Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Cutibacterium acnes Endocarditis

Importance: It is suggested that patients with Cutibacterium acnes endocarditis often present without fever or abnormal inflammatory markers. However, no study has yet confirmed this statement. Objective: To assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with C acnes endocarditis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A case series of 105 patients presenting to 7 hospitals in the Netherlands and France (4 university hospitals and 3 teaching hospitals) with definite endocarditis according to the modified Duke criteria between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, was performed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrieved from medical records. Cases were identified by blood or valve and prosthesis cultures positive for C acnes, retrieved from the medical microbiology databases. Infected pacemaker or internal cardioverter defibrillator lead cases were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed in November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included symptoms at presentation, presence of prosthetic valve endocarditis, laboratory test results at presentation, time to positive results of blood cultures, 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, type of treatment (conservative or surgical), and endocarditis relapse rates. Results: A total of 105 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.1 [13.9] years; 96 men [91.4%]; 93 patients [88.6%] with prosthetic valve endocarditis) were identified and included. Seventy patients (66.7%) did not experience fever prior to hospital admission, nor was it present at hospitalization. The median C-reactive protein level was 3.6 mg/dL (IQR, 1.2-7.5 mg/dL), and the median leukocyte count was 10.0 × 103/µL (IQR, 8.2-12.2 × 103/µL). The median time to positive blood culture results was 7 days (IQR, 6-9 days). Surgery or reoperation was indicated for 88 patients and performed for 80 patients. Not performing the indicated surgical procedure was associated with high mortality rates. Seventeen patients were treated conservatively, in accordance with the European Society of Cardiology guideline; these patients showed relatively high rates of endocarditis recurrence (5 of 17 [29.4%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This case series suggests that C acnes endocarditis was seen predominantly among male patients with prosthetic heart valves. Diagnosing C acnes endocarditis is difficult due to its atypical presentation, with frequent absence of fever and inflammatory markers. The prolonged time to positivity of blood culture results further delays the diagnostic process. Not performing a surgical procedure when indicated seems to be associated with higher mortality rates. For prosthetic valve endocarditis with small vegetations, there should be a low threshold for surgery because this group seems prone to endocarditis recurrence.</p

Impact du parcours de soins sur le pronostic et la prise en charge des endocardites infectieuses

Introduction : l’endocardite infectieuse (EI) est une pathologie grave pour laquelle la prise en charge des patients est réalisée au sein de centres de référence disposant d’un service de chirurgie cardiaque ou au sein de centres non référents. L’objectif de cette étude est de déterminer le pronostic des patients traités pour une EI en fonction de leur parcours de soins. Méthodes : nous avons réalisé une étude prospective multicentrique incluant les patients hospitalisés pour EI au sein de 22 centres hospitaliers du sud-est de la France. Les patients étaient répartis en trois groupes en fonction de leur parcours de soins : prise en charge exclusive en centre de référence (groupe 1), début de prise en charge en centre non référent avec transfert dans un second temps vers un centre de référence chirurgical (groupe 2) ou prise en charge uniquement en centre non référent (groupe 3). Le critère de jugement principal était la survenue d’un décès toute cause confondue dans l’année suivant l’inclusion. Les critères de jugements secondaires étaient l’application des recommandations européennes et la comparaison des données démographiques et microbiologiques en fonction du parcours de soins.Résultats : entre janvier 2014 et juin 2017, trois-cent-quarante-deux patients ont été inclus de manière consécutive (119 dans le groupe 1, 111 dans le groupe 2 et 112 dans le groupe 3). La mortalité à un an était de 26% (88 décès) et n’était pas significativement différente entre les groupes 1 et 2 (20% vs 21%, p=0,83). Les patients du groupe 3 présentaient une mortalité à un an (37%) supérieure comparé aux patients des groupes 1 et 2 (p<0,001). L’appartenance au groupe 3 était un facteur prédictif de mortalité à un an en analyse multivariée (HR 2,56; IC 95% 1,44-4,55, p=0,001). Les recommandations européennes n’étaient pas appliquées de manière identique au sein des trois groupes (p=0,04). Les patients appartenant au groupe 3 étaient significativement plus âgés (p<0,001) et présentaient plus de comorbidités (p<0,001) que dans les autres groupes.Conclusion : le pronostic des patients atteints d’EI est influencé par leur parcours de soins. Les patients pris en charge exclusivement en centre non référent présentent un moins bon pronostic que les patients traités au sein des centres de référence ou chirurgicaux

