37 research outputs found

    Consejos sobre la sequía: Recuperar los suelos salinos, sódicos y salino-sódicos

    Get PDF
    Los suelos afectados por la sal causan un crecimiento pobre en las plantas, dañan la producción de la cosecha y reducen la eficiencia en el uso del agua. Algunos suelos afectados por la sal presentan problemas físicos que reducen la filtración del agua e incrementan su escurrimiento en la superficie. La recuperación de los suelos afectados por la sal puede conducir a un mejor manejo del agua, un uso más eficiente del agua y la producción de los cultivos

    Soil-landscape model helps predict potassium supply in vineyards

    Full text link
    The Lodi Winegrape District is one of the largest in California and encompasses a wide diversity of wine-grape varieties, production systems and soils, which complicates grape nutrient management To identify regions within this district that have similar nutrient-management needs, we are developing a soil-landscape model based on soil survey information. Our current model identifies five regions within the Lodi district with presumed relationships between soil properties and potassium-supplying ability. Region 1 has weakly developed, clay-rich soils in basin alluvium; region 2 has weakly developed, coarser-textured soils on recent alluvial fans, flood plains and stream terraces; region 3 has moderately developed soils on low terraces derived from granitic alluvium; region 4 has highly developed soils on high terraces derived from mixed alluvium; and region 5 has weakly developed soils formed on undulating volcanic terrain. Field and lab studies of soils in these regions show that our model is reasonable in concept, but that it must be fine-tuned to account for differing degrees of soil variability within each region in order to make realistic nutrient-management predictions

    Fate of nitrate in seepage from a restored wetland receiving agricultural tailwater

    Full text link
    Constructed and restored wetlands are a common practice to filter agricultural runoff, which often contains high levels of pollutants, including nitrate. Seepage waters from wetlands have potential to contaminate groundwater. This study used soil and water monitoring and hydrologic and nitrogen mass balances to document the fate and transport of nitrate in seepage and surface waters from a restored flow-through wetland adjacent to the San Joaquin River, California. A 39% reduction in NO3-N concentration was observed between wetland surface water inflows (12.87±6.43mgL-1; mean±SD) and outflows (7.87±4.69mgL-1). Redox potentials were consistently below the nitrate reduction threshold (~250mV) at most sites throughout the irrigation season. In the upper 10cm of the main flowpath, denitrification potential (DNP) for soil incubations significantly increased from 151 to 2437mgNO3-Nm-2d-1 when nitrate was added, but showed no response to carbon additions indicating that denitrification was primarily limited by nitrate. Approximately 72% of the water entering the wetland became deep seepage, water that percolated beyond 1-m depth. The wetland was highly effective at removing nitrate (3866kgNO3-N) with an estimated 75% NO3-N removal efficiency calculated from a combined water and nitrate mass balance. The mass balance results were consistent with estimates of NO3-N removed (5085kgNO3-N) via denitrification potential. Results indicate that allowing seepage from wetlands does not necessarily pose an appreciable risk for groundwater nitrate contamination and seepage can facilitate greater nitrate removal via denitrification in soil compared to surface water transport alone

    Do constructed flow through wetlands improve water quality in the San Joaquin River?

    No full text
    The efficacy of using constructed wetlands (CW) to improve water quality of irrigation tailwaters was studied in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Two CWs were monitored during the 2004 and 2005 irrigation season, a new CW (W-1) and 12-year-old CW (W-2). Input/output waters from CW were collected weekly and analyzed for a variety of water quality contaminants. Organic carbon, nutrient and sediment retention efficiencies were evaluated from input/output concentrations. Results indicate that CW-2 was more a more efficient contaminant removal system for most water quality constituents. CWs were most effective at removing total suspended solids (TSS). Average TSS removal at CW-2 was 98% in 2004 and 83% in 2005. At CW-1, mean TSS removal was 90% in 2004 and 87% in 2005. Average total N removal efficiency was 41% in 2004 and 29% in 2005 for W-2, compared to 31% in 2004 and 21% in 2005 at W-1. Total P removal efficiency was 63% in 2004 and 24% in 2005 at W-2, compared to 27.5% in 2004 and 11% in 2005 at W-1. Chlorophyll-a, a measure of algal biomass, was higher at W-1, especially in input waters. Initially, in 2004, output concentration of chlorophyll- a increased, however over time, as emergent vegetation established, chlorophyll-a decreased to 35% of input levels. In 2005, CW-2 was a large source of algal biomass because vegetation was not present. Results demonstrate that CWs are effective at capturing sediment and nutrients from irrigation tailwaters, but may be a source of algae if not managed carefully

    Using Wetlands to Remove Microbial Pollutants from Farm Discharge Water

    No full text
    Besides growing crops, a farmer is an active steward of the natural resources that support those crops. Just a few acres of wetlands on the farm can easily filter ag water for many harmful microbes introduced through livestock- or crop-related use
    corecore