Phages and HIV-1: From Display to Interplay

The complex hide-and-seek game between HIV-1 and the host immune system has impaired the development of an efficient vaccine. In addition, the high variability of the virus impedes the long-term control of viral replication by small antiviral drugs. For more than 20 years, phage display technology has been intensively used in the field of HIV-1 to explore the epitope landscape recognized by monoclonal and polyclonal HIV-1-specific antibodies, thereby providing precious data about immunodominant and neutralizing epitopes. In parallel, biopanning experiments with various combinatorial or antibody fragment libraries were conducted on viral targets as well as host receptors to identify HIV-1 inhibitors. Besides these applications, phage display technology has been applied to characterize the enzymatic specificity of the HIV-1 protease. Phage particles also represent valuable alternative carriers displaying various HIV-1 antigens to the immune system and eliciting antiviral responses. This review presents and summarizes the different studies conducted with regard to the nature of phage libraries, target display mode and biopanning procedures

L'étude du récepteur ACKR3/CXCR7 dans le glioblastome

After validation of ACKR3 staining by using U87-ACKR3 cell line, we showed that ACKR3 expression was very low in patients GBM stem-like cells. However we detect the receptor on GBM patient tissue, where it appears distributed in various cell subtypes. Both public transcriptomic datasets of GBM and results that we have obtained have revealed that ACKR3 is expressed in tumor cells in situ, but also in cells from the surrounding tumor microenvironment. Morever, ACKR3 expression pattern varies in different regions of a tumor, and between different patients. The role of ACKR3 in GBM growth might be more subtle than expected, and likely involves malignant GBM cells as well as their microenvironment. The role of CXCR4 together with ACKR3 also deserves deep investigation

GPR182 is a broadly scavenging atypical chemokine receptor influencing T-independent immunity.

Immune responses highly depend on the effective trafficking of immune cells into and within secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs). Atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) scavenge chemokines to eliminate them from the extracellular space, thereby generating gradients that guide leukocytes. In contrast to canonical chemokine receptors, ACKRs do not induce classical intracellular signaling that results in cell migration. Recently, the closest relative of ACKR3, GPR182, has been partially deorphanized as a potential novel ACKR. We confirm and extend previous studies by identifying further ligands that classify GPR182 as a broadly scavenging chemokine receptor. We validate the "atypical" nature of the receptor, wherein canonical G-protein-dependent intracellular signaling is not activated following ligand stimulation. However, β-arrestins are required for ligand-independent internalization and chemokine scavenging whereas the C-terminus is in part dispensable. In the absence of GPR182 in vivo, we observed elevated chemokine levels in the serum but also in SLO interstitium. We also reveal that CXCL13 and CCL28, which do not bind any other ACKR, are bound and efficiently scavenged by GPR182. Moreover, we found a cooperative relationship between GPR182 and ACKR3 in regulating serum CXCL12 levels, and between GPR182 and ACKR4 in controlling CCL20 levels. Furthermore, we unveil a new phenotype in GPR182-KO mice, in which we observed a reduced marginal zone (MZ), both in size and in cellularity, and thus in the T-independent antibody response. Taken together, we and others have unveiled a novel, broadly scavenging chemokine receptor, which we propose should be named ACKR5

Patient-Oriented Perspective on Chemokine Receptor Expression and Function in Glioma.

peer reviewedGliomas are severe brain malignancies, with glioblastoma (GBM) being the most aggressive one. Despite continuous efforts for improvement of existing therapies, overall survival remains poor. Over the last years, the implication of chemokines and their receptors in GBM development and progression has become more evident. Recently, large amounts of clinical data have been made available, prompting us to investigate chemokine receptors in GBM from a still-unexplored patient-oriented perspective. This study aims to highlight and discuss the involvement of chemokine receptors-CCR1, CCR5, CCR6, CCR10, CX3CR1, CXCR2, CXCR4, ACKR1, ACKR2, and ACKR3-most abundantly expressed in glioma patients based on the analysis of publicly available clinical datasets. Given the strong intratumoral heterogeneity characterizing gliomas and especially GBM, receptor expression was investigated by glioma molecular groups, by brain region distribution, emphasizing tissue-specific receptor functions, and by cell type enrichment. Our study constitutes a clinically relevant and patient-oriented guide that recapitulates the expression profile and the complex roles of chemokine receptors within the highly diversified glioma landscape. Additionally, it strengthens the importance of patient-derived material for development and precise amelioration of chemokine receptor-targeting therapies

The ADORA1 mutation linked to early-onset Parkinson's disease alters adenosine A1-A2A receptor heteromer formation and function

Adenosine modulates neurotransmission through inhibitory adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) and stimulatory A2A receptors (A2ARs). These G protein-coupled receptors are involved in motor function and related to neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD). An autosomal-recessive mutation (G2797.44S) within the transmembrane helix (TM) 7 of A1R (A1RG279S) has been associated with the development of early onset PD (EOPD). Here, we aimed at investigating the impact of this mutation on the structure and function of the A1R and the A1R-A2AR heteromer. Our results revealed that the G2797.44S mutation does not alter A1R expression, ligand binding, constitutive activity or coupling to transducer proteins (Gαi, Gαq, Gα12/13, Gαs, β-arrestin2 and GRK2) in transfected HEK-293 T cells. However, A1RG279S weakened the ability of A1R to heteromerize with A2AR, as shown in a NanoBiT assay, which led to the disappearance of the heteromerization-dependent negative allosteric modulation that A1R imposes on the constitutive activity and agonist-induced activation of the A2AR. Molecular dynamic simulations allowed to propose an indirect mechanism by which the G2797.44S mutation in TM 7 of A1R weakens the TM 5/6 interface of the A1R-A2AR heteromer. Therefore, it is demonstrated that a PD linked ADORA1 mutation is associated with dysfunction of adenosine receptor heteromerization. We postulate that a hyperglutamatergic state secondary to increased constitutive activity and sensitivity to adenosine of A2AR not forming heteromers with A1R could represent a main pathogenetic mechanism of the EOPD associated with the G2797.44S ADORA1 mutation

