Acute neurological care in north-east Germany with telemedicine support (ANNOTeM): protocol of a multi-center, controlled, open-label, two-arm intervention study

Background: Both diagnosis and treatment of neurological emergencies require neurological expertise and are time-sensitive. The lack of fast neurological expertise in regions with underserved infrastructure poses a major barrier for state-of-the-art care of patients with acute neurological diseases and leads to disparity in provision of health care. The main purpose of ANNOTeM (acute neurological care in North East Germany with telemedicine support) is to establish effective and sustainable support structures for evidence based treatments for stroke and other neurological emergencies and to improve outcome for acute neurological diseases in these rural regions. Methods: A “hub-and-spoke” network structure was implemented connecting three academic neurological centres (“hubs”) and rural hospitals (“spokes”) caring for neurological emergencies. The network structure includes (1) the establishment of a 24/7 telemedicine consultation service, (2) the implementation of standardized operating procedures (SOPs) in the network hospitals, (3) a multiprofessional training scheme, and (4) a quality management program. Data from three major health insurance companies as well as data from the quality management program are being collected and evaluated. Primary outcome is the composite of first time of receiving paid outpatient nursing care, first time of receiving care in a nursing home, or death within 90 days after hospital admission. Discussion: Beyond stroke only few studies have assessed the effects of telemedically supported networks on diagnosis and outcome of neurological emergencies. ANNOTeM will provide information whether this approach leads to improved outcome. In addition, a health economic analysis will be performed. Study registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00013067, date of registration: November 16 th, 2017, URL: http://www.drks.de/DRKS0001306

Perfusions-CT und CT-Angiographie als Prädiktor des neurologischen Outcome nach intraarterieller Thrombolyse bei akuten ischämischen Schlaganfällen im anterioren Stromgebiet

