition in structure, functions or productivity. This means that, in practice, what is assessed here is the extent to which an ecosystem is impacted by anthropogenic drivers. This report describes the first operational assessment of the ecological condition of Norwegian Arctic and Sub-Arctic marine shelf ecosystems in the Barents Sea. The assessment method employed is the Panel-based Assessment of Ecosystem Condition (PAEC1), and the current assessment has considered to what extent the Barents Sea shelf ecosystems deviate from the reference condition2 by evaluating change trajectories
    corecore