Modelo de inteligencia emocional para la solución de conflictos en las organizaciones / pág. 41-63

Moderna organizations are making decisions and managing organizational problems very often, for this reason, it was proposed as an objective to describe the emotional intelligence models for conflict resolution in organizations. For this purpose, the bibliographic review was applied as a methodology, through which various criteria of experts in this topic were extracted, finding as main findings that the theory of emotional intelligence has direct links with decision-making, leadership, motivation, organizational climate, and conflict management and resolution. Indeed, it was observed that certain components of the emotional intelligence models refer to the resolution of organizational conflicts, such as the emotional aptitude and alchemy of the Cooper and Sawaf model; the interdependent faculty of the Goleman model, and the interrelated branches of Mayer, Salovey and Caruso. The results highlight the importance of the application of the Mayer and Salovey skill model, which considers that emotional intelligence is conceptualized through four basic skills, such as the ability to perceive, value and express emotions accurately, the ability to access and / or generate feelings that facilitate thinking; the ability to understand emotions and emotional knowledge and the ability to regulate emotions promoting emotional and intellectual growth. In conclusion, the literature on emotional intelligence is projected towards the solution of organizational conflicts and the creation of harmonious work environments to enhance performance, productivity and social well-being.Las organizaciones modernas se encuentran tomando decisiones y manejando problemas organizacionales con mucha frecuencia, por esta razón, se planteó como objetivo describir los modelos de inteligencia emocional para la solución de conflictos en las organizaciones. Para tal efecto, se aplicó como metodología la revisión bibliográfica, mediante la cual se extrajeron diversos criterios de expertos en este tópico, encontrándose como hallazgos principales que la teoría de inteligencia emocional tiene vínculos directos con la toma de decisiones, el liderazgo, la motivación, el clima organizacional, y el manejo y solución de conflictos. En efecto, se observó que ciertos componentes de los modelos de inteligencia emocional hacen referencia a la solución de conflictos organizacionales, como, la aptitud y alquimia emocional del modelo de Cooper y Sawaf; la facultad interdependiente del modelo Goleman, y las ramas interrelacionadas de Mayer, Salovey y Caruso. Los resultados resaltan la importancia que tiene la aplicación del modelo de habilidad de Mayer y Salovey, el cual considera que la inteligencia emocional se conceptualiza a través de cuatro habilidades básicas, como, la habilidad para percibir, valorar y expresar emociones con exactitud, la habilidad para acceder y/o generar sentimientos que faciliten el pensamiento; la habilidad para comprender emociones y el conocimiento emocional y la habilidad para regular las emociones promoviendo un crecimiento emocional e intelectual. En conclusión, la literatura sobre inteligencia emocional se proyecta hacia la solución de conflictos organizacionales y la creación de ambientes de trabajo armónicos para potenciar el desempeño, productividad y bienestar social

What Is the Support for Conspiracy Beliefs About COVID-19 Vaccines in Latin America? A Prospective Exploratory Study in 13 Countries

Conspiracy theories about COVID-19 began to emerge immediately after the first news about the disease and threaten to prolong the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by limiting people’s willingness of receiving a life-saving vaccine. In this context, this study aimed to explore the variation of conspiracy beliefs regarding COVID-19 and the vaccine against it in 5779 people living in 13 Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela) according to sociodemographic variables such as gender, age, educational level and source of information about COVID-19. The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic between September 15 and October 25, 2021. The Spanish-language COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (ECCV-COVID) and a sociodemographic survey were used. The results indicate that, in most countries, women, people with a lower educational level and those who receive information about the vaccine and COVID-19 from family/friends are more supportive of conspiracy ideas regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. In the case of age, the results vary by country. The analysis of the responses to each of the questions of the ECCV-COVID reveals that, in general, the countries evaluated are mostly in some degree of disagreement or indecision regarding conspiratorial beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. The findings could help open further study which could support prevention and treatment efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic

Design and Cross-Cultural Invariance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (COVID-VCBS) in 13 Latin American Countries

"Aims: Over the past 2 years, the vaccine conspiracy beliefs construct has been used in a number of different studies. These publications have assessed the determinants and outcomes of vaccine conspiracy beliefs using, in some cases, pooled data from different countries, and compared the results across these contexts. However, studies often do not consider measurement invariance as a necessary requirement for comparative analyses. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the crosscultural MI of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (COVID-VCBS) in 12 Latin American countries. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory analysis and alignment method were applied to test measurement invariance in a large number of groups. Results: The COVID-VCBS showed robust psychometric properties and measurement invariance for both factor loadings and crosstabs. Also, a higher level of acceptance of conspiracy beliefs about vaccines is necessary to respond to higher response categories. Similarly, greater acceptance of conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines was related to a lower intention to be vaccinated. Conclusion: The results allow for improved understanding of conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines in the countries assessed; furthermore, they provide researchers and practitioners with an invariant measure that they can use in cross-cultural studies in Latin America. However, further studies are needed to test invariance in other countries, with the goal of developing a truly international measure of conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines.