In der akuten Schlaganfallbehandlung nehmen die endovaskulären Revaskularisationsverfahren, insbesondere die intraarterielle Thrombolyse, einen wachsenden Stellenwert ein. Grundlage dafür ist die zentrumsspezifische Sicherheit und Durchführbarkeit, wobei nach den Zertifizierungskriterien der Deutschen Schlaganfallgesellschaft die intraarterielle Thrombolyse nur in zertifizierten überregionalen Stroke Units erfolgen sollte. Weiterhin existieren nur wenige Selektionsparameter zur Abschätzung des Risikos der intrakraniellen Blutung als wichtigste Komplikation gegenüber dem potenziellen Benefit der Behandlung. Ziel dieser Arbeit war 1. die Etablierung eines klinisch praktikablen Protokolls zur Entscheidung für eine intravenöse oder intraarterielle Thrombolyse sowie die systematische Untersuchung der zentrumsspezifischen Sicherheit und Durchführkeit der intraarteriellen Thrombolyse; 2. die Untersuchung des Einflusses der bekannten klinischen und radiologischen Faktoren, wie Zeit bis zur Thrombolyse oder Rekanalisation im vorliegenden Patientenkollektiv auf das neurologische Outcome; und 3. die Untersuchung der Perfusions-CT und der CT-Angiographie als Grundlage für weitere mögliche Selektionsparameter zur intraarteriellen Thrombolyse. Zwischen 02/2006 und 12/2008 konnten 26 Patienten eingeschlossen werden. Ein Patient verstarb innerhalb von 90 Tagen nach Schlaganfall aufgrund eines erneuten cerebrovaskulären Ereignisses. Die Rate der symptomatischen und asymptomatischen intrakraniellen Blutungen (8% bzw 8%) sowie die Rate der periprozeduralen Komplikationen sind trotz der eingeschränkten Vergleichbarkeit mit der Literatur als gleichwertig zu bewerten. Die Effektivitätsparameter Zeit bis Thombolyse (Durchschnitt +/- Standardabweichung: 4,03 ± 1,2), Rekanalisationsrate (73%) sowie das Ausmaß des guten funktionellen Outcome 90 Tage nach Schlaganfall (mRS <=2; 58%) sind ähnlich oder teilweise sogar besser als die in der Literatur veröffentlichen Ergebnisse für die intraarterielle und intravenöse Thrombolyse. Somit ist die intraarterielle Thrombolyse in dieser Studie als sicher und effektiv zu bewerten. Die Zeit bis zur Thrombolyse zeigte sich nicht signifikant mit dem neurologischen Outcome assoziiert, jedoch ergab sich ein Trend zu schlechterem Outcome mit größerer zeitlicher Latenz zwischen Symptom- und Therapiebeginn. Weiterhin konnte die Rekanalisaton als Prädiktor für das neurologische Outcome und die Infarktgröße bestätigt werden. Der prädiktive Wert des Ausmaßes der Kollateralen in der CT-Angiographie mittels eines von Tan et al. entwickelten Score für das finale Infarktvolumen konnte in diesem homogenen, hochselektionieren Patientengut bestätigt werden. Das Ausmaß der Kollateralen als ein neuer Selektionsparameter für die Thrombolyse sollte weiter detailiert untersucht werden. Weiterhin konnte nachgewiesen werden, dass mittels Perfusions-CT auf das kurzfristige Outcome mittels NIHSS zwischen Aufnahme und Entlassung geschlossen werden kann. Hierbei zeigte sich, dass der im Rahmen dieser Studie entwickelte Auswertealgorithmus der relativen Perfusions-CT-Parameter und der schon verwendete Algorithmus der ASPECTS-Perfusion, bezüglich der Vorhersagekraft des cerebralen Blutvolumens (CBV) gleichwertig sind, jedoch die relativen Perfusions-Parameter eine wesentliche bessere Interrater-Reliabiltät aufweisen. Bezüglich des cerebralen Blutflusses (CBF) ergab sich nach dem ASPECTS-Perfusions-Algorithmus keine Assoziation mit dem neurologischen Outcome. Bei den relativen Perfusionsparametern erreichte jedoch das CBF eine dem CBV vergleichbare Vorhersagefähigkeit gepaart mit einer besseren Interrater-Reliabilität als das CBV. Das aktuell weit verbreitete visuelle Abschätzen der Größe des tissue at risk zeigte weder eine Assoziation zum neurologischen Outcome nach intraarterieller Thrombolyse noch eine gute Interratervariabilität.In the acute treatment of stroke endovascular revascularization procedures in particular intra-arterial thrombolysis are of increasing importance. This is based on the center -specific safety and feasibility. Furthermore, there are only a few selection parameters to assess the risk of intracranial hemorrhage as the main complication compared to the potential benefit of treatment. The aim of this work was firstly the establishment of a clinically feasible protocol for decision-making for intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis , and the systematic study of the center -specific safety and feasibility of intra-arterial thrombolysis; secondly to study the influence of the known clinical and radiological factors, such as time to thrombolysis or recanalization on neurological outcome ; third to study the role of CT perfusion and CT angiography for further possible selection parameters for intra- arterial thrombolysis. Between 02 /2006 and 12/2008 26 patients were included. One patient died within 90 days after stroke due to a new cerebrovascular event. The rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (8 % and 8 %) and the rate of periprocedural complications are despite the limited comparability equivalent with the literature. Efficacy parameters as time to thrombolysis (mean + / - standard deviation: 4.03 ± 1.2), recanalization rate (73 %) and the extent of good functional outcome 90 days after stroke onset (mRS < = 2, 58 %) are similar or partially even better than the results published in the literature for intra-arterial and intravenous thrombolysis. Thus intra-arterial thrombolysis in this study should be regarded as safe and effective. Time to thrombolysis was not significantly associated with neurologic outcome, but there was a trend towards worse outcome with greater temporal latency between symptom and initiation of therapy. Furthermore, recanalisaton was confirmed as a predictor of neurological outcome and infarct size. The predictive value of the extent of collateral vessels in CT angiography using a score from Tan et al. for the final infarct volume was confirmed in this homogeneous, highly selected patient cohort. The extent of collaterals as a new parameter selection for thrombolysis should be further investigated in larger trials. Furthermore it could be shown that is a predictive value of perfusion CT parameters for short term outcome between admission and discharge assessed by NIHSS. The results demonstrated that the new algorithm of relative perfusion CT parameters and the algorithm of ASPECTS perfusion which has already been used in the literature, are equivalent with respect to the predictive power of the cerebral blood volume (CBV), but relative perfusion parameters showed a significant better interrater reliability. There was no association of cerebral blood flow (CBF) according to ASPECTS algorithm with neurological outcome. However, CBF according to relative perfusion parameters showed a similar predictive ability as CBV and in addition a better interrater reliability than CBV. The current widely used visual estimation of the tissue at risk showed neither an association with neurological outcome after intra-arterial thrombolysis nor a good interrater reliability

Reliability of a telephone interview for the classification of headache disorders

