Building trust in the quality of vaccines

To date, several COVID-19 vaccines have been authorized for the voluntary immunization of adults. The quick availability of multiple vaccines is a good strategy to achieve herd immunity during a pandemic. However, the fast-track development of vaccines during this pandemic has raised concerns regarding the quality, safety, and effectiveness of vaccines. In response, USP organized a roundtable to discuss challenges and to solicit input on ways to build trust in vaccines. Key discussion points included manufacturing capacity, availability of a skilled workforce, and investment in new technologies that would enable the safety and quality of vaccine products. There was also a consensus that a rigorous and transparent clinical trial design is essential for understanding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines

USP Reference Standard Monoclonal Antibodies: Tools to Verify Glycan Structure

The glycan profile is a critical quality attribute for pharmaceutical monoclonal antibodies due to the potential physiological impact of the glycan composition when used as a drug product. Monoclonal antibody reference standards are useful as system suitability samples for glycan profile testing. The development of future glycan profiling techniques could be better evaluated by testing well-characterized reference standards. The USP has introduced monoclonal antibody reference standards (i.e., USP mAb 001 RS, USP mAb 002 RS, and USP mAb 003 RS) with the glycan profiles reported herein that can be used to assess the analytical testing of monoclonal antibody glycan profiles. Comparison of the USP reference standards to other available reference standards (NISTmAb) is presented. The glycan profile of the USP monoclonal antibody reference standards covers a range of glycan species that complements other available reference standards. The USP mAb reference standards are a valuable tool that can be used to verify the glycan structure and provide the system suitability of analytical methods

COVID-19 vaccine platforms: Delivering on a promise?

The emergence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 has brought into sharp focus the need for a vaccine to prevent this disease. Vaccines have saved millions of lives since their introduction to the public over 200 years ago. The potential for vaccination reached new heights in the mid-20th century with the development of technologies that expanded the ability to create novel vaccines. Since then, there has been continued technological advancement in vaccine development. The resulting platforms provide the promise for solutions for many infectious diseases, including those that have been with us for decades as well as those just now emerging. Each vaccine platform represents a different technology with a unique set of advantages and challenges, especially when considering manufacturing. Therefore, it is essential to understand each platform as a separate product and process with its specific quality considerations. This review outlines the relevant platforms for developing a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each

Biomarkers in the Age of Omics: Time for a Systems Biology Approach

Limitations to biomarker discovery are not only technical or bioinformatic but conceptual as well. In our attempt to offer a solution, we are highlighting three issues that we think are limiting progress in biomarkers discovery. First, the confusion stemming from the imposition of a pathology-type immunohistochemical marker (IHCM) concept on omics data without fully understanding the characteristics and limitations of IHCMs as applied in clinical pathology. Second, the lack of serious consideration for the scope of disease heterogeneity. Third, the refusal of the biomedical community to borrow from other biological disciplines their well established methods for dealing with heterogeneity. Therefore, real progress in biomarker discovery will be attained when we recognize that an omics biomarker cannot be assigned and validated without a priori data modeling and subtyping of the disease itself to reveal the extent of its heterogeneity, and its omics' clonal aberrations (drivers) underlying its subtypes and pathways' diversity. To further support our viewpoints, we are contributing a novel a systems biology method such as parsimony phylogenetic approach for disease modeling prior to biomarker circumscription. As an analytical approach that has been successfully used for a half of a century in other biological disciplines, parsimony phylogenetics simultaneously achieves several objectives: it provides disease modeling in a hierarchical phylogenetic classification, identifies biomarkers as the shared derived expressions or mutations—synapomorphies, constructs the omics profiles of specimens based on the most parsimonious arrangement of their heterogeneous data, and permits network profiling of affected signaling pathways as the biosignature of disease classes