STUDI KOMPARATIF BADAN EKSEKUTIF MAHASISWA TINGKAT UNIVERSITAS DAN FAKULTAS DALAM KONTEKS PENDIDIKAN POLITIK

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh permasalahan di UPI dalam hal kegiatan organisasi kemahasiswaan yaitu: a) Sikap apatis mahasiswa terhadap organisasi kemahasiswaan. b) Kurangnya partisipasi mahasiswa terhadap organisasi kemahasiswaan. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah a) Perbedaan-perbedaan seperti apa dalam hal pengelolaan manajemen organisasi antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. b) Perbedaan-perbedaan seperti apa dalam hal gaya kepemimpinan antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. c) Perbedaan-perbedaan seperti apa dalam hal aktifitas/kegiatan antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. d) Perbedaan-perbedaan seperti apa dalam hal tingkat relasi/hubungan dengan mahasiswa dan organisasi lain antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. e) Perbedaan-perbedaan seperti apa dalam hal hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. f) Perbedaan-perbedaan apa saja dalam hal upaya yang dilakukan untuk meningkatkan eksistensi antara Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas dan Fakultas dalam rangka Pendidikan Politik?. Grand theory dalam penelitian ini yaitu tentang organisasi yang dikemukakan oleh Bernard. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi komparatif. Dengan menggunakan metode ini penulis dapat membandingkan antara BEM REMA UPI dan Senat Mahasiswa FPIPS. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, studi literatur dan studi dokumentasi. Adapun lokasi penelitian di kampus UPI dan subjek penelitian yakni pengurus (inti) BEM REMA UPI dan Senat Mahasiswa FPIPS serta pembina kemahasiswaan di lingkungan UPI. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah a) Pengelolaan manajemen organisasi sangatlah diperlukan dalam sebuah organisasi khususnya organisasi kemahasiswaan yang ada di lingkungan UPI. b) Gaya kepemimpinan yang dilakukan organisasi kemahasiswaan di lingkungan UPI yaitu terbuka, open minded dan demokratis. c) Aktifitas/kegiatan yang dilakukan organisasi kemahasiswaan yaitu dengan melaksanakan program kerja yang sesuai dengan tugas dan fungsinya. d) Relasi/hubungan yang dilakukan yaitu dengan organisasi kemahasiswaan yang ada di UPI misalnya dengan Himpunan Mahasiswa (HIMA) Jurusan. e) Hambatan yang dihadapi organisasi kemahasiswaan yaitu kurangnya membagi waktu antara akdemik dan organisasi serta kurangnya pendidikan politik dalam organisasi kemahasiswaan yang ada di UPI. f) Upaya yang harus dilakukan yaitu dengan cara melakukan kegiatan-kegiatan yang bisa menampung aspirasi mahsiswa serta dengan melakukan koordinasi dengan organisasi kemahasiswaan yang ada di UPI. This study was begun by the appearance of UPI students’ organization activity problem, such as: a) students’ apathies attitude upon students’ organization, b) the lack of students’ participation on the organization. The problems are formulated as follows: a) What are the differences between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its organization management in Politics education? b) What are the differences between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its leadership style in politics education? c) What are the differences on activities between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its leadership style in politics education? d) What are the differences on students and other organization relation between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its leadership style in politics education? e) What are the differences on obstacles may be found between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its leadership style in politics education? f) What are the differences on existence improvement endeavor between Students Executive Board at University level and Faculty on its leadership style in politics education?. This study adopted a grand theory on organization made by Bernard. The writer used comparative study to show as qualitative study. Within this method, the writer is enabled to differ between BEM (Students Executive Board) REMA UPI and FPIPS Students Senate. Data collecting technique was conducted by means observation, interview, literature study and document analysis. This study was conducted in UPI with BEM REMA UPI’s main organizer, FPIPS Students Senate and UPI Students Guide as participants in this study. Findings of this study are: a) Organization management is badly needed in an organization especially the one provided in UPI, b) Leadership style in UPI organization is open minded and democratic, c) Students Organization activities are based on perfect fit working program within its job description and function, d) Conducted relation within UPI Students’ Organization, for instance, with department’s Students Association (HIMA). e) The students’ organization obstacle is the lack of time dividing between academic and organization and the lack of politic education in the organization. f) The efforts are making certain activities which cover students aspiration and conducting coordination with UPI students organizations

Conflict Resolution: Zakat Poverty Alleviation Solutions in West Java

Poverty is a problem faced by all nations, including Indonesia. Various kinds of policies have been made by the government to overcome this problem both in sectoral, monetary, fiscal, and other policies, but the policies have not been fully able to solve problems that occur in the field. The gap between theory and the field can be seen in the not yet implementing good zakat management. Conflict resolution to overcome this is necessary because Zakat is one of the important instruments in poverty alleviation. The more zakat that is collected and the more targeted it is in its distribution, the more it will be able to reduce existing poverty. Therefore, zakat has a crucial role in the growth of the economy and development. Seeing the fact that the potential for zakat has not been fully exploited in Indonesia, the government needs to make special policies to increase it. This research will discuss conflict resolution in terms of literature review to alleviate poverty in Indonesia, especially West Java