Impact of urgent surgery in non-complicated left-sided native-valve infective endocarditis with large vegetations

International audienc

Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Left-Sided Native Bivalvular Infective Endocarditis

International audienceBackground: Most cases of left-sided native valve infective endocarditis (IE) involve a single valve and little is known concerning IE that simultaneously affects the aortic and mitral valves. Methods: We aimed to determine the characteristics, identify the prognostic factors, and define the effect of early surgery for patients with left-sided native bivalvular IE. This analysis included 1340 consecutive patients who presented with definite acute left-sided native valve IE in a 2-centre cohort study. Results: A bivalvular involvement was present in 257 patients (19%). Patients with bivalvular IE had more embolic events (P = 0.044), congestive heart failure (P = 0.016), vegetations, and perivalvular complications (both P < 0.001) than those with monovalvular IE. Early surgery was more frequent for patients with bivalvular IE (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was higher for patients with bivalvular IE than for those with monovalvular IE (24.5% vs 17.6%; P = 0.008), even after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.73]; P < 0.001). Estimated 10-year survival was 70% +/- 1% for monovalvular IE and 59% +/- 3% for bivalvular IE (P = 0.002). Bivalvular IE was still associated with mortality in multivariable Cox analysis, after adjustment for covariates including age, neurological events, congestive heart failure, Staphylococcus spp infection, perivalvular complications, and early surgery (hazard ratio, 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.11]; P < 0.001). Early surgery was associated with increased survival for patients with bivalvular IE (79% +/- 4% vs 35% +/- 6%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Bivalvular involvement is frequent in left-sided native valve IE, is associated with more embolic events and congestive heart failure than monovalvular IE, and patients are at a high risk of death. Early surgery is associated with improved survival and should be systematically discussed in the absence of contraindication

Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Left-Sided Native Bivalvular Infective Endocarditis

International audienceBackground: Most cases of left-sided native valve infective endocarditis (IE) involve a single valve and little is known concerning IE that simultaneously affects the aortic and mitral valves. Methods: We aimed to determine the characteristics, identify the prognostic factors, and define the effect of early surgery for patients with left-sided native bivalvular IE. This analysis included 1340 consecutive patients who presented with definite acute left-sided native valve IE in a 2-centre cohort study. Results: A bivalvular involvement was present in 257 patients (19%). Patients with bivalvular IE had more embolic events (P = 0.044), congestive heart failure (P = 0.016), vegetations, and perivalvular complications (both P < 0.001) than those with monovalvular IE. Early surgery was more frequent for patients with bivalvular IE (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was higher for patients with bivalvular IE than for those with monovalvular IE (24.5% vs 17.6%; P = 0.008), even after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.73]; P < 0.001). Estimated 10-year survival was 70% +/- 1% for monovalvular IE and 59% +/- 3% for bivalvular IE (P = 0.002). Bivalvular IE was still associated with mortality in multivariable Cox analysis, after adjustment for covariates including age, neurological events, congestive heart failure, Staphylococcus spp infection, perivalvular complications, and early surgery (hazard ratio, 1.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.11]; P < 0.001). Early surgery was associated with increased survival for patients with bivalvular IE (79% +/- 4% vs 35% +/- 6%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Bivalvular involvement is frequent in left-sided native valve IE, is associated with more embolic events and congestive heart failure than monovalvular IE, and patients are at a high risk of death. Early surgery is associated with improved survival and should be systematically discussed in the absence of contraindication

Western Immunoblotting for the Diagnosis of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus gallolyticus Infective Endocarditis

International audienceBlood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) remains a diagnostic challenge. In our center, despite a systematic and exhaustive microbiological diagnostics strategy, 22% of patients with BCNE remain without an identified etiology. In an effort to determine the relevance of using Western blot (WB) for the etiological diagnosis of BCNE in patients with early antibiotic use, we developed specific assays for the major infective endocarditis (IE) causative agents, namely, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus anginosus, and Streptococcus gallolyticus. Our technique was effective to identify the antigenic profiles of the four tested agents, but cross-reactions with S. aureus and S. anginosus antigens were frequent. A scoring method was developed for the diagnosis of E. faecalis and S. gallolyticus IE using the presence of reactivity to at least two antigenic bands for each bacterium and the positivity to at least one of the Ef300, Ef72, or Ef36 proteic bands for E. faecalis, and positivity for the two Sg75 and Sg97 proteic bands for S. gallolyticus. We tested these diagnostic criteria in a prospective cohort of 363 patients with suspected IE. Immunoblotting for the diagnosis of E. faecalis IE showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99%. The positive and negative predictive values were 73 and 100%, respectively. Regarding S. gallolyticus infection, immunoblot had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95%. However, the positive predictive value was 22%, whereas the predictive negative value was 100%. Using WB, we identified a potential etiological agent in 4 of 14 BCNE cases with no identified pathogen. In conclusion, WB constitutes a promising and helpful method to diagnose E. faecalis or S. gallolyticus IE in patients with early antibiotic uptake and negative blood cultures

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Management and Prognosis of Infective Endocarditis

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious condition which is difficult to diagnose and to treat, both medically and surgically. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the management of patients with IE. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study including patients hospitalized for IE during the pandemic (Group 2) compared with the same period the year before (Group 1). We compared clinical, laboratory, imagery, therapeutic, and patient outcomes between the two groups. Results: A total of 283 patients were managed for possible or definite IE (164 in Group 1 and 119 in Group 2). There were more intravenous drug-related IE patients in Group 2 (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in surgery including intra-cardiac device extraction (p = 0.412) or time to surgery (p = 0.894). The one-year mortality was similar in both groups (16% versus 17.7%, p = 0.704). The recurrence rate was not significantly different between the two groups (5.9% in Group 2 versus 9.1% in Group 1, p = 0.311). Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not appear to have had a negative impact on the management of patients with IE. Maintenance of the activities of the endocarditis team within the referral centre probably contributed to this result. Nevertheless, the high proportion of intravenous drug-addicted patients in the pandemic cohort suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a major psychosocial impact

Atrioventricular conduction disorders in aortic valve infective endocarditis

International audienceBackground: Aortic valve infective endocarditis may be complicated by high-degree atrioventricular block in up to 10-20% of cases.Aim: To assess high-degree atrioventricular block occurrence, contributing factors, prognosis and evolution in patients referred for aortic infective endocarditis.Methods: Two hundred and five patients referred for aortic valve infective endocarditis between January 2018 and March 2021 were included in this study. A comprehensive assessment of clinical, electrocardiographic, biological, microbiological and imaging data was conducted, with a follow-up carried out over 1 year.Results: High-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 22 (11%) patients. In univariate analysis, high-degree atrioventricular block was associated with first-degree heart block at admission (odds ratio 3.1; P=0.015), periannular complication on echocardiography (odds ratio 6.9; P&lt;0.001) and severe biological inflammatory syndrome, notably C-reactive protein (127 vs 90mg/L; P=0.011). In-hospital mortality (12.7%) was higher in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio 4.0; P=0.011) in univariate analysis. Of the 16 patients implanted with a permanent pacemaker for high-degree atrioventricular block and interrogated, only four (25%) were dependent on the pacing function at 1-year follow-up.Conclusions: High-degree atrioventricular block is associated with high inflammation markers and periannular complications, especially if first-degree heart block is identified at admission. High-degree atrioventricular block is a marker of infectious severity, and tends to raise the in-hospital mortality rate. Systematic assessment of patients admitted for infective endocarditis suspicion, considering these contributing factors, could indicate intensive care unit monitoring or even temporary pacemaker implantation in those at highest risk

A Massive Number of Extracellular Tropheryma whipplei in Infective Endocarditis: A Case Report and Literature Review

International audienceWhipple’s disease (WD) is a chronic multisystemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei . If this bacterium presents an intracellular localization, associated with rare diseases and without pathognomonic signs, it is often subject to a misunderstanding of its physiopathology, often a misdiagnosis or simply an oversight. Here, we report the case of a patient treated for presumed rheumatoid arthritis. Recently, this patient presented to the hospital with infectious endocarditis. After surgery and histological analysis, we discovered the presence of T. whipplei . Electron microscopy allowed us to discover an atypical bacterial organization with a very large number of bacteria present in the extracellular medium in vegetation and valvular tissue. This atypical presentation we report here might be explained by the anti-inflammatory treatment administrated for our patient’s initial diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis