MSKI-RADS: An MRI-based Musculoskeletal Infection Reporting and Data System for the Diagnosis of Extremity Infections

Background Current terms used to describe the MRI findings for musculoskeletal infections are nonspecific and inconsistent. Purpose To develop and validate an MRI-based musculoskeletal infection classification and scoring system. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional internal validation study, a Musculoskeletal Infection Reporting and Data System (MSKI-RADS) was designed. Adult patients with radiographs and MRI scans of suspected extremity infections with a known reference standard obtained between June 2015 and May 2019 were included. The scoring categories were as follows: 0, incomplete imaging; I, negative for infection; II, superficial soft-tissue infection; III, deeper soft-tissue infection; IV, possible osteomyelitis (OM); V, highly suggestive of OM and/or septic arthritis; VI, known OM; and NOS (not otherwise specified), nonspecific bone lesions. Interreader agreement for 20 radiologists from 13 institutions (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and true-positive rates of MSKI-RADS were calculated and the accuracy of final diagnoses rendered by the readers was compared using generalized estimating equations for clustered data. Results Among paired radiographs and MRI scans from 208 patients (133 male, 75 female; mean age, 55 years ± 13 [SD]), 20 were category I; 34, II; 35, III; 30, IV; 35, V; 18, VI; and 36, NOS. Moderate interreader agreement was observed among the 20 readers (ICC, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.75). There was no evidence of correlation between reader experience and overall accuracy ( = .94). The highest true-positive rate was for MSKI-RADS I and NOS at 88.7% (95% CI: 84.6, 91.7). The true-positive rate was 73% (95% CI: 63, 80) for MSKI-RADS V. Overall reader accuracy using MSKI-RADS across all patients was 65% ± 5, higher than final reader diagnoses at 55% ± 7 ( < .001). Conclusion MSKI-RADS is a valid system for standardized terminology and recommended management of imaging findings of peripheral extremity infections across various musculoskeletal-fellowship-trained reader experience levels. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Schweitzer in this issue

MRI-based Neuropathy Score Reporting And Data System (NS-RADS): multi-institutional wider-experience usability study of peripheral neuropathy conditions among 32 radiology readers.

To determine the inter-reader reliability and diagnostic performance of classification and severity scales of Neuropathy Score Reporting And Data System (NS-RADS) among readers of differing experience levels after limited teaching of the scoring system. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, cross-sectional, retrospective study of MRI cases of proven peripheral neuropathy (PN) conditions. Thirty-two radiology readers with varying experience levels were recruited from different institutions. Each reader attended and received a structured presentation that described the NS-RADS classification system containing examples and reviewed published articles on this subject. The readers were then asked to perform NS-RADS scoring with recording of category, subcategory, and most likely diagnosis. Inter-reader agreements were evaluated by Conger's kappa and diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each reader as percent correct diagnosis. A linear mixed model was used to estimate and compare accuracy between trainees and attendings. Results: Across all readers, agreement was good for NS-RADS category and moderate for subcategory. Inter-reader agreement of trainees was comparable to attendings (0.65 vs 0.65). Reader accuracy for attendings was 75% (95% CI 73%, 77%), slightly higher than for trainees (71% (69%, 72%), p = 0.0006) for nerves and comparable for muscles (attendings, 87.5% (95% CI 86.1-88.8%) and trainees, 86.6% (95% CI 85.2-87.9%), p = 0.4). NS-RADS accuracy was also higher than average accuracy for the most plausible diagnosis for attending radiologists at 67% (95% CI 63%, 71%) and for trainees at 65% (95% CI 60%, 69%) (p = 0.036). Conclusion: Non-expert radiologists interpreted PN conditions with good accuracy and moderate-to-good inter-reader reliability using the NS-RADS scoring system