A novel form of human disease with a protease-sensitive prion protein and heterozygosity methionine/valine at codon 129: Case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder in humans included in the group of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies or prion diseases. The vast majority of sCJD cases are molecularly classified according to the abnormal prion protein (PrP^Sc) conformations along with polymorphism of codon 129 of the PRNP gene. Recently, a novel human disease, termed "protease-sensitive prionopathy", has been described. This disease shows a distinct clinical and neuropathological phenotype and it is associated to an abnormal prion protein more sensitive to protease digestion.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report the case of a 75-year-old-man who developed a clinical course and presented pathologic lesions compatible with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and biochemical findings reminiscent of "protease-sensitive prionopathy". Neuropathological examinations revealed spongiform change mainly affecting the cerebral cortex, putamen/globus pallidus and thalamus, accompanied by mild astrocytosis and microgliosis, with slight involvement of the cerebellum. Confluent vacuoles were absent. Diffuse synaptic PrP deposits in these regions were largely removed following proteinase treatment. PrP deposition, as revealed with 3F4 and 1E4 antibodies, was markedly sensitive to pre-treatment with proteinase K. Molecular analysis of PrP^Scshowed an abnormal prion protein more sensitive to proteinase K digestion, with a five-band pattern of 28, 24, 21, 19, and 16 kDa, and three aglycosylated isoforms of 19, 16 and 6 kDa. This PrP^Scwas estimated to be 80% susceptible to digestion while the pathogenic prion protein associated with classical forms of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease were only 2% (type VV2) and 23% (type MM1) susceptible. No mutations in the PRNP gene were found and genotype for codon 129 was heterozygous methionine/valine.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A novel form of human disease with abnormal prion protein sensitive to protease and MV at codon 129 was described. Although clinical signs were compatible with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, the molecular subtype with the abnormal prion protein isoforms showing enhanced protease sensitivity was reminiscent of the "protease-sensitive prionopathy". It remains to be established whether the differences found between the latter and this case are due to the polymorphism at codon 129. Different degrees of proteinase K susceptibility were easily determined with the chemical polymer detection system which could help to detect proteinase-susceptible pathologic prion protein in diseases other than the classical ones.</p

Plan de Acción en España para la erradicación de la poliomelitis: Vigilancia de la Parálisis Flácida Aguda y Vigilancia de Enterovirus en España. Informe 2020

Centro Nacional de Epidemiología y Centro Nacional de Microbiología. ISCIII. Plan de acción en España para la Erradicación de la Poliomielitis. Vigilancia de la Parálisis Flácida Aguda y Vigilancia de Enterovirus en España, Informe año 2020. Madrid, 5 de noviembre de 2021.[ES] En España la situación libre de polio se monitoriza con la vigilancia de Parálisis Flácida Aguda (PFA) en niños menores de 15 años, como recomienda la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). La vigilancia la realizan los servicios de vigilancia autonómicos y la red de laboratorios de PFA y a nivel nacional se coordina en el Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (CNE, ISCIII) y en el Laboratorio de Poliovirus del Centro Nacional de Microbiología (CNM, ISCIII). En el año 2020 en España no hubo casos de poliomielitis. Se notificaron 0,17 casos de PFA por 100.000 niños menores de 15 años, por debajo del objetivo de sensibilidad establecido por la OMS de un caso de PFA al año por cada 100.000 menores de 15 años. Solamente se detectaron enterovirus no-polio (EVNP) en las muestras de dos casos (EV-D68 y EV-B, respectivamente). En España también se realiza la vigilancia de EVNP en otros síndromes neurológicos para complementar el sistema de vigilancia de PFA. En las muestras investigadas en 2020 no se identificó ningún poliovirus y los EVNP más frecuentemente identificados fueron E-18, CV-A6 y E-21. Mientras haya circulación de poliovirus en el mundo hay que mantener activos los sistemas de vigilancia para detectar a tiempo cualquier importación de poliovirus. [EN] Spain monitors its polio-free status by conducting surveillance for cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) in children less than 15 years of age, as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The AFP surveillance is performed by the 19 Regional Epidemiological Surveillance Units and the AFP Surveillance Laboratory Network, coordinated at national level by the National Centre for Epidemiology (CNE. ISCIII) and the National Poliovirus Laboratory at Nacional Center of Microbiology (CNM. ISCIII) respectively. In 2020, no cases of poliomyelitis were reported from clinical surveillance; Spain reported 0.17 non-polio AFP cases per 100,000 children, below the WHO's performance criterion for a sensitive surveillance system (1 non-polio AFP cases per 100,000 children). The non-polio enteroviruses EV-D68, EV-B were identified from clinical specimens collected from AFP cases. Spain also performs enterovirus surveillance to complement the clinical system In 2020, non poliovirus were identified; The non-polioviruses E-18, CV-A6 y E-21 were the most frequently identified serotypes. As long as poliovirus is circulating in the world, surveillance systems must remain active to detect any importation of poliovirus in a timely manner.1. Resumen. 2. Introducción. 3. Resultados de la vigilancia de Parálisis Flácida Aguda (PFA) en España, 2020. 4. Resultados de la vigilancia de enterovirus, España 2020. 5. Resultados de la vigilancia medioambiental de poliovirus. España, 2020. 6. Sistema de Información Microbiológica (SIM). Meningitis por enterovirus. Tendencia. 7. Conclusiones.N