Objective: The study aimed to test the reliability of a semi-structured telephone interview for the classification of headache disorders according to the ICHD-3. Background: Questionnaire-based screening tools are often optimized for single primary headache diagnoses [e.g., migraine (MIG) and tension headache (TTH)] and therefore insufficiently represent the diagnostic precision of the ICHD-3, which limits epidemiological research of rare headache disorders. Brief semi-structured telephone interviews could be an effective alternative to improve classification. Methods: A patient population representative of different primary and secondary headache disorders (n = 60) was recruited from the outpatient clinic (HSA) of a tertiary care headache center. These patients completed an established population-based questionnaire for the classification of MIG, TTH, or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (TAC). In addition, they received a semi-structured telephone interview call from three blinded headache specialists individually. The agreement of diagnoses made either using the questionnaires or interviews with the HSA diagnoses was evaluated. Results: Of the 59 patients (n = 1 dropout), 24% had a second-order and 5% had a third-order headache disorder. The main diagnoses were as follows: frequent primary headaches with 61% MIG, 10% TAC, 9% TTH, and 5% rare primary and 16% secondary headaches. Second-order diagnosis was chronic migraine throughout, and third-order diagnoses were medication overuse headache and TTH. Agreement between main headaches from the HSA was significantly better for the telephone interview than for the questionnaire (questionnaire: κ = 0.330; interview: κ = 0.822; p < 0.001). Second-order diagnoses were not adequately captured by questionnaires, while there was a trend for good agreement with the telephone interview (κ = 0.433; p = 0.074). Headache frequency and psychiatric comorbidities were independent predictors of HSA and telephone interview agreement. Male sex, headache frequency, severity, and depressive disorders were independently predictive for agreement between the questionnaire and HSA. The telephone interview showed high sensitivity (≥71%) and specificity (≥92%) for all primary headache disorders, whereas the questionnaire was below 50% in either sensitivity or specificity. Conclusion: The semi-structured telephone interview appears to be a more reliable tool for accurate diagnosis of headache disorders than self-report questionnaires. This offers the potential to improve epidemiological headache research and care even in underserved areas

Translation and validation of an extended German version of ID MigraineTM as a migraine screening tool

Abstract Background and purpose:Diagnosing a patient with headache as a migraineur is critical for state-of-the-art migrainemanagement. Screening tools are imperative means to improve the diagnostic yield in the primary care settings andspecialized clinics. This study aims to translate and assess the diagnostic accuracy of a German version of theID Migraine™as a widely used and efficient screening instrument. Methods: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy translation methodology was used to translate theoriginal three-itemID Migraine™, including a fourth question for aura, from the English language into the German language.Diagnostic accuracy of the GermanID Migraine™and predictors of false screening results were assessed among patientspresenting to a headache outpatient clinic of a tertiary care center in Germany over a 6-month period. Results: The translation procedure yielded a harmonized GermanID Migraine™and its diagnostic accuracy was assessedin 105 patients (80 female, 46.5+17.2 years of age), including 79 patients (75.2%) with migraine. The three-item GermanID Migraine™provides a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 68%, and positive and negative predictive values of 90% and 95%,respectively, using a cutoff of� 2. Positive and negative predictive values in a general headache population are estimated tobe 74% and 98%, respectively. The aura question identified 18 out of 20 migraineurs with aura. Conclusions: The GermanID Migraine™is an accurate screening tool for migraine even in a challenging population of aspecialized outpatient clinic. Its diagnostic accuracy indicates a potential utility for screening in primary health care

Preventive treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies restores brain stem habituation deficits and excitability to painful stimuli in migraine: results from a prospective case-control study

Background &amp;amp; objectives!#!Calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand/receptor (CGRP) antibodies effectively reduce headache frequency in migraine. It is understood that they act peripherally, which raises the question whether treatment merely interferes with the last stage of headache generation or, alternatively, causes secondary adaptations in the central nervous system and might thus possess disease modifying potential. This study addresses this question by investigating the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR), which is closely tied to central disease activity, before and after treatment with CGRP antibodies.!##!Methods!#!We enrolled 22 patients suffering episodic migraine (21 female, 46.2 ± 13.8 years of age) and 22 age-/gender-matched controls. Patients received assessments of the nBR (R2 component, 10 trials, 6 stimuli/trial) before (V0) and three months (V3) after treatment with CGRP antibodies started, controls were assessed once. The R2 area (R2a) and habituation (R2h; gradient of R2a against stimulus order) of the stimulated/non-stimulated side (_s/_ns) following repeated supraorbital stimulation provide a direct readout of brainstem excitability and habituation as key mechanisms in migraine.!##!Results!#!All patients showed a substantial reduction of headache days/month (V0: 12.4±3.3, V3: 6.6 ± 4.9). R2a_s (F!##!Discussion!#!We provide evidence that three months of treatment with CGRP antibodies restores brain stem responses to painful stimuli and thus might be considered disease modifying. The nociceptive blink reflex may provide a biomarker to monitor central disease activity. Future studies should evaluate the blink reflex as a clinical biomarker to predict treatment response at baseline and to establish the risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation.!##!Trial registration!#!This trial was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04019496, date of registration: July 15, 2019)

