Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dan Nilai Pasar Perusahaan

The objective of this study was to investigate influence of firm’sintellectual capital on their financial performance and market value. The objects of this paper are manufacturing industries listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2007 to 2008. By using 41 companies sample using purposive sampling method. This study used simple regression to examinethe influence intellectual capital (Value added intellectual capital (VAIC)) to financial performances and company market value. To examine the influence of three component of intellectual capital (capital employed efficiency(VACA), human capital efficiency (VAHU) and structural capital efficiency (STVA) to financial performances and company market value, this study uses multiple regression. The results showed that only VAHU has significant influence to company market value and only STVA has significant influenceto financial performance

Power analysis of implant failure.

<p>Estimated sample size of a logistic regression model depending on a varying odds ratio with a significance level of 5%, a power of 95%.</p

3/4/25, conseil des ministres, [M. Anatole] de Monzie [quittant l'Elysée] : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 99651Appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : Pho20RolImage de press

Implant return ratio versus diameter.

<p>Implant return ratio (IRR) of early (A), intermediate (B), and late (C) failure of four diameters: 3.8, 4.3, 5, and 6 mm.</p

Implant return ratio versus type.

<p>Implant return ratio (IRR) of early failure (A), intermediate failure (B) and late failure (C) of root-shaped implants (1), screw-shaped implants with polished neck (2), and screw-shaped implants with reduced polished neck (3).</p

Perception of aesthetics and personality traits in orthognathic surgery patients: A comparison of still and moving images

<div><p>It is common in practicing orthognathic surgery to evaluate faces with retruded or protruded chins (dysgnathic faces) using photographs. Because motion may alter how the face is perceived, we investigated the perception of faces presented via photographs and videos. Two hundred naïve raters (lay persons, without maxillo facial surgery background) evaluated 12 subjects with varying chin anatomy [so-called skeletal Class I (normal chin), Class II (retruded chin), and Class III (protruded chin)]. Starting from eight traits, with Factor analysis we found a two-Factor solution, i.e. an "aesthetics associated traits cluster" and a Factor "personality traits cluster" which appeared to be uncorrelated. Internal consistency of the Factors found for photographs and videos was excellent. Generally, female raters delivered better ratings than males, but the effect sizes were small. We analyzed differences and the respective effect magnitude between photograph and video perception. For each skeletal class the aesthetics associated dimensions were rated similarly between photographs and video clips. In contrast, specific personality traits were rated differently. Differences in the class-specific personality traits seen on photographs were "smoothed" in the assessment of videos, which implies that photos enhance stereotypes commonly attributed to a retruded or protruded chin.</p></div

Gender-related differences.

<p>Ratings for photographs and video clips, for Factor I (aesthetics) and Factor II (personality).</p

Stimuli, model persons with Class I (norm), Class II (retruded chin), and Class III (protruded chin).

<p>The persons wore no make-up, the hair was covered by a surgeons cap, to minimize distractions from the face anatomy.</p

Results of GLM for repeated measures for Factor I (Aesthetics associated traits) and for Factor II (Personality).

<p>Note that for the Aesthetics Traits Cluster Factor (A) there is almost no difference between photo and video in any class. Within the Personality Traits Cluster Factor (B) the photo ratings received higher scores in Class II and lower scores in Class III, which implies that photos enhance stereotypes commonly attributed to a retruded (Class II) or protruded (Class III) chin.</p

Seven-point Likert scale for subjective rating.

<p>Each of the eight items (trait pairs) was rated along the scale.</p