Exploring preferences for domain-specific goal management in patients with polyarthritis: what to do when an important goal becomes threatened?

Usually priorities in goal management—intended to minimize discrepancies between a given and desired situation—are studied as person characteristics, neglecting possible domain-specific aspects. However, people may make different decisions in different situations depending on the importance of the personal issues at stake. Aim of the present study therefore was to develop arthritis-related vignettes to examine domain-specific goal management and to explore patients’ preferences. Based on interviews and literature, situation-specific hypothetical stories were developed in which the main character encounters a problem with a valued goal due to arthritis. Thirty-one patients (61 % female, mean age 60 years) evaluated the face validity of the newly developed vignettes. Secondly, 262 patients (60 % female, mean age 63 years) were asked to come up with possible solutions for the problems with attaining a goal described in a subset of the vignettes. Goal management strategies within the responses and the preference for the various strategies were identified. The 11 developed vignettes in three domains were found to be face-valid. In 90 % of the responses, goal management strategies were identified (31 % goal maintenance, 29 % goal adjustment, 21 % goal disengagement, and 10 % goal re-engagement). Strategy preference was related to domains. Solutions containing goal disengagement were the least preferred. Using vignettes for measuring domain-specific goal management appears as valuable addition to the existing questionnaires. The vignettes can be used to study how patients with arthritis cope with threatened goals in specific domains from a patient’s perspective. Domain-specific strategy preference emphasizes the importance of a situation-specific instrument

The longitudinal relation between patterns of goal management and psychological health in people with arthritis: The need for adaptive flexibility

Objectives Due to their disease, patients with polyarthritis face the task of reconciling their threatened personal goals with their capabilities. Previous cross-sectional research on patients with chronic disease related higher levels of goal management strategies to lower levels of distress and higher levels of well-being. This study was the first to focus longitudinally on goal management patterns that combined strategies originating from different goal management theories. Our first study objective was to identify patterns that consisted of various strategies of goal management among patients with polyarthritis. Subsequently, the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between these patterns and the psychological health of the patients were studied. Methods A longitudinal questionnaire study with three measurements of goal management and psychological health was conducted among 331 patients with polyarthritis. Stability of goal management over time was analysed with ANOVAs. Patterns were identified using cluster analysis at baseline, based on the following strategies: Goal maintenance, goal adjustment, goal disengagement, and goal reengagement. Longitudinal relationships between the patterns and psychological health (specifically: Depression, anxiety, purpose in life, positive affect, and social participation) were analysed using a generalized estimating equations analysis. Results Three goal management patterns were found: ‘Moderate engagement’, ‘Broad goal management repertoire’, and ‘Holding on’. Patients with the ‘Broad goal management repertoire’ pattern had the highest level of psychological health. The ‘Holding on’ pattern was identified as the most unfavourable in terms of psychological health. Over time, stable differences in levels of psychological health between the patterns were found. Conclusions This study was the first to reveal patterns of several goal management strategies and their longitudinal relationship to psychological health. Psychosocial support for arthritis patients with lower psychological health should focus on helping patients to become familiar with a broad range of goal management strategies when dealing with threatened goals

A goal management intervention for patients with polyarthritis and elevated levels of depressive symptoms: a quasiexperimental study

Purpose: Goal was to establish whether an intervention that aims to increase goal management competencies is effective in decreasing elevated levels of depressive symptoms and increasing well-being in patients with polyarthritis. Materials and methods: Eighty-five persons with polyarthritis and elevated levels of depressive symptoms participated in the goal management intervention consisting of six group-based meetings. A quasi-experimental design with baseline measurement, follow-up at 6 months and a reference group of 151 patients from an observational study was applied. Primary outcome was depression; secondary outcomes were anxiety, purpose in life, positive affect, satisfaction with participation, goal management strategies, and arthritis self-efficacy. A linear mixed model procedure was applied to evaluate changes in outcomes. Results: No improvement was found for depressive symptoms and no changes were found for the secondary outcomes, except for positive affect that improved in the intervention group. This increase was mediated by an increase in goal adjustment. Furthermore, goal maintenance decreased and self-efficacy for other symptoms increased in the intervention group. Conclusion: This study indicates that interventions designed to aid patients with arthritis with goal management skills are potentially helpful for increasing positive affect, although further studies are needed.Implications for rehabilitation People with polyarthritis have to manage their disease in combination with possibly conflicting roles and personal goals, resulting in an ongoing process of finding equilibrium in a constantly changing situation. Based on a person-focused view, the program Right on Target focused on coping with threatened activities and life goals due to arthritis. The program consisted of six group-based meetings led by a trained nurse and a personal trajectory wherein participants were stimulated to try out various behavioral options related to an own threatened activity in concordance with their personal goals. The program seemed effective in increasing flexible goal adjustment and self-efficacy and participants experienced more positive affect directly after the program and at 6-month follow-up