Treatment Realities of Headache Disorders in Rural Germany by the Example of the Region of Western Pomerania

(1) Background: Headache disorders are among the most disabling medical conditions but the supply with experienced providers is outpaced by the demand for service. It is unclear to what extent particularly patients in rural regions are affected by limited access to comprehensive care. Furthermore, it is unknown what role general practitioners (GPs) play in headache care. (2) Methods: First-time consultations to a specialised headache clinic at a tertiary care centre were asked to participate. Their socio-demographic background, general and headache-specific medical history, disability and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Additionally, 176 GPs in neighbouring districts were contacted regarding headache management. (3) Results: We assessed 162 patients with first-time consultations (age 46.1 ± 17.0 years, 78.1% female), who suffered from migraine (72%), tension type, cluster and secondary headaches (each 5–10%). About 50% of patients received a new headache-diagnosis and 60% had treatment inconsistent with national guidelines. QoL was significantly worse in all domains compared to the general population. About 75% of GPs see headache patients at least several times per week, and mostly treat them by themself. (4) Conclusions: More than every second headache patient was neither correctly diagnosed nor received guideline adherent treatment. Headache-related disability is inferior to what is expected from previous studies. Access to specialised health care is more limited in rural than in urban regions in Germany and GPs request more training

Stroke Admissions, Stroke Severity, and Treatment Rates in Urban and Rural Areas During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Many regions worldwide reported a decline of stroke admissions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It remains unclear whether urban and rural regions experienced similar declines and whether deviations from historical admission numbers were more pronounced among specific age, stroke severity or treatment groups. Methods: We used registry datasets from (a) nine acute stroke hospitals in Berlin, and (b) nine hospitals from a rural TeleNeurology network in Northeastern Germany for primary analysis of 3-week-rolling average of stroke/TIA admissions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared course of stroke admission numbers with regional cumulative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-CoV-2) infections. In secondary analyses, we used emergency department logs of the Berlin Charité University hospital to investigate changes in age, stroke severity, and thrombolysis/thrombectomy frequencies during the early regional Sars-CoV-2 spread (March and April 2020) and compared them with preceding years. Results: Compared to past years, stroke admissions decreased by 20% in urban and 20-25% in rural hospitals. Deviations from historical averages were observable starting in early March and peaked when numbers of regional Sars-CoV-2 infections were still low. At the same time, average admission stroke severity and proportions of moderate/severe strokes (NIHSS >5) were 20 and 20–40% higher, respectively. There were no relevant deviations observed in proportions of younger patients (<65 years), proportions of patients with thrombolysis, or number of thrombectomy procedures. Stroke admissions at Charité subsequently rebounded and reached near-normal levels after 4 weeks when the number of new Sars-CoV-2 infections started to decrease. Conclusions: During the early pandemic, deviations of stroke-related admissions from historical averages were observed in both urban and rural regions of Northeastern Germany and appear to have been mainly driven by avoidance of admissions of mildly affected stroke patients

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on stroke teleconsultations in Germany in the first half of 2020

Background and purpose The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on telemedical care have not been described on a national level. Thus, we investigated the medical stroke treatment situation before, during, and after the first lockdown in Germany. Methods In this nationwide, multicenter study, data from 14 telemedical networks including 31 network centers and 155 spoke hospitals covering large parts of Germany were analyzed regarding patients' characteristics, stroke type/severity, and acute stroke treatment. A survey focusing on potential shortcomings of in-hospital and (telemedical) stroke care during the pandemic was conducted. Results Between January 2018 and June 2020, 67,033 telemedical consultations and 38,895 telemedical stroke consultations were conducted. A significant decline of telemedical (p < 0.001) and telemedical stroke consultations (p < 0.001) during the lockdown in March/April 2020 and a reciprocal increase after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in May/June 2020 were observed. Compared to 2018–2019, neither stroke patients' age (p = 0.38), gender (p = 0.44), nor severity of ischemic stroke (p = 0.32) differed in March/April 2020. Whereas the proportion of ischemic stroke patients for whom endovascular treatment (14.3% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.85) was recommended remained stable, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower proportion of recommendation of intravenous thrombolysis during the lockdown (19.0% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.052). Despite the majority of participating network centers treating patients with COVID-19, there were no relevant shortcomings reported regarding in-hospital stroke treatment or telemedical stroke care. Conclusions Telemedical stroke care in Germany was able to provide full service despite the COVID-19 pandemic, but telemedical consultations declined abruptly during the lockdown period and normalized after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in Germany