Sustaining The Saco Estuary: Final Report 2015

This study focuses on the Saco estuary, the tidal portion of the Saco River, which drains the largest watershed in southern Maine. With headwaters in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, the watershed encompasses more than 4,400 km2, and provides clean healthy drinking water to over 100,000 people living and working in communities in southern Maine. When the study began in 2009, very little was known about the ecology of the Saco estuary. Researchers at the University of New England and the Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve employed the process of collaborative learning to bring together people who care about the estuary in order to identify their concerns. A Stewardship Network composed of people employed by municipal, state and federal governments, water supply organizations and businesses, volunteers from municipal boards making land use decisions, land trusts, property owners and representatives from other organizations that are uniquely focused on the region was formed. The Stewardship Network helped to define the project goals and objectives, and provided input and guidance over the five-year project. This report explains what the researchers discovered about the ecology of the estuary, along with what they learned about its social and economic components. This baseline assessment contributes to the long-term goal of restoring and sustaining the structure and function of the estuary, and supports the efforts of government, businesses and local organizations that value the estuary and depend upon the natural services it provides

Assessing associations between the AURKAHMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

While interplay between BRCA1 and AURKA-RHAMM-TPX2-TUBG1 regulates mammary epithelial polarization, common genetic variation in HMMR (gene product RHAMM) may be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Following on these observations, we further assessed the link between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Forty-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers and subsequently analyzed using a retrospective likelihood appr

Constraints on dark matter to dark radiation conversion in the late universe with DES-Y1 and external data

84siWe study a class of decaying dark matter models as a possible resolution to the observed discrepancies between early- and late-time probes of the universe. This class of models, dubbed DDM, characterizes the evolution of comoving dark matter density with two extra parameters. We investigate how DDM affects key cosmological observables such as the CMB temperature and matter power spectra. Combining 3x2pt data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey,Planck-2018 CMB temperature and polarization data, Supernova (SN) Type Ia data from Pantheon, and BAO data from BOSS DR12, MGS and 6dFGS, we place new constraints on the amount of dark matter that has decayed and the rate with which it converts to dark radiation. The fraction of the decayed dark matter in units of the current amount of dark matter, $zeta$, is constrained at 68% confidence level to be <0.32 for DES-Y1 3x2pt data, <0.030 for CMB+SN+BAO data, and <0.037 for the combined dataset. The probability that the DES and CMB+SN+BAO datasets are concordant increases from 4% for the $Lambda$CDM model to 8% (less tension) for DDM. Moreover, tension in $S_8=sigma_8sqrt{Omega_m/0.3}$ between DES-Y1 3x2pt and CMB+SN+BAO is reduced from 2.3$sigma$ to 1.9$sigma$. We find no reduction in the Hubble tension when the combined data is compared to distance-ladder measurements in the DDM model. The maximum-posterior goodness-of-fit statistics of DDM and $Lambda$CDM are comparable, indicating no preference for the DDM cosmology over $Lambda$CDM....partially_openopenChen, Angela; Huterer, Dragan; Lee, Sujeong; Ferté, Agnès; Weaverdyck, Noah; Alonso Alves, Otavio; Leonard, C. Danielle; MacCrann, Niall; Raveri, Marco; Porredon, Anna; Di Valentino, Eleonora; Muir, Jessica; Lemos, Pablo; Liddle, Andrew; Blazek, Jonathan; Campos, Andresa; Cawthon, Ross; Choi, Ami; Dodelson, Scott; Elvin-Poole, Jack; Gruen, Daniel; Ross, Ashley; Secco, Lucas F.; Sevilla, Ignacio; Sheldon, Erin; Troxel, Michael A.; Zuntz, Joe; Abbott, Tim; Aguena, Michel; Allam, Sahar; Annis, James; Avila, Santiago; Bertin, Emmanuel; Bhargava, Sunayana; Bridle, Sarah; Brooks, David; Carnero Rosell, Aurelio; Carrasco Kind, Matias; Carretero, Jorge; Costanzi, Matteo; Crocce, Martin; da Costa, Luiz; Elidaiana da Silva Pereira, Maria; Davis, Tamara; Doel, Peter; Eifler, Tim; Ferrero, Ismael; Fosalba, Pablo; Frieman, Josh; Garcia-Bellido, Juan; Gaztanaga, Enrique; Gerdes, David; Gruendl, Robert; Gschwend, Julia; Gutierrez, Gaston; Hinton, Samuel; Hollowood, Devon L.; Honscheid, Klaus; Hoyle, Ben; James, David; Jarvis, Mike; Kuehn, Kyler; Lahav, Ofer; Maia, Marcio; Marshall, Jennifer; Menanteau, Felipe; Miquel, Ramon; Morgan, Robert; Palmese, Antonella; Paz-Chinchon, Francisco; Plazas Malagón, Andrés; Roodman, Aaron; Sanchez, Eusebio; Scarpine, Vic; Schubnell, Michael; Serrano, Santiago; Smith, Mathew; Suchyta, Eric; Tarle, Gregory; Thomas, Daniel; To, Chun-Hao; Varga, Tamas Norbert; Weller, Jochen; Wilkinson, ReeseChen, Angela; Huterer, Dragan; Lee, Sujeong; Ferté, Agnès; Weaverdyck, Noah; Alonso Alves, Otavio; Leonard, C. Danielle; Maccrann, Niall; Raveri, Marco; Porredon, Anna; Di Valentino, Eleonora; Muir, Jessica; Lemos, Pablo; Liddle, Andrew; Blazek, Jonathan; Campos, Andresa; Cawthon, Ross; Choi, Ami; Dodelson, Scott; Elvin-Poole, Jack; Gruen, Daniel; Ross, Ashley; Secco, Lucas F.; Sevilla, Ignacio; Sheldon, Erin; Troxel, Michael A.; Zuntz, Joe; Abbott, Tim; Aguena, Michel; Allam, Sahar; Annis, James; Avila, Santiago; Bertin, Emmanuel; Bhargava, Sunayana; Bridle, Sarah; Brooks, David; Carnero Rosell, Aurelio; Carrasco Kind, Matias; Carretero, Jorge; Costanzi, Matteo; Crocce, Martin; da Costa, Luiz; Elidaiana da Silva Pereira, Maria; Davis, Tamara; Doel, Peter; Eifler, Tim; Ferrero, Ismael; Fosalba, Pablo; Frieman, Josh; Garcia-Bellido, Juan; Gaztanaga, Enrique; Gerdes, David; Gruendl, Robert; Gschwend, Julia; Gutierrez, Gaston; Hinton, Samuel; Hollowood, Devon L.; Honscheid, Klaus; Hoyle, Ben; James, David; Jarvis, Mike; Kuehn, Kyler; Lahav, Ofer; Maia, Marcio; Marshall, Jennifer; Menanteau, Felipe; Miquel, Ramon; Morgan, Robert; Palmese, Antonella; Paz-Chinchon, Francisco; Plazas Malagón, Andrés; Roodman, Aaron; Sanchez, Eusebio; Scarpine, Vic; Schubnell, Michael; Serrano, Santiago; Smith, Mathew; Suchyta, Eric; Tarle, Gregory; Thomas, Daniel; Chun-Hao, To; Varga, Tamas Norbert; Weller, Jochen; Wilkinson, Rees

Genome-Wide Association Study in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk

BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer risks can be modified by common genetic variants. To identify further cancer risk-modifying loci, we performed a multi-stage GWAS of 11,705 BRCA1 carriers (of whom 5,920 were diagnosed with breast and 1,839 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer), with a further replication in an additional sample of 2,646 BRCA1 carriers. We identified a novel breast cancer risk modifier locus at 1q32 for BRCA1 carriers (rs2290854, P = 2.7×10-8, HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). In addition, we identified two novel ovarian cancer risk modifier loci: 17q21.31 (rs17631303, P = 1.4×10-8, HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38) and 4q32.3 (rs4691139, P = 3.4×10-8, HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.17-1.38). The 4q32.3 locus was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in the general population or BRCA2 carriers, suggesting a BRCA1-specific associat

An Expanded Evaluation of Protein Function Prediction Methods Shows an Improvement In Accuracy

Background: A major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Results: We conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions: The top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent

An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

Background: A major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Results: We conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions: The top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent. Keywords: Protein function prediction, Disease gene prioritizationpublishedVersio