Hvilke ledelsesmæssige evner kan fremme skabelse af Capacity Building i organisationer?

Artiklen præsenterer et bud på, hvordan ledelse af Capacity Building kan skabes i praksis i etablerede organisationer. Først udarbejdes en syntese af eksisterende litteratur om ledelse af Capacity Building. Herefter undersøges et casestudie af projekt ’Sikkert Patienflow’ i sundhedsvæsenet, hvor casen anvendes til at udfolde, nuancere og tilskrive ny viden til litteraturen. Undersøgelsesspørgsmålet der besvares er ’Hvilke ledelsesmæssige evner kan fremme skabelse af Capacity Building i organisationer?’. Som en del af besvarelsen på spørgsmålet udvikles en teoretisk model (Figur 2) som illustrerer sammenhænge mellem det organisatoriske lederskab og det selv-lederskab, der skal være til stede i styringskæden på forskellige niveauer for at skabe de forandringer, der ønskes

En komparativ studie av den danske KO1539 og den svenske KO1571 med særlig henblikk på omtalen av dåpen, nattverden og skriftemålet

I denne oppgaven har jeg gjennom en komparativ lesning av Den danske kirkeordinans 1539 og Den svenska kyrkoordningen 1571 samt en dyptgående analyse av deres omtale av dåp, nattverd og skriftemål, forsøkt å finne forskjeller og likheter mellom dem, for så å komme med teorier som kan forklare disse. Jeg har også forsøkt å gi en fremstilling av reformasjonen i det danske og det svenske riket som helhet. Med fokus på de kongene og teologene som var med å påvirke prosessene som ledet frem til de to kirkeordningene, og som på hver sin måte har preget KO1539 og KO1571. På samme måte har jeg også gjort bruk av lutherske skrifter, og sett på dokumentene i en større Europeisk kontekst. Dette har jeg gjort gjennom å kontekstualisere disse dokumentene i lys av konfesjonaliseringen i Europa etter 1550. Ut fra dette mener jeg å finne argumenter for at de tydeligste forskjellene mellom KO1539 og KO1571 alle kan forklares utfra at den danske er skrevet før konfesjonaliseringen, mens den svenske er skrevet etter. Dette er også med på å nyansere synet på KO1539 og den danske reformasjonens lutherske konfesjonalitet, og på den andre siden løfte dette frem hos KO1571 og den svenske reformasjonen

The Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Bowel Resections:A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We aimed to determine the impact of small and large bowel resections on the risk of developing T2D in patients with IBD. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, prospective study of all IBD patients undergoing small bowel resection (Crohn’s disease [CD]) and large bowel resection (CD and ulcerative colitis [UC]) in Denmark (1996–2018). Each patient was matched with up to 5 patients with IBD and no history of bowel resection. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of T2D. RESULTS: We included 2469 patients with CD and small bowel resection, 1361 patients with CD and large bowel resection, and 3787 patients with UC and large bowel resection. Small bowel resection in CD patients was associated with lower risk of T2D (aHR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.44–0.92), compared with matched patients with CD and no bowel resection. Large bowel resection in patients with CD or UC was associated with aHRs of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.67–1.31) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.03–1.51), respectively, compared with matched patients with CD or UC and no bowel resection. CONCLUSION: Patients with CD and small bowel resection have a lower risk of T2D, whereas patients with UC and large bowel resection have a higher risk of T2D, compared with patients with IBD and no bowel resection history. The underlying mechanisms remain to be explored

Non-culture-based studies of the appendiceal microbiota:a systematic review

Aims: To review studies examining the appendiceal microbiota and microbial changes in acute appendicitis. Methods: After a systematic literature search, 11 studies examining the appendiceal microbiota (414 samples) using non-culture-based methods were included. Results: The appendiceal microbiota showed decreased α-diversity compared with fecal microbiota. Inflamed and uninflamed appendices showed differences in β-diversity, and there was an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria in inflamed versus uninflamed appendices. Conclusion: The appendiceal microbiota exhibits lower α-diversity than the fecal microbiota, with an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria. Compared with uninflamed appendices, the appendix microbiota in acute appendicitis also showed increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria, but no bacterial profile unique to either complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was found.</p

Non-culture-based studies of the appendiceal microbiota: a systematic review - Supplementary material FM

Aims: To review studies examining the appendiceal microbiota and microbial changes in acute appendicitis. Methods: After a systematic literature search, 11 studies examining the appendiceal microbiota (414 samples) using non-culture-based methods were included. Results: The appendiceal microbiota showed decreased α-diversity compared with fecal microbiota. Inflamed and uninflamed appendices showed differences in β-diversity, and there was an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria in inflamed versus uninflamed appendices. Conclusion: The appendiceal microbiota exhibits lower α-diversity than the fecal microbiota, with an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria. Compared with uninflamed appendices, the appendix microbiota in acute appendicitis also showed increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria, but no bacterial profile unique to either complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was found

Non-culture-based studies of the appendiceal microbiota: a systematic review - Table S1

Aims: To review studies examining the appendiceal microbiota and microbial changes in acute appendicitis. Methods: After a systematic literature search, 11 studies examining the appendiceal microbiota (414 samples) using non-culture-based methods were included. Results: The appendiceal microbiota showed decreased α-diversity compared with fecal microbiota. Inflamed and uninflamed appendices showed differences in β-diversity, and there was an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria in inflamed versus uninflamed appendices. Conclusion: The appendiceal microbiota exhibits lower α-diversity than the fecal microbiota, with an increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria. Compared with uninflamed appendices, the appendix microbiota in acute appendicitis also showed increased abundance of oral-associated bacteria, but no bacterial profile unique to either complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was found