Efficacy of Oseltamivir-Zanamivir Combination Compared to Each Monotherapy for Seasonal Influenza: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Analysis of virological and clinical outcomes from a randomized trial that was terminated early suggest that combined treatment of seasonal influenza in adult outpatients with oseltamivir plus zanamivir is no more effective than either oseltamivir or zanamivir monotherapy

Les aspects pharmaceutiques des essais cliniques institutionnels AP-HP (présentation-création d'une base de données permettant le suivi d'une activité en pleine croissance)

PARIS-BIUP (751062107) / SudocSudocFranceF

Acquisition et validation d'un système d'information adapté à la logistique pharmaceutique des essais cliniques (exemple du logiciel Gexpec)

PARIS-BIUP (751062107) / SudocSudocFranceF

Academic pediatric clinical research: factors associated with study implementation duration

International audienceAbstractBackgroundThe ethical, methodological, and technical aspects of pediatric research, often results in complications and delays in implementation. Our objective was to identify factors associated with the implementation duration of hospital-based pediatric studies.MethodsAll hospital-based pediatric studies sponsored by AP-HP between 2002 and 2008 were retrospectively identified. Association of the funding mechanism and methodological factors with the implementation duration was assessed using a multivariable mixed linear model. Pharmaceutical factors were explored as part of a subgroup analysis restricted to the studies involving drug therapy. Given that we took an exploratory approach, factors associated with implementation duration with p < 0.10 were kept in the final models.ResultsA total of 139 studies were evaluated. The median implementation duration was 17.1 months (range: 0.9-55.3 months), and tended to increase over time (from 14.9 [25th percentile-75th percentile: 11.5-19.9] months in 2002 to 23.7 [15.2-31.0] months in 2008, p = 0.01). External (coefficient [95 % confidence interval]: -7.7 [-11.9;-3.5] months, p < 0.001) and internal funding (-5.3 95 % CI [-9.8;-0.8], p = 0.02) compared to governmental funding and number of centers (-0.1 95 % CI[-0.2;0.02] months for 1 center increase, p = 0.07) were associated with reduced duration, whereas interventional study (either involving drug therapy (6.0 95 % CI[0.7;11.3] months, p = 0.03 or not (3.5 95 % CI[-0.3;7.3] months, p = 0.06) was associated with increased duration compared to observational study. Regarding the 35 studies involving drug therapy, external funding decreased duration (-6.7 95 % CI[-13.2;-0.2] months, p = 0.05), whereas studies involving solely a pediatric population (7.8 95 % CI[1.1;14.5] months, p = 0.01) (compared to mixed adult-pediatric population), a placebo-controlled design (6.6 95 % CI[0.9;12.3] months, p = 0.01), and inappropriate drug formulation for at least one drug used in the study (6.9 95 % CI[-0.2;14.0] months, p = 0.06) were associated with increased duration.ConclusionImplementation of hospital-based pediatric studies primarily faced delays when they were interventional and, in particular, when they involved drug therapy. Regarding the latter, difficulties that resulted in delayed studies arose with respect to the supply of drugs and placebo in age-appropriate dosages and route of administration. Therefore, difficulties related to the use of pharmaceuticals need to be anticipated earlier in order to avoid implementation delays

How to Improve the Implementation of Academic Clinical Pediatric Trials Involving Drug Therapy? A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders

<div><p>Objective</p><p>The need for encouraging pediatric drug research is widely recognized. However, hospital-based clinical trials of drug treatments are extremely time-consuming, and delays in trial implementation are common. The objective of this qualitative study was to collect information on the perceptions and experience of health professionals involved in hospital-based pediatric drug trials.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Two independent researchers conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with principal investigators (n = 17), pharmacists (n = 7), sponsor representatives (n = 4), and drug regulatory agency representatives (n = 3) who participated in institutionally sponsored clinical trials of experimental drugs in pediatric patients between 2002 and 2008.</p><p>Results</p><p>Dissatisfaction was reported by 67% (16/24) of principal investigators and pharmacists: all 7 pharmacists felt they were involved too late in the trial implementation process, whereas 11 (65%) principal investigators complained of an excessive regulatory burden and felt they were insufficiently involved in the basic research questions. Both groups perceived clinical trial implementation as burdensome and time-consuming. The sponsor and regulatory agency representatives reported a number of difficulties but were not dissatisfied.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The heavy burden related to regulatory requirements, and suboptimal communication across disciplines involved, seem to be the main reasons for the major delays in pediatric drug trial implementation. The pharmaceutical aspects are intrinsically tied to trial methodology and implementation and must therefore be examined, in particular by involving Clinical Research Pharmacists at early stages of study conception.</p></div

CARSKIN: Pembrolizumab as first line therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

TPS9596 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic cSCCs. Cisplatin-based combinations have some efficacy but their toxicity often prohibits their use, particularly for the elderly. New therapeutic options are needed. Tumors divert the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) pathway suppressing immune control. Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is a high-affinity humanized monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody. It leads to dual PD-1 ligand (PD-L1 and PD-L2) blockade that may reactivate the immune surveillance and elicit anti-tumor response. It has antitumor activity in several tumors including head and neck SCCs. Moreover, an efficacy of pembrolizumab in cSCCs has been reported recently in a series of 6 cases. Methods: CARSKIN (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02883556) is a French multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in 39 pts with unresectable and/or metastatic cSCCs, naive of chemotherapy and of EGFR inhibitors. Pembrolizumab is administered (200 mg IV Q3W) for up to 24 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible pts must undergo a baseline biopsy of the tumor prior to treatment for PD-L1 evaluation. Response is to be assessed at baseline, wk 9, 15 and 24, and thereafter Q12W by central radiology review per RECIST 1.1 and per modified RECIST v1.1. The primary objective is response rate (RR) at wk 15 per RECIST 1.1. Secondary efficacy objectives are to assess whether patients with PD-L1+ tumors have a better RR than the whole sample at wk 15 and to assess in the whole sample and in PD-L1+ pts, disease control rate (DCR) at wk15, RR at wk 24, best RR, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), duration of response / control and time to disease progression. A Simon optimal two-stage design will be used. Four responders among 19 pts will be needed in the 1 st step to continue the trial. Overall 9 responses will be needed to conclude the effectiveness. Kaplan-Meier statistics will assess PFS and OS. Adverse events (AEs) will be assessed throughout the study and for 30 d thereafter (6 m for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Clinical trial information: NCT02883556