8 research outputs found

    "I did not intend to stop. I just could not stand cigarettes any more." A qualitative interview study of smoking cessation among the elderly

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Every year, more than 650,000 Europeans die because they smoke. Smoking is considered to be the single most preventable factor influencing health. General practitioners (GP) are encouraged to advise on smoking cessation at all suitable consultations. Unsolicited advice from GPs results in one of 40-60 smokers stopping smoking. Smoking cessation advice has traditionally been given on an individual basis. Our aim was to gain insights that may help general practitioners understand why people smoke, and why smokers stop and then remain quitting and, from this, to find fruitful approaches to the dialogue about stopping smoking.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Interviews with 18 elderly smokers and ex-smokers about their smoking and decisions to smoke or quit were analysed with qualitative content analysis across narratives. A narrative perspective was applied.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six stages in the smoking story emerged, from the start of smoking, where friends had a huge influence, until maintenance of the possible cessation. The informants were influenced by "all the others" at all stages. Spouses had vital influence in stopping, relapses and continued smoking. The majority of quitters had stopped by themselves without medication, and had kept the tobacco handy for 3-6 months. Often smoking cessation seemed to happen unplanned, though sometimes it was planned. With an increasingly negative social attitude towards smoking, the informants became more aware of the risks of smoking.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>"All the others" is a clue in the smoking story. For smoking cessation, it is essential to be aware of the influence of friends and family members, especially a spouse. People may stop smoking unplanned, even when motivation is not obvious. Information from the community and from doctors on the negative aspects of smoking should continue. Eliciting life-long smoking narratives may open up for a fruitful dialogue, as well as prompting reflection about smoking and adding to the motivation to stop.</p

    COPD in the elderly : diagnostic criteria, symptoms and smoking. Quantitative and qualitative studies of persons over sixty years of age in The Tromsø studies.

    No full text
    SUMMARY Smokers benefit from the enjoyment and fellowship smoking brings in the short term, yet may cause diseases and disability later in life. This thesis is about COPD, the spirometry criteria for diagnosis, the predictive value of respiratory symptoms, and smoking and its cessation. Paper 1 and 2 are quantitative, epidemiological studies, which were based on a cross sectional population study in the city of Tromsø, Norway, in 2001. We chose to do our research on people aged 60 years and above since COPD is usually detected in this age group, and we had access to a representative sample from the Tromsø 5 study. In addition to spirometry the papers are based on data from questionnaires. The research question in paper 1was: Can we use FEV1 /FVC<70% as a criterion of COPD in all ages? Main results paper 1: The frequency of FEV1 /FVC ratio <70% was approximately 7% in never smokers aged 60–69 years compared to 16–18% in those of 70 years of age or more (p<0.001). FEV1 /FVC ratio <70% among never smokers aged 60–69 years was as frequent as FEV1 /FVC ratio <65% among never smokers older than 70 years. Conclusion: Adjustments of the GOLD criteria for diagnosing COPD are needed, and FEV1 / FVC ratios down to 65% should be regarded as normal when aged 70 years and older. The research question in paper 2 was: What role may symptoms play in the diagnosis of airflow limitation? Main results paper 2: The prevalence of any airflow limitation, (defined as FEV1 /FVC ratio <70% in subjects <70 years old and <65% in subjects ≥70 years old) was 15.5% and 20.8%, in women and men, respectively. Whereas the corresponding prevalences of severe airflow limitation (FEV1 <50% predicted) were 3.4% and 4.9%. The increased risk of having any airflow limitation corresponded to an OR 2.4 among ex-smokers and OR 5.8 among current smokers compared to never smokers. The prevalence of airflow limitation was more than doubled amongst never-and ex-smokers when two or more of the symptoms wheeze, dyspnoea or cough with phlegm were reported, compared to only one. Ex-smokers reporting two symptoms had a similar risk of airflow limitation as current smokers not reporting any symptoms. Conclusion: Respiratory symptoms are valuable predictors of airflow limitation, and should be emphasized when selecting patients for spirometry. Paper 3 is a qualitative document, based on interviews with 18 participants of 58 years of age and older. Research question in paper 3: “What makes people start smoking, and a smoker to quit and maintain quitted?” Main results: The influence of “all the others” is essential when starting to smoke. In the process of stopping smoking, relapses and continued smoking, the spouses have a vital influence. Smoking cessation often seemed to be unplanned. Finally with an increasingly negative social attitude towards smoking, increased the informant`s awareness of the risks of smoking. Conclusion: “All the others” is a clue in the smoking story. For smoking cessation, it is essential to be aware of the influence of friends and family members, especially a spouse. People may stop smoking unplanned, even when motivation is not obvious. Information from the community and doctors on the negative aspects of smoking should continue. Eliciting life-long smoking narratives may open up for a fruitful dialogue, as well as prompting reflection about smoking and adding to the motivation to stop

    A new diagnosis of asthma or COPD is linked to smoking cessation - The Tromsø study

    Get PDF
    Background: Patients with COPD have had a lower tendency to quit smoking compared to patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). We wanted to investigate if this is still true in a Norwegian population. Methods: Our data came from the fifth and sixth Tromsø surveys, which took place in 2001–2002 and 2007–2008. The predictors of smoking cessation were evaluated in a cohort of 4,497 participants who had stated their smoking status in both surveys. Results: Of the 4,497 subjects in the cohort, 1,150 (25.6%) reported daily smoking in Tromsø 5. In Tromsø 6, 428 had quit (37.2%). A new diagnosis of obstructive lung disease (asthma or COPD) and CHD were both associated with increased quitting rates, 50.6% (P=0.01) and 52.1% (P=0.02), respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis with smoking cessation as outcome, the odds ratios (ORs) of a new diagnosis of obstructive lung disease and of CHD were 1.7 (1.1–2.7) and 1.7 (1.0–2.9), respectively. Male sex had an OR of 1.4 (1.1–1.8) compared to women in the multivariable model, whereas the ORs of an educational length of 13–16 years and ≥17 years compared to shorter education were 1.6 (1.1–2.2) and 2.5 (1.5–4.1), respectively. Conclusion: The general trend of smoking cessation in the population was confirmed. Increased rates of smoking cessation were associated with a new diagnosis of heart or lung disease, and obstructive lung disease was just as strongly linked to smoking cessation as was CHD. This should encourage the pursuit of early diagnosis of COPD. Keywords: smoking cessation, cohort study, COPD, asthma, coronary heart diseas
    corecore