Predominance of the heterozygous CCR5 delta‐24 deletion in African individuals resistant to HIV infection might be related to a defect in CCR5 addressing at the cell surface

Introduction The chemokine receptor CCR5 is the main co-receptor for R5-tropic HIV-1 variants. We have previously described a novel 24-base pair deletion in the coding region of CCR5 among individuals from Rwanda. Here, we investigated the prevalence of hCCR5 Delta 24 in different cohorts and its impact on CCR5 expression and HIV-1 infection in vitro. Methods We screened hCCR5 Delta 24 in a total of 3232 individuals which were either HIV-1 uninfected, high-risk HIV-1 seronegative and seropositive partners from serodiscordant couples, Long-Term Survivors, or HIV-1 infected volunteers from Africa (Rwanda, Kenya, Guinea-Conakry) and Luxembourg, using a real-time PCR assay. The role of the 24-base pair deletion on CCR5 expression and HIV infection was assessed in cell lines and PBMC using mRNA quantification, confocal analysis, flow and imaging cytometry. Results and Discussion Among the 1661 patients from Rwanda, 12 individuals were heterozygous for hCCR5 Delta 24 but none were homozygous. Although heterozygosity for this allele may not confer complete resistance to HIV-1 infection, the prevalence of the mutation was 2.41% (95%CI: 0.43; 8.37) in 83 Long-Term Survivors (LTS) and 0.99% (95%CI: 0.45; 2.14) in 613 HIV-1 exposed seronegative members as compared with 0.35% (95% Cl: 0.06; 1.25) in 579 HIV-1 seropositive members. The prevalence of hCCR5 Delta 24 was 0.55% (95%CI: 0.15; 1.69) in 547 infants from Kenya but the mutation was not detected in 224 infants from Guinea-Conakry nor in 800 Caucasian individuals from Luxembourg. Expression of hCCR5 Delta 24 in cell lines and PBMC showed that the hCCR5 Delta 24 protein is stably expressed but is not transported to the plasma membrane due to a conformational change. Instead, the mutant receptor was retained intracellularly, colocalized with an endoplasmic reticulum marker and did not mediate HIV-1 infection. Co-transfection of hCCR5 Delta 24 and wtCCR5 did not indicate a transdominant negative effect of CCR5 Delta 24 on wtCCR5. Conclusions Our findings indicate that hCCR5 Delta 24 is not expressed at the cell surface. This could explain the higher prevalence of the heterozygous hCCR5 Delta 24 in LTS and HIV-1 exposed seronegative members from serodiscordant couples. Our data suggest an East-African localization of this deletion, which needs to be confirmed in larger cohorts from African and non-African countries

Nanoluciferase-based cell fusion assay for rapid and high-throughput assessment of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies in patient samples.

After more than two years, COVID-19 still represents a global health burden of unprecedented extent and assessing the degree of immunity of individuals against SARS-CoV-2 remains a challenge. Virus neutralization assays represent the gold standard for assessing antibody-mediated protection against SARS-CoV-2 in sera from recovered and/or vaccinated individuals. Neutralizing antibodies block the interaction of viral spike protein with human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in vitro and prevent viral entry into host cells. Classical viral neutralization assays using full replication-competent viruses are restricted to specific biosafety level 3-certified laboratories, limiting their utility for routine and large-scale applications. We developed therefore a cell-fusion-based assay building on the interaction between viral spike and ACE2 receptor expressed on two different cell lines, substantially reducing biosafety risks associated with classical viral neutralization assays. This chapter describes this simple, sensitive, safe and cost-effective approach for rapid and high-throughput evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies relying on high-affinity NanoLuc® luciferase complementation technology (HiBiT). When applied to a variety of standards and patient samples, this method yields highly reproducible results in 96-well, as well as in 384-well format. The use of novel NanoLuc® substrates with increased signal stability like Nano-Glo® Endurazine™ furthermore allows for high flexibility in assay set-up and full automatization of all reading processes. Lastly, the assay is suitable to evaluate the neutralizing capacity of sera against the existing spike variants, and potentially variants that will emerge in the future

GPR101 drives growth hormone hypersecretion and gigantism in mice via constitutive activation of Gs and Gq/11

peer reviewedGrowth hormone (GH) is a key modulator of growth and GH over-secretion can lead to gigantism. One form is X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG), in which infants develop GH-secreting pituitary tumors over-expressing the orphan G-protein coupled receptor, GPR101. The role of GPR101 in GH secretion remains obscure. We studied GPR101 signaling pathways and their effects in HEK293 and rat pituitary GH3 cell lines, human tumors and in transgenic mice with elevated somatotrope Gpr101 expression driven by the rat Ghrhr promoter (GhrhrGpr101). Here, we report that Gpr101 causes elevated GH/prolactin secretion in transgenic GhrhrGpr101 mice but without hyperplasia/tumorigenesis. We show that GPR101 constitutively activates not only Gs, but also Gq/11 and G12/13, which leads to GH secretion but not proliferation. These signatures of GPR101 signaling, notably PKC activation, are also present in human pituitary tumors with high GPR101 expression. These results underline a role for GPR101 in the regulation of somatotrope axis function.GOLIATH