A mixed-methods process evaluation of a goal management intervention for patients with polyarthritis

Process evaluations of newly developed interventions are necessary to identify effective and less effective intervention components. First aim of this study was to identify key components of a psychosocial goal management intervention from the perspective of participants, and second aim was to evaluate the intervention’s fidelity. A mixed-methods approach was applied to 24 interviews with participants post-intervention and 16 audio recordings of random training sessions. Participants experienced three key components: (1) the content, in which specific exercises helped to raise awareness and (intention to) change goal management behaviour, (2) person-focused approach, specifically, the nurse as trainer and personal fit of the approach, and (3) social mechanisms, including facilitating group processes and interpersonal processes. Adherence to the protocol by the trainers was high, while differences were found in the degree to which they were able to apply the intended collaborative approach and psychological communication skills. The applied design provided valuable insights into the processes that took place. Both the effects experienced by participants in relationship to the content, approach and social mechanisms as well as the strengths and weaknesses found with regard to fidelity provide insights that can inform the development and implementation of person-focused interventions

A mixed-methods process evaluation of a goal management intervention for patients with polyarthritis

Process evaluations of newly developed interventions are necessary to identify effective and less effective intervention components. First aim of this study was to identify key components of a psychosocial goal management intervention from the perspective of participants, and second aim was to evaluate the intervention’s fidelity. A mixed-methods approach was applied to 24 interviews with participants post-intervention and 16 audio recordings of random training sessions. Participants experienced three key components: (1) the content, in which specific exercises helped to raise awareness and (intention to) change goal management behaviour, (2) person-focused approach, specifically, the nurse as trainer and personal fit of the approach, and (3) social mechanisms, including facilitating group processes and interpersonal processes. Adherence to the protocol by the trainers was high, while differences were found in the degree to which they were able to apply the intended collaborative approach and psychological communication skills. The applied design provided valuable insights into the processes that took place. Both the effects experienced by participants in relationship to the content, approach and social mechanisms as well as the strengths and weaknesses found with regard to fidelity provide insights that can inform the development and implementation of person-focused interventions

The role of goal management for successful adaptation to arthritis

Objective: Persons with polyarthritis often experience difficulties in attaining personal goals due to disease symptoms such as pain, fatigue and reduced mobility. This study examines the relationship of goal management strategies – goal maintenance, goal adjustment, goal disengagement, goal reengagement – with indicators of adaptation to polyarthritis, namely, depression, anxiety, purpose in life, positive affect, participation, and work participation. Methods: 305 patients diagnosed with polyarthritis participated in a questionnaire study (62% female, 29% employed, mean age: 62 years). Hierarchical multiple-regression-analyses were conducted to examine the relative importance of the goal management strategies for adaptation. Self-efficacy in relation to goal management was also studied. Results: For all adaptation indicators, the goal management strategies added substantial explained variance to the models (R2: .07–.27). Goal maintenance and goal adjustment were significant predictors of adaptation to polyarthritis. Self-efficacy partly mediated the influence of goal management strategies. Conclusion: Goal management strategies were found to be important predictors of successful adaptation to polyarthritis. Overall, adjusting goals to personal ability and circumstances and striving for goals proved to be the most beneficial strategies. Practice implications: Designing interventions that focus on the effective management of goals may help people to adapt to polyarthritis