Annual Epidemiological Report: Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance and Enterovirus Surveillance, Spain, 2019

Centro Nacional de Epidemiología y Centro Nacional de Microbiología. ISCIII. Plan de acción en España para la Erradicación de la Poliomielitis. Vigilancia de la Parálisis Flácida Aguda y Vigilancia de Enterovirus en España, año 2019. Madrid, 1 julio 2020.[ES]Los resultados de la vigilancia de parálisis flácida aguda (PFA) y de la vigilancia de enterovirus (EV) muestran que en España en el año 2019 no hubo casos de poliomielitis ni circulación de poliovirus. La sensibilidad del sistema está por debajo del objetivo establecido por la OMS–Europa de 1 caso de PFA al año por cada 100.000 menores de 15 años, al situarse en 0,55/104 hab (0,58/104 <15años en 2018 ). Sin embargo, su estudio una vez detectados es adecuado. El índice de vigilancia, que sintetiza la sensibilidad del sistema de vigilancia y su estudio en laboratorio, fue de 0,28, similar a otros años. Gracias a la vigilancia de EV se detectó un PV derivado de vacuna (PVDV) en un paciente excretor inmunodeprimido; además se hallaron diferentes EV-no polio, los serotipos identificados fundamentalmente fueron E-7, E-30, E-11, CV-A6 y E-13. En 2019 la OMS declaró la eliminación del PV salvaje tipo 3(PVS3) a nivel mundial, aunque resulta preocupante el aumento en la detección de PVS1 y PVDVc 2 tanto en muestras humanas como medioambientales. La Evaluación de la Comisión Regional de Certificación clasifica a España en 2018 como de riesgo bajo de transmisión de poliovirus. En Europa hay tres países con riesgo alto, debido fundamentalmente a la baja inmunidad de su población. Hay que mantener los sistemas ya establecidos de vigilancia de la circulación de EV -polio y no polio- (vigilancia de PFA, meningitis víricas y EV), de manera que permitan detectar a tiempo la circulación inesperada de un poliovirus o de otro tipo de EV clínicamente relevante. [EN]The results of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and enterovirus (EV) surveillance show that there were no cases of polio or poliovirus circulation in Spain in 2019. The sensitivity of the system is below the target set by WHO-Europe of 1 case of AFP per year per 100,000 children under 15 years, at 0.55/104 inhab (0.58/104 <15 years in 2018 ). However, their study once detected is adequate. The surveillance index, which synthesizes the sensitivity of the surveillance system and its laboratory study, was 0.28, similar to other years. Thanks to the surveillance of EV, a vaccine derived PV (PVDV) was detected in an immunosuppressed excretory patient; in addition, different non-polio-EV were found. The serotypes identified were mainly E-7, E-30, E-11, CV-A6 and E-13. In 2019 the WHO declared the elimination of wild PV type 3 (PVS3) worldwide, although the increase in detection of PVS1 and cVP2 in both human and environmental samples is of concern. The evaluation of the Regional Certification Commission classifies Spain in 2019 as having a low risk of poliovirus transmission. In Europe there are three countries at high risk, mainly due to the low immunity of their population. The already established systems for surveillance of the circulation of EV-polio and non-polio- (surveillance of AFP, viral meningitis and EV) must be maintained, so that the unexpected circulation of a poliovirus or other clinically relevant EV can be detected in time.N

Antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing habits in oral implant surgery in the Netherlands:a cross-sectional survey

Background: There seems to be no consensus on the prescription of prophylactic antibiotics in oral implant surgery. The Dutch Association of Oral Implantology (NVOI) guidelines do not include a clear policy on prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions for oral implant surgery among healthy patients. The purpose of the study was to determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly prescribed in the Netherlands by general dentists, maxillofacial surgeons and oral implantologists in conjunction with oral implant surgery among healthy patients and to assess the type and amount of prophylactic antibiotic prescribed. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study is based on a web survey. A questionnaire developed in the United States of America was translated and slightly adjusted for use in the Netherlands. It contained predominantly close-ended questions relating to demographics, qualifications, antibiotic type, prescription duration and dosage. An email including an introduction to the study and an individual link to the questionnaire was sent in February 2018 to a sample of 600 general dental practitioners and all 302 specialized dentists (oral implantologists, periodontists and maxillofacial surgeons) recognized by the NVOI. Overall, 902 questionnaires were anonymously sent. Finally, 874 potential participants were reached. Collected data were analyzed through descriptive statistics. Results: In total, 218 (24.9%) participants responded to the questionnaire, including 45 females (20.8%) and 171 males (79.2%). Overall, 151 (69.9%) regularly placed oral implants. Of them, 79 (52.7%) prescribe antibiotics only in specific situations, 66 (43.7%) regularly, and 5 (3.3%) did not prescribe antibiotics at all. Overall, 83 participants who prescribe antibiotics did so both pre- and postoperatively (57.2%), 47 only preoperatively (32.4%) and 12 exclusively postoperatively (8.3%). A single dose of 2000 mg of amoxicillin orally one hour prior to surgery was the most prescribed preoperative regimen. The most frequently prescribed postoperative regimen was 500 mg of amoxicillin three times daily for five days after surgery. On average, participants prescribe a total of 7018 mg of antibiotics before, during or after oral implant surgery. Conclusions: Antibiotic prophylaxis in conjunction with oral implant surgery is prescribed in the Netherlands on a large scale, and recommendations based on the last published evidence are frequently not followed

Non‐impacted tooth extractions and antibiotic treatment: A RCT study

Objectives: A controlled, single-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate usefulness of antibiotics in preventing pain and complications after tooth extractions and benefits of probiotics in reducing gastro-intestinal symptoms associated with antibiotic therapy. Materials and methods: A total of 159 patients were enrolled in this trial. After tooth extractions, patients were allocated to one of the groups: group 1 received postoperatively amoxicillin&nbsp;+&nbsp;clavulanic acid; group 2 received the same antibiotic therapy with an adjunctive probiotic treatment; and group 3 received neither antibiotics nor probiotics. Follow-up visits were planned at 7, 14, and 21&nbsp;days after tooth extractions (T1, T2, and T3), and parameters assessed were pain, presence of abscess, edema, fever, alveolitis, trismus, pain, difficulty in daily routine activities, and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Results: The number of patients reporting pain at T1 was significantly higher in the control group when compared to group 2 (p&nbsp;=.016), while no difference for pain intensity was observed between groups. No surgical site infection was observed in any of the groups. Intestinal symptoms seemed to be tackled by probiotic administration. Conclusions: Pain was the most important symptom in the control group. Antibiotics were not necessary after non-impacted tooth extractions, and probiotics can reduce gastro-intestinal symptoms associated with antibiotics