COACHING ADVICE THAT REDUCES LOADS ASSOCIATED WITH BIOMECHANICAL PREDICTORS OF ILIOTIBIAL BAND SYNDROME

It has been previously described that the normalized hip adduction moment correlates significantly with the risk of developing iliotibial band syndrome. To advance this research we developed coaching advice that would result in reducing the peak hip adduction moment. Five marathon runners were assessed to determine their normal kinematic and kinetics while running. Runners were then coached to run their normal speed but while lowering their upper bodies by ~1 inch (2.54cm). The runners reduced their peak adduction moments by 21.8% (

THE LATERAL REACTION STEP IN TENNIS FOOTWORK

Anecdotal evidence suggests that the key to quickness in tennis is the "reaction step", or the first step in response to the ball. There are three possible lateral reaction steps towards a wide and difficult shot: 1) step first with the outside foot towards the ball (jab step); 2) pivot on the outside foot while turning the hips towards the ball (pivot step); 3) bring the outside foot towards the body away from the ball, allowing gravity to assist the motion (drop step or gravity step). A controlled study of 10 participants showed that when a player used the gravity step to reach a lateral shot requiring a quick response, the player was 52% more likely to reach the ball (p < 0.05) and 100% more likely to control the return shot (p < 0.05) when compared to the jab step. A simple experiment utilizing a 9-marker motion analysis system provided further evidence to support these findings

BENEFICIAL KINETIC ADAPTATIONS AFTER ENDURANCE TRAINING

Endurance training produces adaptations in running kinetics, although it does not produce changes in kinematics. We performed a prospective study of 23 runners who joined established marathon training teams. Each was tested in their first month of training and again two weeks prior to their marathon. The approximate time between tests was three months. Four peak ground reaction forces were reduced significantly after the training: lateral (15.4%), acceleration (7.10%), vertical (2.1%) and the normalized resultant (2.1%). Kinetic variables associated with iliotibial band injuries and anterior knee pain also had significant reductions. Peak hip adduction moments were reduced by 6.0%, peak patellofemoral contact force was reduced by 7.6%

INJURY INCIDENCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND SEVERITY DURING A MARATHON TRAINING SEASON AND THE IMPLICATIONS

Marathon runners and their coaches are concerned about the potential for injury during an individual season. No published studies of running injuries address this training season as a meaningful entity. This study reports the incidence of injury and the distribution of injuries for runners (n=75) on two established marathon training teams during an individual season. An injury was defined as affecting seven consecutive days or three consecutive workouts. The incidence/risks of overuse injuries, for marathon runners in a single season were found to be: anterior knee pain (20%), iliotibial band syndrome (29%), plantar fasciitis (1%), Achilles tendonitis (9%) shin splints (16%) and stress fractures (4%). This risk, overall injury distribution, severity and length of longest run prior to presentation of injury are of interest to runners, coaches and biomechanists

The Regional Sensitivity of Chondrocyte Gene Expression to Coactive Mechanical Load and Exogenous TNF-a Stimuli

Both mechanical load and elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines have been associated with the risk for developing osteoarthritis (OA), yet the potential interaction of these mechanical and biological factors is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of chondrocytes to the effects of dynamic unconfined compression, TNF-a, and the simultaneous effects of dynamic unconfined compression and TNF-a. The response to these three treatments was markedly different and, taken together, the response in the gene expression of chondrocytes to the different treatment conditions suggest a complex interaction between structure, biology, and mechanical loading

No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a broad range of total knee prostheses with different design parameters to determine whether in vivo kinematics was consistently related to design. The hypothesis was that there are no clear recognizable differences in in vivo kinematics between different design parameters or prostheses. Methods: At two sites, data were collected by a single observer on 52 knees (49 subjects with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis). Six different total knee prostheses were used: multi-radius, single-radius, fixed-bearing, mobilebearing, posterior-stabilized, cruciate retaining and cruciate sacrificing. Knee kinematics was recorded using fluoroscopy as the patients performed a step-up motion. Results: There was a significant effect of prosthetic design on all outcome parameters; however, post hoc tests showed that the NexGen group was responsible for 80% of the significant values. The range of knee flexion was much smaller in this group, resulting in smaller anterior-posterior translations and rotations. Conclusion: Despite kinematics being generally consistent with the kinematics intended by their design, there were no clear recognizable differences in in vivo kinematics between different design parameters or prostheses. Hence, the differences in design parameters or prostheses are not distinct enough to have an effect on clinical outcome of patients.Biomechanical EngineeringMechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineerin

The effects of hip muscle strengthening on knee load, pain, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a randomised, single-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Lower limb strengthening exercises are an important component of the treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Strengthening the hip abductor and adductor muscles may influence joint loading and/or OA-related symptoms, but no study has evaluated these hypotheses directly. The aim of this randomised, single-blind controlled trial is to determine whether hip abductor and adductor muscle strengthening can reduce knee load and improve pain and physical function in people with medial compartment knee OA. METHODS/DESIGN: 88 participants with painful, radiographically confirmed medial compartment knee OA and varus alignment will be recruited from the community and randomly allocated to a hip strengthening or control group using concealed allocation stratified by disease severity. The hip strengthening group will perform 6 exercises to strengthen the hip abductor and adductor muscles at home 5 times per week for 12 weeks. They will consult with a physiotherapist on 7 occasions to be taught the exercises and progress exercise resistance. The control group will be requested to continue with their usual care. Blinded follow up assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome measure is the change in the peak external knee adduction moment measured during walking. Questionnaires will assess changes in pain and physical function as well as overall perceived rating of change. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed using linear regression modelling and adjusting for baseline outcome values and other demographic characteristics. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence regarding the effect of hip strengthening on knee loads and symptoms in people with medial compartment knee OA. If shown to reduce the knee adduction moment, hip strengthening has the potential to slow disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTR12607000001493

New fluoroscopic imaging technique for investigation of 6DOF knee kinematics during treadmill gait

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>This report presents a new imaging technique for non-invasive study of six degrees of freedom (DOF) knee kinematics during treadmill gait.</p> <p>Materials and methods</p> <p>A treadmill was integrated into a dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to formulate a gait analysis system. To demonstrate the application of the system, a healthy subject walked on the treadmill at four different speeds (1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 MPH) while the DFIS captured the knee motion during three strides under each speed. Characters of knee joint motion were analyzed in 6DOF during the treadmill walking.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The speed of the knee motion was lower than that of the treadmill. Flexion amplitudes increased with increasing walking speed. Motion patterns in other DOF were not affected by increase in walking speed. The motion character was repeatable under each treadmill speed.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The presented technique can be used to accurately measure the 6DOF knee kinematics at normal walking speeds.</p

Classification of patients with knee osteoarthritis in clinical phenotypes: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

<div><p>Objectives</p><p>The existence of phenotypes has been hypothesized to explain the large heterogeneity characterizing the knee osteoarthritis. In a previous systematic review of the literature, six main phenotypes were identified: Minimal Joint Disease (MJD), Malaligned Biomechanical (MB), Chronic Pain (CP), Inflammatory (I), Metabolic Syndrome (MS) and Bone and Cartilage Metabolism (BCM). The purpose of this study was to classify a sample of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) into pre-defined groups characterized by specific variables that can be linked to different disease mechanisms, and compare these phenotypes for demographic and health outcomes.</p><p>Methods</p><p>599 patients were selected from the OAI database FNIH at 24 months’ time to conduct the study. For each phenotype, cut offs of key variables were identified matching the results from previous studies in the field and the data available for the sample. The selection process consisted of 3 steps. At the end of each step, the subjects classified were excluded from the further classification stages. Patients meeting the criteria for more than one phenotype were classified separately into a ‘complex KOA’ group.</p><p>Results</p><p>Phenotype allocation (including complex KOA) was successful for 84% of cases with an overlap of 20%. Disease duration was shorter in the MJD while the CP phenotype included a larger number of Women (81%). A significant effect of phenotypes on WOMAC pain (F = 16.736 p <0.001) and WOMAC physical function (F = 14.676, p < 0.001) was identified after controlling for disease duration.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>This study signifies the feasibility of a classification of KOA subjects in distinct phenotypes based on subgroup-specific characteristics.</p></div

Effects of methods of descending stairs forwards versus backwards on knee joint force in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a clinical controlled study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the kinetic characteristics of compensatory backward descending movement performed by patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using a three-dimensional motion analysis system, we investigated lower extremity joint angles, joint moments, joint force of the support leg in forward and backward descending movements on stairs, and joint force of the leading leg at landing in 7 female patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Compared with the forward descending movement, knee joint angle, joint moment and joint force of the support leg all decreased in the backward descending movement. Joint force of the leading leg at landing was also reduced in the backward descending movement. In addition, we confirmed that the center of body mass was mainly controlled by the knee and ankle joints in the forward descending movement, and by the hip joint in the backward descending movement.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Since it has been reported that knee flexion angle and extensor muscle strength are decreased in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, we believe that backward descending movement is an effective method to use the hip joint to compensate forthese functional defects. In addition, due to the decreased knee joint force both in the leading and support legs in backward descending movement, the effectiveness of compensatory motion for pain control and knee joint protection was also suggested.</p