T cell-inflamed gene expression profile and PD-L1 expression and pembrolizumab efficacy in advanced esophageal cancer

Aim: Investigate the relationship between response to pembrolizumab and expression of the 18-gene T cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) or PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) in esophageal cancer. Materials & methods: This analysis included heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who received pembrolizumab in the single-arm, phase II study KEYNOTE-180. PD-L1 CPS was evaluated with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Results: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, trends toward enrichment for responders were observed for patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumors. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a trend was observed for TcellinfGEP but not for PD-L1. Conclusion: TcellinfGEP and PD-L1 CPS may enrich for responders to pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02559687 (ClinicalTrials.gov

261 Association of T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile and PD-L1 status with efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal cancer from KEYNOTE-180

BackgroundKey biomarkers under investigation for the ability to predict response to monotherapy PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab include PD-L1, TMB, MSI, and T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP). The KEYNOTE-180 trial (NCT02559687) was a single-arm phase 2 study of pembrolizumab as third-line or greater therapy in advanced/metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). ORR was 9.9% and median DOR was NR at the primary analysis. We investigated the relationship in KEYNOTE-180 between response to pembrolizumab and T-cell–inflamed GEP or PD-L1 expression by histology.MethodsPatients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤2 years until disease progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. The end points for this analysis were ORR, DOR, and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by central review and OS in the SCC and adenocarcinoma populations by GEP (non-low [≥–1.540] or low [<–1.540]; cutoff prespecified) and PD-L1 (CPS ≥10 or <10). Tumor GEP was determined using the NanoString nCounter Analysis System. PD-L1 expression was characterized using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Data cutoff date was July 30, 2018.ResultsOf 121 total patients, 118 had an evaluable GEP score and 121 had an evaluable PD-L1 CPS. Fifty-one patients (42.1%) had GEPnon-lowtumors, 58 (48.0%) had CPS ≥10 tumors, and 31 (25.6%) had GEPnon-low/CPS ≥10 tumors; 63 patients (52.1%) had SCC and 58 (47.9%) had adenocarcinoma. ORR was 15.4% with GEPnon-low and 13.5% with GEPlow among patients with SCC and 12% and 0% among patients with adenocarcinoma, respectively (table 1). ORR was 20% with CPS ≥10 and 7.1% with CPS <10 among patients with SCC and 4.3% and 5.7%, respectively, among patients with adenocarcinoma (table 2). Median OS was slightly higher among patients with SCC in the GEPnon-low subgroup and the CPS ≥10 subgroup versus GEPlow and CPS <10 subgroups, respectively (tables 1, 2); this trend was reversed among patients with adenocarcinoma (tables 1, 2). Median PFS ranged from 1.9 to 2.1 across histology/biomarker subgroups. Median DOR was NR regardless of GEP or CPS status (tables 1, 2).Abstract 261 Table 1Response by GEP status and histologyaAnalysis by biomarker status was not possible because of the small sample size.Abstract 261 Table 2Response by PD-L1 status and histologyaAnalysis by biomarker status was not possible because of the small sample size.ConclusionsIn KEYNOTE-180, data in a small number of patients suggested that measures of inflammation, like PD-L1 and GEP, may enrich for responses to pembrolizumab. In SCC, some trends toward enrichment were observed for both biomarkers, although the trend was stronger for PD-L1 CPS ≥10. In adenocarcinoma, a trend was observed for GEP but not for PD-L1; the small number of responders is limiting, and further studies are needed to understand molecular correlates in adenocarcinoma.AcknowledgementsMedical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Tim Peoples, MA, ELS, and Holly C. Cappelli, PhD, CMPP, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov, NCT02559687Ethics ApprovalThe study and the protocol were approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each site.ConsentAll patients provided written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial

Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials

Background Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers of various cancers, including nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain metastases at the diagnosis of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable population included adult patients (aged >= 18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months' follow-up. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up). These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001). Findings Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64-88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (IQR 13.4-20.2). Median duration of response was 24.6 months (95% CI 11.4-34.8). In the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten [8%]) and neutropenia (five [4%]). 15 (11%) patients had serious treatmentrelated adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system disorders (four [3%]) and cardiac disorders (three [2%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, snaking it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved