6 research outputs found
Correction: Comparison of “Live High-Train Low” in Normobaric versus Hypobaric Hypoxia
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114418.]
Overview of the study design separated by weeks (W.) and in order of the testing altitude, including the six months before the lead-in period where the training loads were assessed, the lead-in, the LHTL camp of 18 days, and the lead-out period.
<p>Testing included 3-km test = the 3-km running tests on the track near sea level; Pre-, Post-, Post-7 and Post-21 = testing sessions; LHTL = Live High-Train Low training camp for normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH), where athletes were exposed to both higher altitude for living and sleeping and lower altitude for training.</p
A. Daily objective training (D01-D18: day 01 to day 18) loads during the Live High-Train Low (LHTL) camp for normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) groups.
<p><b>B</b>. Weekly objective training loads during the six months before the intervention for NH and HH groups.</p
A. Daily values of inspired pressure of oxygen (P<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in mmHg) during the Live High-Train Low (LHTL) camps for the normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) groups.
<p><b>B</b>. Mean values of night oxygen pulse saturation (S<sub>p</sub>O<sub>2</sub>). Data are presented in mean ± standard error. Pre1-Pre2: measurements before the camps (1150 m, Prémanon, France); D01-D18: measurement during the camps (NH: hypoxic room in Prémanon, France; HH: Fiescheralp, Switzerland). <sup>#</sup>P<0.05, <sup>###</sup>P<0.001 for differences between groups.</p