Network analysis of the relationships between conspiracy beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccine and symptoms of fear of COVID-19 in a sample of latin american countries

The present study examined how conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines specifically relate to symptoms of fear of COVID-19 in a sample of four South American countries. A total of 1785 people from Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru participated, responding to a sociodemographic survey, the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19 S) and the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale-COVID-19 (VCBS-COVID-19). Network analysis identified the most important symptoms of fear and conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines (nodes) and the associations between them (edges). In addition, the robustness of the network of these indicators of centrality and the possible differences in the structure and connectivity of the networks between the four countries were evaluated. The results suggest that the nodes with the highest centrality were items 2 and 5 of the FCV-19 S and item 2 of the VCBS-COVID-19. Likewise, item 6 is the belief that most predicts conspiracy beliefs about vaccines against COVID-19; while item 6 was the symptom that most predicts fear of COVID-19. The findings strongly support cross-cultural similarities in the networks across the four countries rather than differences. Although it was expected that a higher presence of symptoms of fear of COVID-19 may lead people to compensate for their fear by believing in conspiratorial ideas about vaccines and, consequently, rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine, the results do not clearly show this relationship. This could lead other researchers to generate evidence to explain the differences between Latin American countries and countries in other contexts in terms of vaccination rates. This evidence could be useful to develop policies favoring vaccination against COVID-19 that are more contextualized to the Latin American region, characterized by social instability and economic recession during the pandemic

Network analysis of the relationships between conspiracy beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccine and symptoms of fear of COVID-19 in a sample of latin american countries

"The present study examined how conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines specifcally relate to symptoms of fear of COVID-19 in a sample of four South American countries. A total of 1785 people from Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru participated, responding to a sociodemographic survey, the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19 S) and the Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale-COVID-19 (VCBS-COVID-19). Network analysis identifed the most important symptoms of fear and conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines (nodes) and the associations between them (edges). In addition, the robustness of the network of these indicators of centrality and the possible diferences in the structure and connectivity of the networks between the four countries were evaluated. The results suggest that the nodes with the highest centrality were items 2 and 5 of the FCV-19 S and item 2 of the VCBS-COVID-19. Likewise, item 6 is the belief that most predicts conspiracy beliefs about vaccines against COVID-19; while item 6 was the symptom that most predicts fear of COVID-19. The fndings strongly support cross-cultural similarities in the networks across the four countries rather than diferences. Although it was expected that a higher presence of symptoms of fear of COVID-19 may lead people to compensate for their fear by believing in conspiratorial ideas about vaccines and, consequently, rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine, the results do not clearly show this relationship. This could lead other researchers to generate evidence to explain the diferences between Latin American countries and countries in other contexts in terms of vaccination rates. This evidence could be useful to develop policies favoring vaccination against COVID-19 that are more contextualized to the Latin American region, characterized by social instability and economic recession during the pandemic.

IV Foro Internacional de Ganadería Sustentable: conectividad ecosistémica y articulación territorial hacia la Agenda 2030

En este espacio plural de análisis y reflexiones, buscamos articular conceptos y posibilidades para los territorios de montaña del centro de México, dando importancia a medios de vida vinculados a la ganadería y su interacción ecosistémica, fundamentado en innovaciones, casos de éxito e iniciativas emblemáticas nacionales e internacionales. La socialización de experiencias es uno de los pilares para transitar hacia la sostenibilidad de los sistemas productivos ganaderos: compartir logros e iniciativas, crear sinergias e identificar vulnerabilidades desde distintos enfoques.GIZ, Agencia de Cooperación Aleman

What is the support for conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America? A prospective exploratory study in 13 Countries

Las teorías de conspiración sobre el COVID-19 comenzaron a surgir inmediatamente después de las primeras noticias sobre la enfermedad y amenazan con prolongar el impacto negativo de la pandemia de COVID-19 al limitar la disposición de las personas a recibir una vacuna que salve vidas. En este contexto, este estudio tuvo como objetivo explorar la variación de las creencias conspirativas sobre el COVID-19 y la vacuna contra él en 5779 personas que viven en 13 países de América Latina (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, México, Paraguay, Perú, Uruguay y Venezuela) según variables sociodemográficas como género, edad, nivel educativo y fuente de información sobre COVID-19. El estudio se realizó durante la pandemia de COVID-19 entre el 15 de septiembre y el 25 de octubre de 2021. Se utilizó la Escala de Creencias de Conspiración sobre la Vacuna contra el COVID-19 en español (ECCV-COVID) y una encuesta sociodemográfica. Los resultados indican que, en la mayoría de los países, las mujeres, las personas con menor nivel educativo y quienes reciben información sobre la vacuna y el COVID-19 de familiares/amigos apoyan más las ideas conspirativas respecto a la vacuna contra el COVID-19

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake